Every time Butler comes up, I like to note two little known facts:
One is that he is one of only nineteen service members twice awarded the Medal of Honor, and for separate combat actions. Previous to that, he was also awarded the Marine Corp Brevet Medal. Marines at that time were ineligible for the Medal of Honor, but it is considered an equivalent award. That would make him the one and only "three time" winner.
Also, he was eventually driven out out the military. Must have bee for something very serious indeed, right? Well, Butler recounted a story about riding in a car with Mussolini when he ran over and killed a child without even bothering to stop.
Anyway, let this be a lesson to any past, present, or future US service members: it does not matter who you are or what you've done, your government will fuck you over as hard as they like if you cross them.
The liberals always love to talk about "inherent bias", and this is a demonstration of it. But it's their own, so of course they would never recognize it, let alone acknowledge it.
You see, have you ever noticed that we know essentially nothing about what these migrants are fleeing from? If you have the liberal mindset, you're saying, "Of course we know--all those places are shitholes!"
But there's the trouble: we know that all these refugess are fleeing because all these places are shitholes, and we know that all these places are shitholes because all the refugees are fleeing. Circular reasoning, but the only way it persists and goes unnoticed is inherent bias.
Not that these are great places, mind you, but if I said there was a country with a violent, tyrannical government spying on the citizens and controlling their lives, with their fascist cronies draining their assets at every turn, blowtorched with state propaganda night and day, prisons filled with slave labor, and which more people tried to flee every day, would you be able to guess exactly which country I'm talking about?
My point, to reiterate, is that prejudice masked as virtue is the reason all the lefties go along with Project OPEN BORDERS.
As a telltale of hoaxed events, you'll very frequently find participants who have been or are likely to have been in trouble with the law. This is the true larger context of the "known wolf" phenomenon.
There are few instances in which this can be confirmed, but I believe strongly that these people are approached with the opportunity to make their legal problems "go away". I think we see now more than ever that "selective prosecution" is quite selective and quite common, and Soros DA's would be key. The beauty is that nothing need go on the record, literally.
I have to say I think analysis of this event as evidence that Tucker is "controlled opposition" is brainless. I would pose the question, "Just when and where is evidence of this 'control' manifesting?"
That is, if "They" control Tucker, why precisely would he be allowed to speak negatively about vaxxs in the first place, other than, of course, to ultimately divert or disguise the truth? I see that no one bothers to present such analysis. So many are to engaged declaring how they were "right all along" to actually carefully reason.
One could say that the real truth is that all vaxxes are phony because viruses do not exist in the way we have been told. True enough. But ask yourself if the people that are still watching Fox News are ready for the whole "viruses don't exist" presentation. Not in my opinion.
Finally, it's not that I think he says everything he knows to everyone who will listen, but there's about 0% of people who do that. I've never actually watched his show because I find his delivery very annoying.
IDK the answer, but there was one tiny detail at that event that I think conveyed an important point about how deep The Swamp really is.
The service was breaking up and people were exchanging greetings on the way out, James "Mad Dog" Mattis, standing near Trump, was eyeballing Lindsay Graham, like really giving him the staredown. As for "Lady G", I have never seen a Senator act so uncomfortable and awkward, or even seen more than a couple of ordinary children in very big trouble behave in such a way. Could not even look Mattis in the eye.
Well, Mattis turns out to another treasonous Deep State scumbag. I discount that they staged this little interaction for the one out a million people that would catch it. I conclude that neither Trump nor anyone else could see Mattis' true colors until later.
Point is, I think basically 0% of us know with any certainty what Trump was actually dealing with, and may have to deal with again.
Each researcher will make of this what they will, but I find it strong evidence against him. I think it's more or less universally agreed by those in the know that the CIA is an evil organization, was certainly involved in the assassination of RFK Jr.'s uncle, and most like that of his father also. Yet we find this:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Says He Couldn't Be Happier for His Son to Marry Former CIA Officer Amaryllis Fox (6/26/2018)
Additionally, the water gets even deeper for RFK Jr. because the assassination of his father was faked. Does he really not know--or even have his suspicions--after all these years? For me, the only way it adds up is that we're dealing with a family of many lifetime actors. JFK rejected his role, though, and paid the price.
On a positive note, RFK Jr. has certainly said many things damaging to the interests of the Cabal in their efforts to retain him as an influencer. That in itself shows how low on assets and desperate They are.
My estimation is that, as part of the larger crypto op, They have got to keep the market the market looking "alive" with price action, and let a little money slosh back and forth from the pockets of the peasants. That'll keep them "spreading the good word" and doing the work of "Them" by flogging crypto to other peasants. It also works secondarily as a smoke screen for the true market, whatever that may be.
Deception is the supreme art of war.
I have to say I pretty much reject outright any suggestion "They" are trying to provoke revolt or any other such thing. I would base that on these grounds:
-
If They want some "major event", They don't need to provoke it, They'll just manufacture it like J6. The day of, that probably required only 100 or so personnel on the ground.
-
Everything They do is based on higher degrees of predictability. That's what everything from "track and trace" to CDBC to getting rid of cars that didn't have built-in 3G cell connections is all about. They monitor so They may predict.
Unleashing any form of chaos is antithetical to that, and only to be used extremely judiciously. Most importantly, that's where it may be shut off instantly. Don't hear from the riotous BLM any more, do you? Of course not, it was shut off.
If real shooting starts with real bullets, I could not even begin to predict how it would unfold and I am certain They could not either. Frankly, I think it's the very last thing They want.
It strikes me as a reflection that we're tipping (<--haha, but it's not funny) from one type of society to another. We grew up in one where we considered ourselves participants in a larger group, that our prosperity was ultimately tied to that of everyone else, and that we were gratified by being gracious and generous to one another.
Now we're devolving to a society where other people are means, not ends. We try to "get over" on each other. The sum gets asymptotically closer to zero.
This concept of hylics was about the only thing the Gnostics were correct about. It was the truth to bait the hook for the rest of their nonsense. You'll find this three-way division of levels of consciousness in other philosophies like that of the Essenes, and manifested in various ways like hypnotizability. Gathering it all together, you find about 80% are hylics, 16% psychics, and 4% pneumatics.
I cannot caution anyone enough not to take the word of the Gnostics for anything else regarding this other than the structure. Take, for example, this line from the "Hylics" wiki page:
Somatics were deemed completely bound to matter.
"Deemed" by who, the Gnostics? And who gave them fiat power in this? No answer to that because it's nonsense.
No one studies consciousness in this way because it is one of "Their" biggest secrets. Were the truth of this to be commonly understood, and commonly understood to be commonly understood, then the psychics and pneumatics would think about the world very differently and make very different decisions. That would be the absolutely final death knell of the Cabal.
Who knows what the Russians plan to do, but I think the start of all the shooting defined the end of them trying to tell everyone what their plans were to get them to go along.
And I always figure they know a hell of a lot more about the situation than I do, but it seems that if they leave Transnistria just hanging out there, that's going to be the next target for more years of easy, murderous provocation. It doesn't even have to be Ukraine or even Poland used for the next round, because to effect that plan there are already enough psychopaths installed in positions of power and in thrall to the West in Moldova and Romania. Last I heard (and I don't keep up), there were already four US bases in Romania.
I get the feeling we're at the point now where quite a few people--everyone from these cops in the UK to Alvin Bragg in Manhattan--are mentally calculating, "What are the chances someone's going to come kick down my door if I just go along with this?" For pretty much all of them, the answer at present is, "There's not a chance of that, so I guess there's not really a problem."
Each of us can make us this what they will.
My support is for the Galactic Empire over the Alliance invasion. PERIOD.
Seriously, though, without suggesting it was planned this way, everyone should compare Die Schwarze Sonne to this: The insignia of the First Galactic Empire in the fictional Star Wars universe.
It's just that they do not not look alike.
This is all really beyond the forefront. I only know of one other researcher working on it: "Korben Dallas", who runs the stolenhistory.org website. IMHO, he's got a lot of things wrong about who "the Controllers" are and how the big picture fits together, but that's going to happen when you're hacking your way through the jungle. Aside from that, his work and the rest of the site are mind-blowing and a gold mine. Wander around there for a while and you'll have a very hard time after that taking any conventional history at face value.
The last time i was active on the site was a few years ago, so surely there have been developments since then, but Dallas was only beginning to see the mud flood as a weapon. No one, including myself, had any speculation as to how it may have worked. You'll develop your own ideas, but a couple of seemingly likely directions can (IMO) be thrown out.
First is the straightforward idea of liquefaction, as in an earthquake. There are indeed a handful of buildings that are tilting, such a the Leaning Tower of Pisa, but all the rest of straight and level. Liquefaction always induces racking and then tilting before collapse and there's no evidence of this in innumerable mud flooded buildings.
Which brings up the concept of "flood" itself. A flood, like a tsunami, would damage buildings, knock them off their foundations, etc, and there's no evidence of that. Fatally, though, there are many mud flood building on flat plains and on top of rises, so it seems there's nowhere from which the mud could have flooded.
Even a heavy precipitation of rocks and dirt does't seem likely, like ejecta from a comet strike or some such. I would think that that would not only collapse the roofs, but take part of the upper walls with them. Again, no evidence.
All of this analysis is just how it appears "to my eyes" at the current time. We're left with perhaps some sort of relatively slow "dust storm" phenomenon. The thing I'd like to look at is the character of the "mud" next to buildings. Is it all fine particulates, or are there sizable rocks and boulders mixed in?
So how did the Tartarians fall to, well, the Satanists that rule us now? It's a big black hole you're trying to draw evidence out of. But I urge you to study the architecture closely: only a noble and magnificent people could have dreamt such wonders, let alone actually created them to stand flawlessly before us centuries later. I have a hard time even imagining what they were like, but it does bring to mind how far we have all fallen or--more fairly to say--been cast down.
But I take the dismay I feel at what has been lost and flip it around to realize that it is just out of reach, barely out of living memory, and that what has fallen may be restored. Take a good look at photos of the "world's fairs" at the end of the 19th Century. Clearly, the societies that built these cities lived in all we need know of an Earthly Paradise.
Yes, correct, it seems like it finally put an end to the Tartarians.
You can sort of "back into" the weapon argument this way: The mud flood put an end to the Tartarians. All the mud flood history has been virtually eradicated. Do bad guys or good guys eradicate history? Bad guys, right? And who writes history? The victors, of course. So if the bad guys won a war over the Tartarians, and the mud flood ended the Tartarians, it would be quite an astonishing coincidence if the mud flood was a natural disaster and not in fact a weapon.
Two more factors are consistent with this analysis. One is that the mud flood is found at locations all over the globe, and it was almost entirely confined to cities. A natural disaster would leave all kinds of things buried in the soil, not just buildings.
Second, and I admit this is judgement but it's very clear to me, the Tartarian architecture left behind is beyond magnificent. Glorious artistry and craftsmanship beyond compare. Every building is of a type, yet all unique. Even water towers and stables are more beautiful than any building you've ever seen constructed.
So the current rulers, the winners of that war that erased the memory of their enemy, are they creative enough to have made these? Quite the opposite. All architecture, art, music, etc, is increasingly degrading, debased, dehumanizing, disgusting. A civilization of exceeding beauty was destroyed with what we can only imagine was a sort of "doomsday weapon".
It's a huge thing, undeniable. Once you see the evidence, you can;t see unsee it. There are three mud flooded buildings in the city near which I live, and one in the small suburb where my house is.
What's disturbing is that it's not like it's something you only see on the Internet. It's real, right there, in this rando city and suburb. You can't dismiss it like, "That YouTube guy is just a shill! He's working for the Cabal!" And I'll just take it at face value, so to speak, because if the Cabal arranged false evidence that's been there my entire life to fool a handful of people in the far future, we're all fucked anyway.
It's also clear that the Capitol, the White House and the Executive Office Building across the street were all mud flooded, but there is not a single word in the official histories as to when and how this happened. That's disturbing.
If you choose to research this, you'll also open your eyes to events like the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes. If you've never heard of it, you'll think you really should have when you find out that the Mississippi River ran backwards for 3 days after it. If this was part of the war, they successfully rewrote a huge strike, and the weapon was of unimaginable power.
Look up Ewaranon on YT, something like "Lost History of the Flat Earth" .He's disinfo, yes, selling FE, but there's excellent content documenting the reset of the 1800's. Trust me, you'll be heartbroken seeing what has been stolen from us.
Personally, I feel right now that the idea of an imminent cataclysm is entirely a red herring. There's a longer discussion to be had, of course, but I have seen not a piece of evidence come along that can be accounted for solely, or even most likely, by such a future event.
Rather, what I do spend a lot of time thinking about is the "mud flood". If there was a coming cataclysm, that would be it. Even more worrisome is that it appears to have been a weapon, and that it depopulated much of the world. Really worrisome is that it was used as recently as the 19th Century, that it has been used many times before, and that it has been virtually erased from history. Overarchingly worrisome are the potential circumstances in which it could be used again.
All in all, if I were the potential user of such a weapon, I'd want everyone talking all the time about all these other nonsensical existential threats instead of the real one, and looking for me. Deception is, after all, the ultimate art of war.
Well, in a larger sense, I'm only involved in trying to account for evidence we have at hand. I'm willing to speculate anything, but only so far as it provides a potentially falsifiable, well-defined hypothesis, or would at least serve as a framework for developing one.
There's a problem with introducing an all -powerful creator being into that. It's not that there isn't one because there are certain indications that there is, but as far as analysis you just handed yourself the ultimate wild card. Every single fact and circumstance can simply be explained as, "God willed it to be thus." Actual analysis becomes completely arbitrary, if not flushed right down the toilet. Just think of how liberals have a secret invisible asterisk at the end of every one of their statements. Do you want to be like them?
As far as the nature of consciousness, the biggest tip of the hand was the show "Westworld". We clearly see it as a technology that can be manipulated externally. If we look judiciously around at the current world and through history, we can find evidence of exactly that happening.
One might also analogize it to eyesight. We start with an in-built, "natural" facility. Note that different people have different characteristics, and some are even color-blind. We can augment it with everything from eyeglasses to telescopes and microscopes. With lasik and RK, we can also alter it in ways undetectable to all but specialists, who would need to examine the person carefully.
To sum up, instead of trying to "get somewhere", I simply try to make sense of what is already before me. When and as that is done and done well, where to look next is usually not much of an issue.
I would guess it's real, and what I base that on is that DeSantis is a rival to Trump, Trump was stunningly popular among ordinary Jews, and ordinary Jews can be quite outspoken.
What I am reminded of is when a Jewish film director was literally booed offstage for badmouthing Trump. At a KKK meeting is Alabammy? No, it was at the Israeli Film Festival in Los Angeles. Such anti-Semitism did not get any media coverage, for some reason.
Oh, haha , I get it! You subtly imply that I'm basing my "beliefs" on literally nothing.
See how the manipulation is accomplished, folks? Although not as effective when it's pointed out, I suppose.