Reason contradicts implication. Big Mac versus Whopper implies a conflict of reason; which in return tempts one to ignore that...if one consumes what another suggests (want or not want); then one ignores perceivable (need).
There's no conflict within implication (if/then); only within reason. To reason implies against another; implication implies as self in response to origin.
Reason contradicts implication. Big Mac versus Whopper implies a conflict of reason; which in return tempts one to ignore that...if one consumes what another suggests (want or not want); then one ignores perceivable (need).
There's no conflict within implication (if/then); only within reason. To reason implies against another; implication implies as self in response to origin.