a) is the ongoing process of dying stronger that those temporary living within? Can any partial be stronger than the whole?
b) is living good or evil? Is dying good or evil? Can life exist without being moved from inception towards death? Is living without inception/death good or evil? Is dying without living good or evil?
the jews will always win
a) ALWAYS (without variation) represents the inversion of being the variant (life) within the way (inception towards death), hence "ONESWAY".
Sleight of hand: "One way or another I'm gonna get ya"
b) YOUS (phonetic jews) will always win, because each growing ME (life) exists within loss (inception towards death)...one dies; another lives.
c) WIN (to gain) implies being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception toward death)...
d) it took your free "will" of choice to suggest what "will" happen to the jews...
A ripe apple hanging in a tree; a hungry child needing it; a greedy child wanting it...is the tree good or evil?
we're aware
a) how can one be watchful (aware) if there's always more to watch?
b) how could a plural (we) be watchful for each singular (one) within?
to choose one or the other...
...or to be one representing free will of choice among all others?
{their} goal is
a) why do the many keep reasoning about goals, while the few keep taking down goalposts after goalposts within the ongoing game?
b) what if perceivable "was" before any suggestion can be shaped about what it "is"?
influence
IN (life) FLUENT (inception towards death)...how could life be "outfluent"?
lead us
Only followers can be led, while each life implies resisting while being processed from inception towards death.
to choose...en masse
"chosen ones" implies each one with choice. Groups don't choose, each individual chose to consent to a suggested group, which allows the suggesting individual to keep suggesting in the name of the group, hence becoming the suggesting leader for the consenting followers.
goal should be to do the opposite
a) being (life) implies being done in-between opposites (inception/death), hence representing the opportunity to RE (respond to) DO (being done by) self.
b) origin (inception) drives being (life) towards goal (death), hence the want to reach goals tempting one to ignore the need to sustain self.
I think - it’s like the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil
Now that we’re aware, it’s up to us to choose one or the other in our lives.
{their} goal is to influence/lead us to choose evil over good, en masse
Our goal should be / is (imo) to do the opposite
a) is the ongoing process of dying stronger that those temporary living within? Can any partial be stronger than the whole?
b) is living good or evil? Is dying good or evil? Can life exist without being moved from inception towards death? Is living without inception/death good or evil? Is dying without living good or evil?
a) ALWAYS (without variation) represents the inversion of being the variant (life) within the way (inception towards death), hence "ONESWAY".
Sleight of hand: "One way or another I'm gonna get ya"
b) YOUS (phonetic jews) will always win, because each growing ME (life) exists within loss (inception towards death)...one dies; another lives.
c) WIN (to gain) implies being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception toward death)...
d) it took your free "will" of choice to suggest what "will" happen to the jews...
A ripe apple hanging in a tree; a hungry child needing it; a greedy child wanting it...is the tree good or evil?
a) how can one be watchful (aware) if there's always more to watch?
b) how could a plural (we) be watchful for each singular (one) within?
...or to be one representing free will of choice among all others?
a) why do the many keep reasoning about goals, while the few keep taking down goalposts after goalposts within the ongoing game?
b) what if perceivable "was" before any suggestion can be shaped about what it "is"?
IN (life) FLUENT (inception towards death)...how could life be "outfluent"?
Only followers can be led, while each life implies resisting while being processed from inception towards death.
"chosen ones" implies each one with choice. Groups don't choose, each individual chose to consent to a suggested group, which allows the suggesting individual to keep suggesting in the name of the group, hence becoming the suggesting leader for the consenting followers.
a) being (life) implies being done in-between opposites (inception/death), hence representing the opportunity to RE (respond to) DO (being done by) self.
b) origin (inception) drives being (life) towards goal (death), hence the want to reach goals tempting one to ignore the need to sustain self.