The Gnostic concepts of the Demiurge and the Archons are corrupted versions of the truth behind the Elohim. The corruption is so severe that I believe it was intentional. That is, I think Gnosticism was invented and promoted to proto-Christians to offramp them from the truth, most importantly the moral teachings of Jesus.
The theology is all so snarled, and so polluted with the ruminations of the arrogant who have "enlightened" themselves with this nonsense that I never spent any more effort trying to unwind it to find any valuable nuggets left inside.
But with hindsight, you can see how attractive such esotericism is to the self-important pseudo-seeker after knowledge. Maybe we'll even get to see one or two of them correct me on this!
Have you read Adam and Eve by Chan, Thomas? It's quite thought provoking and practical. He posits that there have been many cataclysms of biblical proportions in our history. He describes the mechanisms through which they occur and paints an entirely new view of Genesis. A view that is not blasphemous or magical. The most interesting part is that it ties the world's myths together and puts them in their place in time. It also happened to be censored by the CIA. They later released a 58 page redacted government special of it. It is quite an expensive book to come by and good luck finding a PDF version that isn't blatantly tainted. If you use Yandex, you can find it.
I downloaded it back when it first made the rounds I read through the first part of it then set it aside and haven't gotten back to it. Since then, I've learned quite a bit and adopted a more targeted approach to my research. That is, if some particular thing is being hidden from us, what is it and what makes it so important?
The two specific events I've identified as having enough importance to hide or divert us from are those defining the Younger Dryas Period. Generally, these could be referred to as "The Great Flood" (10800 BC) and "The Destruction of Atlantis" (9600 BC). We have to be careful because all narratives--and there are many--attached to either of these descriptions are incomplete and corrupted and we must painstakingly piece them back together
Chan Thomas' work seems to pertain more to Atlantis. The way that seems to be shaping up, that event was caused by a pole shift, and I think the pole shift itself was caused by a shift in the location of Antarctica.
But why hide any of this from us? Who cares, right? There are reasons to think that Antarctica was the location of a main base of the Anunnaki, and They don't want us following the trail that leads to us wondering just what in the hell is under the ice and why we can't go there.
Interesting post, I will take some time to respond tomorrow when I have not consumed too many beverages. I'd like to continue this discourse if at all possible. It's rare to find anyone to discuss these topics with who aren't over the edge in one way or another. Best wishes for the new year to you and yours.
The Gnostic concepts of the Demiurge and the Archons are corrupted versions of the truth behind the Elohim. The corruption is so severe that I believe it was intentional. That is, I think Gnosticism was invented and promoted to proto-Christians to offramp them from the truth, most importantly the moral teachings of Jesus.
The theology is all so snarled, and so polluted with the ruminations of the arrogant who have "enlightened" themselves with this nonsense that I never spent any more effort trying to unwind it to find any valuable nuggets left inside.
But with hindsight, you can see how attractive such esotericism is to the self-important pseudo-seeker after knowledge. Maybe we'll even get to see one or two of them correct me on this!
Have you read Adam and Eve by Chan, Thomas? It's quite thought provoking and practical. He posits that there have been many cataclysms of biblical proportions in our history. He describes the mechanisms through which they occur and paints an entirely new view of Genesis. A view that is not blasphemous or magical. The most interesting part is that it ties the world's myths together and puts them in their place in time. It also happened to be censored by the CIA. They later released a 58 page redacted government special of it. It is quite an expensive book to come by and good luck finding a PDF version that isn't blatantly tainted. If you use Yandex, you can find it.
I downloaded it back when it first made the rounds I read through the first part of it then set it aside and haven't gotten back to it. Since then, I've learned quite a bit and adopted a more targeted approach to my research. That is, if some particular thing is being hidden from us, what is it and what makes it so important?
The two specific events I've identified as having enough importance to hide or divert us from are those defining the Younger Dryas Period. Generally, these could be referred to as "The Great Flood" (10800 BC) and "The Destruction of Atlantis" (9600 BC). We have to be careful because all narratives--and there are many--attached to either of these descriptions are incomplete and corrupted and we must painstakingly piece them back together
Chan Thomas' work seems to pertain more to Atlantis. The way that seems to be shaping up, that event was caused by a pole shift, and I think the pole shift itself was caused by a shift in the location of Antarctica.
But why hide any of this from us? Who cares, right? There are reasons to think that Antarctica was the location of a main base of the Anunnaki, and They don't want us following the trail that leads to us wondering just what in the hell is under the ice and why we can't go there.
Interesting post, I will take some time to respond tomorrow when I have not consumed too many beverages. I'd like to continue this discourse if at all possible. It's rare to find anyone to discuss these topics with who aren't over the edge in one way or another. Best wishes for the new year to you and yours.