IMO Khashoggi is pretty much dead
Took a lot of skimming to get there, and I like the characterization of "pretty much", that state of affairs regarding life and death will be news to many of us.
For those trying to sort through the complex story, they can take whatever your analysis was (which I'm sure is filled with insight for those who choose to read it), and put it together with this strange revelation:
Khashoggi's 'body double' is pictured leaving Saudi consulate wearing fake beard, murdered journalist's clothes and glasses hours after Saudi intelligence officers butchered him (MailOnline and AP 10/22/2018)
But then again, agreeing with everyone from Sean Hannity to The View on what to think of bin Salman is probably a good idea too just on the face of it.
Ehm... maybe, because he is one?
Hard to argue with that kind of logic. Impossible, in fact, and not necessarily because it's correct.
I note a glaring omission where you failed to address the Khashoggi affair. I think you should say whether you conclude he's alive or dead. Then we can all have a firm basis to judge the worth of your powers of analysis. You make such bold claims, it's hard to believe you wouldn't start with an evaluation of facts.
And thanks for your advice on not fooling myself. I had always thought it was a good idea before this.
What gets me is that Europe doesn't get that it's under attack by America. More specifically, most Europeans don't get that they're under attack by the US government with the cooperation of their own.
Or maybe they are aware, and it's just one more thing of which Americans are kept in strict ignorance.
To put a finer point on the mental disorder, well, I believe it rather to be that a great number of people have no internal moral sense. That is, things don't just strike them as right or wrong. They don't usually run riot because an external authority can expose them to a moral or legal code and hold them accountable.
In this particular example. no external authority (like the fancy people on their TV) has shown this to them and told them this is wrong. Surely, though, somewhere in the world, there must be some Leftists that are exposed to this information.
Have we heard any of them say, about this or any of the other outrages, "Hey I'm 100% for Ukraine as the aggrieved party, but they can't do this. It's wrong, and anyone enabling them is also in the wrong." Nope. I have yet to come across any evidence of the independent functioning of a moral sense in these people.
Want to see how disinfo works? Take a couple of quotes:
In 2013, the Parliament of Volgograd imposed a new tradition of changing the city’s name for 24 hours... although the initiative did not quite crystallize into a tradition since it was not embraced every year....
The regional government is planning to hold a referendum on the name change.
Write that up as:
Kremlin trying to change Volgograd’s name back to Stalingrad
People clearly do not read past the headline these days, and "They" know it.
The context is a bigger story than that when you consider the question:
Are The "Saudi" Royal Family Jewish?
As I see the state of play, MbS has finally broken from the Zio-NWO and intends to make Saudi Arabia independent of them. That's why we've seen so much of all this "brutal dictator" nonsense and the whole Jamal K. psyop. "They" want this guy gone.
So The Saker, whom I have long suspect of being high-level disinfo, will tip their hand a little to display the tenuous association with the highly radioactive Zionists. It's an indication of how big a threat they consider MbS to the status quo and how much pressure They are under.
Judy Wood is disnfo of a particular sort. I believe that she just started out with good intentions and the wrong idea and therefore got support from "Them". I detect from her behavior that she's now aware of this situation, but will never correct herself because her career will collapse into dust if she does.
As direct evidence, she denies that there was any excess heat at the site. I guess she missed the pools of molten metal, fires that would not go out, and melted shoes.
Look up the work of Dimitri Khalezov and Heinz Pommer for a very full account of the nuclear destruction.
Frankly, I would probably think exactly the same thing. The logic is consistent enough and the pattern of deception is right on brand.
Except the way it worked for me was that, over a few years I had collected lots of disparate pieces of evidence seemingly related but forming no coherent picture. Finally, I stumbled across a key piece and everything fell into place, like pieces in a kaleidoscope forming an unmistakable image.
I was finally looking through the telescope from the right end. Over the years since then, I've collected perhaps a couple of thousand pieces of evidence consistent with and expanding on that original framework, and failed to find any counter-evidence. Also, I see many things scholars and historians have missed or misinterpreted. They seem plain to me, not because I'm brilliant but simply because--again--they're looking through the wrong end of the telescope.
And I have considered the thought, "What if 'They' are so far ahead that 'They' have planted this evidence (even starting hundreds and thousands of years ago) so that someone like myself would fall into the trap?" If that were the case, They are so far ahead it does not matter what we do. But I'll take the variation of Pascal's Wager and assume it isn't.
Is there physical proof of any of this? Depends on what you mean, and the question actually has less meaning than one might assume. People wave away physical proof all the time (think chemtrails).
As an example, I wonder, "If they're not doing what I think they're doing up on Mt. Graham with their L.U.C.I.F.E.R. instrument (a physical object), then can I reasonably chalk it up to coincidence?"
Final note: When I've happened to come into contact with what satanists and occultists have to say, I've paid very close attention. They're wrong about virtually all their "esoteric" knowledge in those areas where I made my discoveries. I think they're all just given different sets of lies and nonsense, and add their own lies and nonsense to pass on to the unwashed. In a way, they're worse off than the completely ignorant.
I had wondered if this paper went too far, but maybe not:
Was the Fakir a Faker? Notes on the Gandhi Psy Op (33-page PDF)
I know the vast majority will reject this, but if you're looking for a clue to correctly understanding of the Bible, in almost every usage Baal is referring to Satan.
And if anyone is going to ask for a link to some Biblical authority saying, "Hey guise, Baal = Satan, m'kay?", I can tell you it does not exist. More work is required and you have to be willing to disagree with all "authorities".
I mean, I get what you're saying but there are levels of discernment:
- agreeing with everything the authorities say
- disagreeing with everything the authorities say
- knowing when to agree and when to disagree with everything the authorities say
- same as the last, but using even their deceptions to guide you towards the truth
No one ever said it was going to be easy to get to the truth, and in my personal experience it isn't.
They don't lie about everything. In fact, I am often shocked at what they state plainly. I think, "Why don't they lie about this, mislead, cover it up? I sure would." Then I think, "Guess they're lazy and incompetent because they know no ones paying attention anyway."
IDK if it's something you'd be interested in, but the post lost me at the very first claim:
1940's brings the arrivals of some ayys noticing our nukes
I've never written it up, but if you pull all the pieces together you find out the Trinity test was faked, as were Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as was Operation Crossroads, as was the Roswell Incident.
That sounds like a tall claim until you find out all of these are tied to a single man, and he's tied directly to the CIA. I consider myself more creative than average, but I couldn't make it up if I tried. Nor would I try, even in a work of fiction, because no one would suspend disbelief.
Yeah, I remember there being a kerfuffle with Hersh over the Seth Rich story. I looked into it a little at the time and thought, "Well, that story was really pretty involved considered in it's totality and anyone can get things wrong." Being the trusting sort (at that time) I went on my way.
In hindsight, though, it fits the model for Hersh. It was and is a big story and they had to pull out one of the big guns for it. On the flip side, the next time Sy comes out with a big tale, we know They are under pressure and we should examine it very closely to see the real payload.
Seymour Hersh has become a limited hangout outlet of last resort. I have a hard time believing he's not alert enough to be aware of this, but maybe.
In this instance the message is, "The US government did not follow all the rules! But since we gotta fight these dirty Rooskies and stomp all over the Eurotrash in the process, maybe that's not such a big deal. And divers and blowing things up are cool!"
This is parallel to another such operation concerning OBL. There the message was, "Lying Obama did not give proper credit to all the foreigners who helped kill bin Laden! You know, the guy that was definitely still alive for Obama to kill and who didn't pass away from kidney failure in Tora Bora in 2001 and that we had two giant decades-long wars over. That one."
Read more here: Obama lying about Osama bin Laden’s death: Seymour Hersh (5/11/2015)
See how it works? Makes me wonder if he was handed the My Lai story long ago just to groom him. Remember, only one guy got punished over that, and just barely.
UK armed forces would last just ‘five days’ in a war, senior MP warns
But hey, I'm sure they could give it a helluva run before the survivors turn around and go home.
My reservation there is with the provenance of that particular part of the Byrd narrative. I never expended the effort to look into exactly who said what and when about the "Inner Earth" stuff, but I would consider that an important part of validating it.
I tread carefully in this way because I stumbled across the fact that "They" added a huge section to the Roswell narrative as late as 1993. And the thing is, no one else seems to have noticed. They regard it as if it was always part of the storyline.
Right, I understand that.
The notable aspect that I found is that WaPo, a major news source, prints this lengthy commentary from Michael Salla whom few have heard of, but nothing of what, say, Putin would like to say about the conflict in Ukraine. That's absurd, is it not? We should attempt to explain to ourselves why they would do that.
In other words, there are things to be learned from a story about Ike and UFOs over and above things about Ike and UFOs.
If anyone likes UFOs and doesn't want to read bad news, stop now. Okay, you had your chance....
I've recently developed reservations about all the high-profile UFO incidents like this one, Roswell, the Battle of LA, Betty and Barney Hill, etc,, that they were all government fabrications. The mere fact that this story was printed in WaPo now convinces me I was right. The overall purpose, if you're wondering, is for Project Blue Beam predictive programming and to disguise the real UFO phenomenon. And c'mon, these fucks never met a lie they didn't like.
Am I being too harsh on WaPo? I don't think so. The intent is as transparent as someone who says, "I'm no gossip, but I'll just tell you what I heard." Okay. Actually, I like Michael Salla and believe he's authentic, I just think he's wrong about a great number of things. That makes him a perfect tool to use for disinfo purposes.
If anyone read this and is disappointed, I am too. I just cannot stomach all the deception floating around and had to get it off my chest.
Personally, I always pause when I find myself on the same side of a subject as these guys:
Was Anthony Bourdain About to Expose an Elite Pedophile Ring? (Snopes 6/9/2018)
Is there anything you'd like to link us to concerning Tony?
I hate to throw cold water on anyone's ideas concerning Roswell, so if you like what you got, stop reading now.
Okay then... It was a hoax put on by the government. Just think it through a little bit starting at this announcement. Do you believe Lt. Haut just decided on his own it was a good idea to make it, or was he ordered?
If you think he was ordered to, by who? And after the big storm erupted, what happened to that person? You'd think his career would be destroyed. Was it?
And if he didn't suffer but was rather rewarded, does that not strongly suggest it was in return for his help in this plan (and others)?
You're correct, it was totally fake. What is always so odd is what they will openly admit to in the mainstream. From her wiki:
Mallon herself never believed that she was a carrier. With the help of a friend, she sent several samples to an independent New York laboratory. All came back negative for typhoid.
The science is in, eh?
Side note that you didn't see coming: I stumbled on confirmation that Anthony Bourdain was one of Them.
His followup book to Kitchen Confidential was--very bizarrely: Typhoid Mary: An Urban Historical. WTF, right? This is part of the pattern that They use Their assets and projects to support other of Their assets and projects. (That's why we should always keep our red string handy.)
This goes along with the other evidence against him: Asia Argento, his strange death, suspected son of Leonard Cohen, etc.
This is not meant to be some clever slam, but to suggest a reconsideration: maybe we should reevaluate our estimations of how advanced their tech is, how infinite their supply of money is, and the precise nature and extent of the control they have over the minds of how many humans.
Just as a quick example, their money may be infinite but resources are not. It's only a mechanism to acquire control of resources for their purposes. So as you mention academia, the more money that has flowed into it, the less legitimacy (control) that it has, because everyone with their wits about them knows these clowns are all bought and paid for.