Libertarianism is as aspirational and utopic—in doctrine—as communism.
a) -ISM implies ones consent to the suggestions of another, which tempts one to ignore LIBER (free), hence being free will of choice, and then allows the suggesting few to collect the consenting many, hence building communes of order followers.
b) aspiration aka aspirating to be implies suggested progressivism (towards outcomes). Life, while being progressed from inception towards death needs to resist the temptation to follow.
c) utopia is based on suggested idealism, once again tempting one to seek outcomes form others, while ignoring to adapt to origin.
d) as for doctrine (from doctor)...one doesn't represent a docked (doct) ore (or), but a vessel (life) with free will of choice to row within flow (inception towards death).
tl; dr...all the suggested words used by the many to communicate are corrupt, are defined, redefined and contradicted by the few, and represent the inversion of perceivable sound and its behavior.
You use -isms to describe something, while ignoring that all the -isms are defined by the few, while the many are busy reasoning about the meaning thereof. This represents division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
I don't try to tell others how to behave, I rip apart what restricts ones free will of choice behavior, hence the suggestions by others.
live and let live
LET, verb - "to permit; to allow; to suffer"...the ongoing process of dying permits and allows temporary living to suffer ones struggle as resistance within temptation.
It ain't other life that allows living, it's the process of dying....loss (inception towards death) lets one grow (life). "live and let live" represents a suggested inversion thereof, a rhetorical suggestion tempting one to fight against others, instead of struggling for the sustenance of self within origin.
It would be nice
You represent the "being"; tempted by suggested "it" to ignore self for "nice" things...
Sleight of hand: "You know it seems the more we talk about it...It only makes it worse to live without it"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfhaA65aM-0 This isn't a pop song, it's ideological warfare, spell-craft, mass deception etc...yet it can be just a pop song if one so chooses...
It would be nice if people had perfect information of the entirety
a) each one of the people represents a partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), while struggling to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Perfection and entirety is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being imperfect and partial.
b) information implies IN FORM...form (life) implies within flow (inception towards death). One represents form within flow, hence the need to adapt to IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe).
The few suggest information to tempt one to ignore perceivable inspiration. You are tempted to want to accumulate the entirety of information, while ignoring to exists within the entirety of inspiration.
Information represents that which you uphold within your mind/memory, while inspiration represents the perceivable flowstate you need to adapt to aka the moving differences surrounding you.
the market
a) M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass), hence the mark (life) of the beast (inception towards death) aka the Passover of life from inception towards death. The mark aka the visible effect (living) of force or agency (process of dying).
b) ignoring the perceivable mark for the suggested "market", tempts one to buy (suggested information) and sell (consent to suggested information) under contract law.
c) merchant implies MER (sea) CHANT (to utter a melodious voice) aka MER (perceivable inspiration) CHANT (suggested information). The happy merchant of temptation is gonna sell you as much information as you want, but you don't need any...a Faustian deal.
at any given moment so as to make the most informed decision
a) motion gives momentum, momentum gives form (living) into flow (process of dying)...form (life) perceives flow (inception towards death) as the ever changing moment (um).
b) does one need to decide to breathe or is one forced to adapt by breathing?
It would be nice if everyone perfectly obeyed the mechanics of voluntarism
Suggested voluntarism represents "acting by choice", which represents the inversion of reaction as choice to being within an enacting balance (need/want) based system.
One cannot choose to have a choice, one represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within balance, with the choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) it.
non-aggression principle.
Defense (living) within offense (process of dying), hence aggression (Latin gradior; gressus, Hebrew; to descend) aka to descend as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
PRIN'CIPLE, noun [Latin principium, beginning.] aka inception towards death...a descend of life.
Why do the many lack to comprehend this? Because each one consents to suggested "non" (nothing). How could one comprehend how everything works if one willingly believes in the existence of nothing?
not how the world works
Again with the suggested nothing, tempting one ignore perceivable everything, which just works...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". It's not hard to comprehend work, it's hard to resist ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
needed responsibility,’ in order to bring...
One represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within the natural order (balance), hence struggling as choice to balance in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested).
One cannot BRING, verb - "to produce; to procure as a cause", one represents the effect of NATURE, noun -"born, produced" as the cause.
actions we need to take...
...ignores reaction each one represents. Life can only react to being directed from inception towards death, hence reacting within an enacting system.
Others suggest "actors" under "directors" as the inversion thereof...
to cleanse society
Society represents suggested collectivism, which represents the inversion of nature setting itself apart from whole (process of dying) into partial (living). The many keep dying because they willingly want to be "part of" collective society, instead of struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Coincidentally; the so called jews survive apart, while not just suggesting the collectivism of societies, but as APART WITHIN them, hence mimicking partial within whole.
Consider if the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) cleanses every chaos (living) within...not matter what those within are up to?
prevent us from doing so
If everyone else suggests one "thou shall not kill", then does that prevent one from utilizing free will of choice to "try" to kill another? You are alive...how are you prevented from living?
a) -ISM implies ones consent to the suggestions of another, which tempts one to ignore LIBER (free), hence being free will of choice, and then allows the suggesting few to collect the consenting many, hence building communes of order followers.
b) aspiration aka aspirating to be implies suggested progressivism (towards outcomes). Life, while being progressed from inception towards death needs to resist the temptation to follow.
c) utopia is based on suggested idealism, once again tempting one to seek outcomes form others, while ignoring to adapt to origin.
d) as for doctrine (from doctor)...one doesn't represent a docked (doct) ore (or), but a vessel (life) with free will of choice to row within flow (inception towards death).
tl; dr...all the suggested words used by the many to communicate are corrupt, are defined, redefined and contradicted by the few, and represent the inversion of perceivable sound and its behavior.
You use -isms to describe something, while ignoring that all the -isms are defined by the few, while the many are busy reasoning about the meaning thereof. This represents division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
I don't try to tell others how to behave, I rip apart what restricts ones free will of choice behavior, hence the suggestions by others.
LET, verb - "to permit; to allow; to suffer"...the ongoing process of dying permits and allows temporary living to suffer ones struggle as resistance within temptation.
It ain't other life that allows living, it's the process of dying....loss (inception towards death) lets one grow (life). "live and let live" represents a suggested inversion thereof, a rhetorical suggestion tempting one to fight against others, instead of struggling for the sustenance of self within origin.
You represent the "being"; tempted by suggested "it" to ignore self for "nice" things...
Sleight of hand: "You know it seems the more we talk about it...It only makes it worse to live without it"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfhaA65aM-0 This isn't a pop song, it's ideological warfare, spell-craft, mass deception etc...yet it can be just a pop song if one so chooses...
a) each one of the people represents a partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), while struggling to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Perfection and entirety is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being imperfect and partial.
b) information implies IN FORM...form (life) implies within flow (inception towards death). One represents form within flow, hence the need to adapt to IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe).
The few suggest information to tempt one to ignore perceivable inspiration. You are tempted to want to accumulate the entirety of information, while ignoring to exists within the entirety of inspiration.
Information represents that which you uphold within your mind/memory, while inspiration represents the perceivable flowstate you need to adapt to aka the moving differences surrounding you.
a) M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass), hence the mark (life) of the beast (inception towards death) aka the Passover of life from inception towards death. The mark aka the visible effect (living) of force or agency (process of dying).
b) ignoring the perceivable mark for the suggested "market", tempts one to buy (suggested information) and sell (consent to suggested information) under contract law.
c) merchant implies MER (sea) CHANT (to utter a melodious voice) aka MER (perceivable inspiration) CHANT (suggested information). The happy merchant of temptation is gonna sell you as much information as you want, but you don't need any...a Faustian deal.
a) motion gives momentum, momentum gives form (living) into flow (process of dying)...form (life) perceives flow (inception towards death) as the ever changing moment (um).
b) does one need to decide to breathe or is one forced to adapt by breathing?
Suggested voluntarism represents "acting by choice", which represents the inversion of reaction as choice to being within an enacting balance (need/want) based system.
One cannot choose to have a choice, one represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within balance, with the choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) it.
Defense (living) within offense (process of dying), hence aggression (Latin gradior; gressus, Hebrew; to descend) aka to descend as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
PRIN'CIPLE, noun [Latin principium, beginning.] aka inception towards death...a descend of life.
Why do the many lack to comprehend this? Because each one consents to suggested "non" (nothing). How could one comprehend how everything works if one willingly believes in the existence of nothing?
Again with the suggested nothing, tempting one ignore perceivable everything, which just works...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". It's not hard to comprehend work, it's hard to resist ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
One represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within the natural order (balance), hence struggling as choice to balance in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested).
One cannot BRING, verb - "to produce; to procure as a cause", one represents the effect of NATURE, noun -"born, produced" as the cause.
...ignores reaction each one represents. Life can only react to being directed from inception towards death, hence reacting within an enacting system.
Others suggest "actors" under "directors" as the inversion thereof...
Society represents suggested collectivism, which represents the inversion of nature setting itself apart from whole (process of dying) into partial (living). The many keep dying because they willingly want to be "part of" collective society, instead of struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Coincidentally; the so called jews survive apart, while not just suggesting the collectivism of societies, but as APART WITHIN them, hence mimicking partial within whole.
Consider if the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) cleanses every chaos (living) within...not matter what those within are up to?
If everyone else suggests one "thou shall not kill", then does that prevent one from utilizing free will of choice to "try" to kill another? You are alive...how are you prevented from living?