I downloaded it back when it first made the rounds I read through the first part of it then set it aside and haven't gotten back to it. Since then, I've learned quite a bit and adopted a more targeted approach to my research. That is, if some particular thing is being hidden from us, what is it and what makes it so important?
The two specific events I've identified as having enough importance to hide or divert us from are those defining the Younger Dryas Period. Generally, these could be referred to as "The Great Flood" (10800 BC) and "The Destruction of Atlantis" (9600 BC). We have to be careful because all narratives--and there are many--attached to either of these descriptions are incomplete and corrupted and we must painstakingly piece them back together
Chan Thomas' work seems to pertain more to Atlantis. The way that seems to be shaping up, that event was caused by a pole shift, and I think the pole shift itself was caused by a shift in the location of Antarctica.
But why hide any of this from us? Who cares, right? There are reasons to think that Antarctica was the location of a main base of the Anunnaki, and They don't want us following the trail that leads to us wondering just what in the hell is under the ice and why we can't go there.
Interesting post, I will take some time to respond tomorrow when I have not consumed too many beverages. I'd like to continue this discourse if at all possible. It's rare to find anyone to discuss these topics with who aren't over the edge in one way or another. Best wishes for the new year to you and yours.
I downloaded it back when it first made the rounds I read through the first part of it then set it aside and haven't gotten back to it. Since then, I've learned quite a bit and adopted a more targeted approach to my research. That is, if some particular thing is being hidden from us, what is it and what makes it so important?
The two specific events I've identified as having enough importance to hide or divert us from are those defining the Younger Dryas Period. Generally, these could be referred to as "The Great Flood" (10800 BC) and "The Destruction of Atlantis" (9600 BC). We have to be careful because all narratives--and there are many--attached to either of these descriptions are incomplete and corrupted and we must painstakingly piece them back together
Chan Thomas' work seems to pertain more to Atlantis. The way that seems to be shaping up, that event was caused by a pole shift, and I think the pole shift itself was caused by a shift in the location of Antarctica.
But why hide any of this from us? Who cares, right? There are reasons to think that Antarctica was the location of a main base of the Anunnaki, and They don't want us following the trail that leads to us wondering just what in the hell is under the ice and why we can't go there.
Interesting post, I will take some time to respond tomorrow when I have not consumed too many beverages. I'd like to continue this discourse if at all possible. It's rare to find anyone to discuss these topics with who aren't over the edge in one way or another. Best wishes for the new year to you and yours.