a) WEALTH /WEAL/WILL...others suggest wealth as "prosperity; external happiness" to distract one from being free "will" of choice within a balance based system. Consenting to wealth decreases will.

b) AR-AM-CO aka Arabian-American Oil Company.

c) OIL (oleum; aelan; fire) + COMPANY aka com (together; with) pa (to feed)...a burned offering.

d) Look at the graphic...taking the two towers down makes it easier to discern the PROPHETS foretelling PROFITS.

e) Insane (Latin in sanus; within sound)...that's where person (Latin per sonos; by sound) comes to be.

f) SAUDI (Arabic sa'd) - "happiness"...it's just a jew fucking with the ignorance of gentiles.

candace owens

OWEN (Greek eugenes) - "well born" + CANDI; KATTU - "sugar; condensed"...reducing something to a denser form by means of eugenics (dysgenics). Now look at her husband...George Farmer aka Greek Georgos - "husbandman, farmer". How Orwellian... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm

• Within fiction:

Repute; verb - "to believe (that something is so)" aka a gentiles consent to believe that what a jew suggests (candice owens) is so.

• Within reality:

Reputation aka ones response (re) to given (putare) action (ation).

A jew suggests a burned offering (holocaust) aka KINDLE FIRE...gentiles consent to put books in it.

Not even subtext

a) Substitute (sub) contradicts equal (even)...suggested nihil-ism (not) tempts ones de-nial thereof.

b) Text (the wording of anything written) implies suggested substitute (word) for perceivable differentiation (spectrum) within equal (sound).

we will give

a) Only one (singular) can wield free "will" of choice...suggested pluralism (we) requires ones consenting free will of choice to choose to ignore self for others.

b) Only balance gives choice; while "giving" consent to other choices implies ignoring ones choice, hence imbalance of self.

fully adopted

To adopt implies "take to one's self"...one cannot take full/entire/whole to one's self without ignoring to be partial (one) within whole (oneness).

Suggested "adopt" contradicts perceivable "adapt". Ones perception needs to adapt to all perceivable; while the suggestions by others tempt one to adopt them.

environmental causes

a) Suggested pluralism (causes) tempts singular (effect) to ignore self discernment within singularity (cause).

b) ENVIRON (surrounding) implies perceivable cause for ones perceiving MENT (mind) being affected by it.

Mind/memory can only exist at center of surrounding input.

making believable

a) make belief

b) MAKE; noun (Latin gemaca) - "mate, equal; one of a pair, comrade"

c) The Talmud has two components: the mishnah and the gemara/gemaca...

d) One cannot make (equal) without ignoring being (different).

information and credible

Aka suggested information towards consenting creed/credo/credit...

resisting...confronting

To confront implies together (con) forwards (front); to resist implies responding (re) to stance (sistere) within origin.

If resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) confronts outcomes; then resistance ignores velocity.

behemoth of lies

Aka Hebrew; b'hemoth - "beast"; which implies being (be) astute/discerning (ast).

If one ignores to be astute (beast) aka discerning self within perceivable for consenting to the suggestions by others; then one marks/mercs/limits self.

peer reviewed

Ones response (re) to view the suggestions of ones equal (peer); which implies ones ignorance of sight within perceivable differentiation.

If one sees something; then that implies a differentiation between some-thing and one-thing. Equals cannot exist within differentiation.

Polaris never moves, ever.

a) PO'LARIZE, verb -"to communicate polarity to"...how does communication over distance (all perceivable towards ones perception) work without motion?

b) Notice that "never" contradicts "ever"...

• PEER, noun (Latin par) - "an equal; one of the same"

Being implies as one different from one another. A being cannot be equal to another being, since each came to be at a different position from one another.

Appear implies perceivable differences; "a peer" implies suggested semblance.

What do they have to gain by stating the earth is round?

a) Waves (life) within a line (inception towards death) can be tricked to turn against each other within circular reasoning.

b) Perception within perceivable implies center of souROUNDing...the suggestions by others tempt ones consent off-center and into CIRCEcumference.

c) What do few gain if many willingly ignore everything perceivable nature offers for the suggestions by few?

a) Treason (treacherous) implies against another; artificial work (machina) implies from another...both tempt one to ignore self for others.

b) Before one can view self as WITH others; one exists WITH-IN all.

language used is often simple

Suggested language implies words shaped by setting letters together...aka a complex/composite of more than one. Sound implies whole (perceivable) setting itself apart (perception) aka whole (oneness) into partials (ones) aka simple/single.

Sound (simple) or Words (complex)...one is perceivable as self; the other suggested by others. Consenting to the latter; tempts one to ignore former.

Of course water can curve, it's a fluid...water at rest is always flat, level, and horizontal.

REST, noun - "cessation of motion" contradicts FLUID; adjective (Latin fluere) - "to flow". Water (matter) seeking level implies balancing (momentum) within motion.

The trick...ones consent to suggested words tempts one to hold onto definitions (definite; affixed), which implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death).

It can take the shape of anything you put it in, or forces applied to it

a) What if it (matter) already exists within (momentum) an outside force (motion)?

b) What if form (life) can only be shaped within the mold (momentum) of flow (motion)?

c) What if calling matter (water) motion (fluid) tempts one to ignore the perceivable mold for those molding suggestions aka those who make the calls?

equally on all sides

How can sides differentiated from one another be equal? While you're considering that...why do few suggest equality (same) through diversity (difference) towards many?

a "conspiracy scene"

Always an aggregation; a group; a coming together...which aligns with tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or shevirat hakeilim (shattering of the vessels).

like this one...

...aka the ONE apart from ONE another; which ONE ignores when consenting to suggested aggregation; groups; coming together etc.

The CON in con-spire implies "together; with"; while SPIRO (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies as one (expression) within all (impression).

In short...to be implies in-spire; ignoring this permits others to "con-spire".

paid off by ((money))

How does one resist selling out to few; when the majority keeps buying into?

good info

Good vs bad...always a conflict, when consenting to any suggested information.

Alex Jones vs this Matt Guy

a) Again...it doesn't matter what information anyone suggests; only which (good vs bad) side one chooses to consent to.

b) If you exchange AJ and Matt with Mr. Beast and Logan Paul; then your choice remains the same...want vs not want. The information is irrelevant to your choice; it's your consent within a conflict of reason that all suggested information aims at.

the elite

French élite - "selection, choice" aka ones free will of choice selecting whatever others are suggesting....ones choice selects chosen ones suggestion.

Disruption of flat surface...

if you don't warm someone up to an idea (nature of reality) by gradually feeding it to them it can really fuck them up.

a) How fucked up can one be to be cold to the nature of reality?

b) If one suggests the "nature of reality" for consumption to another; then what if that tempts others to ignore that nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)?

c) What if nature implies rapid hunger; which those within exploit by suggesting artificial consumption of gradual appetite? Notice that whatever few are suggesting; many want or not want more of it?

Hunger (perceivable need) or Appetite (suggested want) implies ones free will of choice in-between. One needs to resist wanted temptations. Why? To grow resistance.

reasons, and implications

Reason contradicts implication. Big Mac versus Whopper implies a conflict of reason; which in return tempts one to ignore that...if one consumes what another suggests (want or not want); then one ignores perceivable (need).

There's no conflict within implication (if/then); only within reason. To reason implies against another; implication implies as self in response to origin.

what not will still even connect

Few suggest many to "connect"; while ignoring that nature sets apart. If growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) makes connections; then all connections will be lost.

a) ARROWS (phonetic eros) aka eran - "to desire".

b) Perception (rise) within perceivable (loss) implies "high-way"; consenting to suggested implies "sub-way".

c) DE (entirely) TAILLIER (to cut into pieces)...guess who's "in the details"?

Entire (inception towards death) cut into pieces (life) aka "cut my life into pieces, this is my last resort"... https://genius.com/Papa-roach-last-resort-lyrics

• "Downward spiral, where do I begin?"
• Searchin' to find a love upon a higher level"
• "Findin' nothin' but questions and devils"

a) Artificial Intelligence (AI) implies a jew suggesting artifice (information) and gentiles consenting to understand (Latin intelligo) aka to willingly stand-under it.

If one resists suggested information (artifice) for perceivable inspiration (nature); then one can discern that HE-BREW HIS-STORY to trick JEW/YOU to fall for it.

b) Nature implies shortage (life) within abundance (inception towards death)...it ain't a storage system for information; but an action towards reactions system of moving inspiration to draw from.

c) Nature doesn't impress durable (to write) it directs ongoing flow (inception towards death) towards temporary wave-form (life), hence impressing (perceivable inspiration) breakable (each ones perception).

creatures to be separated from

Being implies as partial within whole...suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore origin of separation for division among other beings.

exorcism

Ex (out of) horkos (oath) implies ones consent to suggested -ism, which binds one to another.

Oath implies being holding onto each others suggestions; while ignoring that perceivable implies oath-breaking. In other words...whatever form (life) holds onto; flow (inception towards death) breaks apart.

stop your body from the spirit being able to connect with it

Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies solid (life) adapting to fluid (inception towards death)...others suggest "stop" and "connect" to distract one from discerning that motion sets apart, and therefore that one is partial matter within whole motion.

they're causing this separation from god

To suggest that "they're causing" contradicts the one and only cause (god)...if one consents to believe it.

Muddying (turbid) the waters; instead of letting it clear.

how you think things will go

The only way things can go...forwards aka back to origin.

things cannot continue

Only within continuance (whole) can there be things (partials)....suggested nihilism (cannot) tempts one to ignore that.

Telepathy

Aka tele (distance; to stand apart) path (passageway)...being implies TELE (life) within PATH (inception towards death).

To "communicate with people telepathically" implies artificially put together that which nature sets apart, and ones consent to the suggestions by another implies the putting together of artifice (information), while ignoring natural (inspiration).

straight up go to Dante's inferno

a) He left his path (perceivable inspiration) and then followed a guide (suggested information) through the circles (circular reasoning).

b) Nel mezzo del cammin di nostra vita (midway in the journey of our life) aka middle (life) of way (inception towards death).

That mezzo/middle one ignores when consenting to stand-under (understand) the suggestions by another. In other words...consenting to a chosen ones suggestion; tempts ones choice off balance, hence off center and into surrounding.

Concentric circles implies "common center"; being implies unique center aka each ones perception at the center of all perceivable circumference.

c) The suggesting guide was called VIRGIL aka Bibliomancy; noun - "divination by opening a book at random; prognostication of future events"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bibliomancy#etymonline_v_11117

Following the suggestions by others tempts one to ignore perceivable origin.

Have you ever heard of a prison...

Have you ever heard of a prison that wasn't suggested to you by others? Consenting to such a suggestion confines ones mind to the suggested, hence establishing im-prison-ment aka mind within prison.

Meanwhile within perceivable reality...EVER (continually) implies the continuous nature (inception towards death) for each temporary being (life) within.

I'm just done with the word games.

• GAME, noun - "sport of any kind"
• SPORT, noun - "that which diverts"
• DIVERT, verb - "to turn off from any course, direction"

Perceivable (sound) implies direction; suggested (words) implies diversion.