I would strongly disagree with anyone who claims that revelation is unavoidable. But to amplify, the Elite cannot control Reality, so the foundation of their entire program is to control our perception of Reality, which is the same on a functional basis. Indeed, they wish even to control the nature of our consciousnesses with which we perceive reality.
As an example, much of history has been rewritten. That is, what was once common, everyday knowledge has been destroyed. Once revealed, knowledge may certainly be concealed again.
I wouldn't get wrapped up by anything occultists have to say. I have found it to be virtually all BS and nonsense. Many of their claims are simply incorrect. And with those erroneous claims, I get the sense they aren't liars--as one might expect--but rather that they have been misled with false knowledge and their arrogance gives them to pass it on as fact.
As I see it at the current time, there are two counterbalancing forces. On one side is the absolute truth. "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." I wish to advance the cause of freedom, therefore I wish to find and share the truth to those who wish to hear it.
Which brings us to the other side: the vast majority do not wish to hear it, and will react negatively to those around them who speak it. "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine." Really, there's the initiation that is needed: that which prepares people to hear the truth.
In the end, we may make this moral analysis: If you seek to act morally, you must always try to discover the truth. The same goes for everyone. If you expect others to act morally, it is your duty to aid them. Thus, it is your duty to do what is within your power to help them discover the truth for themselves.
I don't disagree, and every little bit helps.
We are given to believe that we go to work to put money in our pockets, but really, the purpose of our work should be to help and serve one another, and to advance what we call civilization. In all respects this is admirable and enables humanity to develop to it's true potential and find it's ultimate destiny.
But you see how truly perverse and diabolical our situation is when we have to avoid that just so we can slow down the construction of our prison a bit, and throw a little sand in the gears of the machine enslaving us.
Too true, too true. The problems we're facing appear enormous and insurmountable, so we're all waiting around for a savior to come by and put the world to right. But at the same time, virtually all of us fail to do that which is well within out power to do.
There are innumerable examples, but the one that always gets me--and it comes up often--is when people sue to get rehired by an organization that fired them because they refused the clot shot. Well, that sounds like a good thing, right?
No, it's incredibly wrong. Why would anyone wish to give (actually, compel the organization to allow them to give) their efforts towards advancing the interests of an entity that--wittingly or unwittingly--participated in a global genocidal program? Does that make any sense? Should that in any way be applauded as progress?
Is it within the power of most people just to get another job? Given the wave of "died suddenly" and the help wanted signs everywhere, I think it's easier than it''s been in a while. But described in the terms I just used--and I believe used fairly--to continue on the path the vast majority choose to take seems clearly to be suicidal insanity.
Put a black box around what caused you to feel the way you do and how exactly that was accomplished. It seems to me that that is precisely how the Dark Occultists would prefer everyone who might offer them resistance would feel.
You're free to hand them a victory over yourself, but you may want to reconsider spreading such an idea to others. Well, unless that was your point.
I leave room for that, but more and more evidence stacks up to them being two distinct events, coming at either end of the Younger Dryas and about 1200-1400 years apart. The case for the Great Flood at about 13,000 years ago is particularly strong, coming from several quite independent lines of evidence.
Atlantis is much more fuzzy all around and I haven't studied it closely, but for a number of reasons my working thesis is that it was located in Antarctica. The best evidence for that has been assembled by Rand and Rose Flem-Ath. It seems Antarctica was displaced from significantly farther north, but if it was spontaneous or part of a larger crustal shift as discussed by Chan Thomas is still not firmly established (at least to my knowledge).
There are two interesting points for the conspiracy-minded as regards Antarctica. One is that after I first heard the strong case for it years ago, I find it's virtually never mentioned by Atlantis researchers. That fits the thesis that the vast majority of them are ultimately disinfo agents. The other is that we would finally get a clue towards explaining what all those Elites went down there to look at. I never bought that it was penguins.
Finally, through two very different associations, I connect both the Great Flood and Atlantis directly to the Anunnaki, a faction of whom the Elites still serve to this day. Taking that into account, I understood why the Elite believe it's so important to steer people over a cliff on both those issues.
IDK how it compares, but I think almost everything I post over there is shadowbanned, with a small amount allowed but deboosted.
I still post anyway, like ice-cold seawater trying to seep into their hermetically sealed social media submarine.
Regrettably, I don't think it's "our guys", although there is a bright side to it.
In my view, this is a form of limited hangout. Normies process reality by what they see in entertainment. So when they see this type of material, they think, "OMG, that's so crazy! I mean, I know it's not like anything like that could ever actually happen and they gotta jazz it up for the movies, but could you imagine if it ever really happened sometime?"
See the dynamic caused by the framing? They place the much worse reality outside the imagination of the viewer. So now if you talk about it, you're some kind of conspiracy kook who thinks movies are real.
The bright side, though, is that They have been pushed to such measures. They would have liked to have kept it invisible, unreasonable, impossible. Read correctly, it's a sign of substantive progress.
Zero... zero... now where have I heard that before? Oh yes. Year Zero (political notion):
The Khmer Rouge's takeover of Phnom Penh was rapidly followed by a series of drastic revolutionary de-industrialization policies which resulted in a death toll which vastly exceeded the death toll which resulted from the French Reign of Terror.
Being both shocked and a good scholar, you checked out the link and--scandalized--found it doesn't contain that sentence at all. "Disinformation!", you cry.
Yeah, they got rid of it recently and you'll have to reference it in an older revision of the page such as this one. Now why would they delete such a spicy characterization?
We never really knew America. Just as one tiny example, the White House, the Capitol Building, and the Esienhower Executive Office Building just across from the WH are all Tartarian (the EEOB is especially obvious) and were all mudflooded at some point, then there's not a single word in a history book about any of that. What other lies have we been told about what we currently "know" to be it's history?
On the flip side, I've always thought that the great strength of America is that it gets up every day and reinvents itself. Well, reinventing itself one more time from what now exists should not be much of a problem. Those not up to the task should consider excusing themselves to make way for those that are.
In this as in many other circumstances, we should steer towards that from which They try to steer us away. Wiki takes pains to say:
In the Masonic drama, "Hiram, King of Tyre" is clearly distinguished from "Hiram Abiff". The former is clearly a king and the latter clearly a master craftsman.
But why would they make such a fine distinction with Hiram I, as if they are just so many Hirams floating around involved in constructing temples?
Is it because Hiram I's father was Abibaal ("My father is Baal") and his son was Baal-Eser I ("Baal is pre-eminent")? Notice anything familiar about those names?
The truth is not well-hidden, frens, but we must still pull back the curtain ourselves.
Yeah, it was just an analogy I thought most would be able to relate to on a more visceral level.
Interestingly, I saw a video a few years ago on the YT channel of a commercial pilot. People had written in asking if an ordinary person could actually be "talked down by the tower" as in a movie. He had a really, really elaborate home flight simulator setup to be able to try it out.
The answer was yes, but that was not the surprising part. IIRC, the young lady subject never actually touched the control stick. Everything was a matter of modes and settings and dials and switches, like the most elaborate climate control ever in a car. The plane pretty much just landed itself given the proper settings.
That was the first time I'd seen it in action like that, but the subject had come up a few years before that. People doubted that the 911 planes could have been flown remotely. Some pilot said that by that time, planes had long been able to take off, fly to the destination, land, and even taxi to the terminal all on autopilot. The only reason they kept pilots is because passengers would freak out and refuse to fly if the cockpit was empty as they walked in.
The series really cemented for me that Hancock is controlled opposition. It's not that you can't learn anything from the material or that he's lying about it, but he uses it to lead you astray from deeper truths. A limited hangout, if you will.
As, for example, with the Great Flood versus Atlantis. There is far, far more evidence for the Great Flood than for Atlantis. So why not do a show about the Flood? In the series he tiptoes around it. I can't recall with certainty, but I believe he mentions it only in passing a couple of times as a legend, giving no weight to it.
But why avoid talking about the Flood? Well, the Dark Occultists running the world wish to give no credence to the Bible. But beyond that, the true cause of the Flood was not actually God's punishment, but the passage through the inner solar system of Nibiru, and They really, really do not want anyone talking about that.
There's also a practical aspect which is never, ever given consideration. That is, at the present time the Deep State literally runs everything and you can't just snap your fingers, get rid of them, and expect everything will be okay.
As an analogy, think about being on an airplane full of people where you find out the pilot raped and murdered your spouse and children, the co-pilot helped, and the flight attendants knew about it and did nothing because they were busy robbing and burning down houses in your neighborhood. Is it a good idea to take your boxcutter and go around bringing justice to the guilty?
Even if you're a dangerously unstable person willing to risk the lives of everyone aboard and thought you'd take the chance of finding someone else to fly the plane, what's the pilot going to do while you're working your way forward taking out stewardesses? Dump all the fuel, of course. He's got nothing to lose at this point, and maybe he can even talk you into letting him glide the plane to a crash landing. He's a psychopath, after all.
I was listening to this episode of Earth Ancients (Mario Buildreps: 100,000 Years of Man Unknown History), which I thought was going to be about pole shifts.
It was, and he makes a very strong case for it, but way into the interview he mentions that the reason the pole has been shifting is because of the expansion of the Earth! I did not see that coming.
Jackie Killed JFK? Saying Jackie shot JFK since 2010!
That's the main site with plenty of evidence, but in the years since I first stumbled across it, I've found much more. Also, I always compare that thesis to the analysis from any JFK researcher I happen to hear. Do they mention any of the evidence pointing towards Jackie?
Nope. When you listen closely there's a howling silence. I've concluded that probably about 80% of the high-profile JFK researchers are disinfo, and a further 15% are basing their work on the misleading research of those disinfo agents.
Beyond the whodunit, the event was clearly a public ritual murder, Satanic in nature. And you can add in that the famous Oswald assassination that was supposed to shut the lid was also hoaxed.
So whether you agree with all that or not, just fix in your mind for a moment that those things are all true. Is the public really ready for that? I personally don't think so. At least, they reject it out of hand--sometimes vehemently--when I bring even a little of it up.
And if you're saying to yourself, "That is all so ridiculous I can't even tentatively entertain it to be true for the sake of argument," then, well, you definitely get my point.
I'm not certain I would disagree with Trump on this. The truth about the JFK assassination, as I understand it, is so shocking and terrifying even for "truthers" that I can observe them subconsciously steering away from it in an act of mental and emotional--even spiritual--self-preservation.
You can add to that the extreme levels of societal division, stress, and uncertainty. Also, the vast majority of the population is psychotic, which is geometrically compounded by the fact that the entire "mental health" establishment is unable to recognize this. And every other person being drugged to the gills on one or multiple substances only amplifies all this.
All in all, you have to ask yourself a fundamental practical question, "Would revealing the truth about this right now really help our situation?" As much as I've dedicated my life to a pursuit of the truth over the last few years, and believe that the truth will be our ultimate salvation, I have to admit that few actually want the truth, and fewer still can handle it.
And if all this winds up with me saying the kind of things the Elites say, yeah, that frightens me too.
I am reminded of this verse:
Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.
Matthew 12:31
The word translated as "Holy Ghost" is "pneuma", and conventionally this is the Holy Spirit of the Trinity. As a working hypothesis, I've wondered whether the "Holy Spirit" actually refers to the "Spirit of True Care", which dwells within (at least some of) us and impels us to act in for the good of others, which is to say morally.
So in practice, if you don't always act with the Spirit of True Care, that may be forgiven as with other sins. But if you blaspheme against it, which is to say that you counsel others to violate the Spirit of True Care, that will not be forgiven.
Of course one can see that counseling others to such violation enables the spread of evil, so yeah, maybe that should be unforgivable.
I've never really worried that "They" would cut the power, Internet, or phone service except as a normal military precaution preceding a specific strike or to disrupt an imminent enemy operation. The downsides of any sort of general cutoff are just too huge. And it doesn't matter who They blame it on because the effect is the same.
When the power goes out (and Internet and cell would soon follow) what happens? Everyone gets cut off from Netflix and Reddit and Pornhub and texting and email and shopping and everything else used to distract and program us. That's bad for Them.
What's also bad is that everyone gets off their couch and goes out to talk to the neighbors. They trade information, and get to see how good it is just to interact with normal folks. Also, everyone let's everyone else know how pissed off they are that "the authorities" have let this come to pass, and maybe it's time to start taking some action to put things right.
Finally, for those of a certain frame of mind, their internal Defcon Level goes up a notch or two. Preps are dusted off and contingencies are activated. Mindsets are altered. That's very bad for Them indeed.
I wonder if anyone reading this guide has asked themselves whether General Flynn is himself part of the 5GW effort against them. I suspect not. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is Fifth Generation Warfare.