3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

One thing I've noticed about the rumors this time is that the Zionists are telling every one they can think up. Personally, I think that means (1) none of them are true and (2) they are very desperate indeed.

What's funny is that this tends to confirm for me that the Supreme Leader is dead (and has caused events to go a way other than according to plan). That's the obvious rumor to monger, right? I heard it one time a few days ago and never since. Remember when Putin was dead and dying and insane and in hiding and had fled the country? But not the Ayatollah, huh?

My guess is that power has now gone to the Guardian Council, and that it's full of hardliners, and that they're willing to have it out using their giant missile inventory. It also looks like US bases in the Gulf have been evacuated and Huckabee is rushing American citizens out. Israelis are crashing the exits themselves. An Armageddon of sorts, just not the one They expected.

So, you know, back to the "very desperate indeed".

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

nobody cares that you exist

Cared enough about your damaged ego to reply, didn't you? Way to refute yourself, moron. And now everyone sees it on your permanent record lololololololol

You are forbidden from reading or replying to anything I write in the future. I will report you if you cannot control yourself. byeeeeeeeee!

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great! I think we need to get what we can out there because (((they're))) cranking down the volume:

Israel Cracks Down on Foreign Media Outlets with New 'Zero Tolerance' Censorship Policy (Western Journal 6/20/2025)

I wouldn't be surprised if they start jamming their own cellphones before this is all over.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

This story analyzes the video and describes the type of weapon used:

Advanced Iranian Warheads Deployed (Winter Watch 6/20/2025)

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

To make it safe and effective, it's got deep sea luminescent squid DNA spliced into it. Just as God intended.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jesus Christ, at least I don't get on the Internet to be an asshole. What a hero! lolololololol

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very interesting, to tie together a couple of things you mentioned.

I'm completely of the view that the beginning of the Younger Dryas was one and the same event as the Biblical Flood. We just have to keep in mind that there is a big cloud of smoke that intentionally obscures research on what, to me, is simply a historical occurrence much like any other.

But I've wondered where the word "Aryan" originally came from. Where I've landed on that is the same place Noah is said to have landed: Mount Ararat. No coincidence, in my mind.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fort Knox guy: "Look, there's not even one pile of gold in there that we can photograph from different angles and tell people that it's however many piles of gold we're supposed to have."

Trump representative: "We can't tell people that. They'll just freak out. Everyone just stop talking about this and we'll get back to it later."

Fort Knox guy: "Silver lining: we have tons of room if you need to store White House holiday decorations or whatever. Place is already paid for."

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think only at the very highest levels, and even then just a handful of people. Frankly, it may be zero. Better everyone in their service just believes they're serving some type of "deities". I believe humans are quite literally programmed for that.

I don't know if you picked this up in any of my posts in the last year or two, but they have involved documenting the activities of a set of generational Satanist families that have been active in America for over four centuries. The family that has become most prominent is the Parkers.

Just to give you some idea of the scope: On one end, the guy in command of the militia at the Battle of Lexington was John Parker. On the other end, I found five Parkers involved in the dumb Luigi Mangione psyop. They are scattered all through history.

The point is, many years ago I heard an interview on THC with a guy that had broken away from the generational Satanist family into which he had been born. His name is Jay Parker and he's still around giving interviews.

The point is, my work did not come from anything he mentioned. I only put two and two together later on. He seems to have no idea whatsoever what his family has been up to over literally centuries. That's how in the dark these people are kept. No need to know, you know?

I think that in the end, They just need people that do what they're told and go along with the program. Policy is formed only at the highest levels, all else is implementation.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's so, so hard to say, but I think the number that actually knows the whole story is very tiny. I can count on one hand the number of times in years and years that some Elite has even vaguely alluded to knowing any of the deeper truths I've dug up about what's going on.

In fact, I've come to the hypothesis that the Elites at each different level are just handed different sets of lies, each containing a bit more truth. For their own good, I think they all put themselves in the state of mind where they know these are lies and believe them too. Sort of a 1984-style "2+2=5" thing.

What really gets me is that (long story) the final war against the Tartarians took place throughout the 1800's. That's just out of living memory, but it has successfully been almost entirely erased. Then again, that seems close enough that we can get it back.

Speaking of lost ancient technologies, people think in terms of airships and free energy and stuff like that, but I heard the kookiest/most intriguing one recently. Someone finally noticed that none of these old Tartarian buildings have toilets. Crazy, right?

But they paired that up with the "fireplaces" that--upon inspection--do not appear designed to have fires in them. The speculation is that the "fireplaces" brought in a certain kind of energy that the inhabitants could somehow absorb. Thus, they never needed to eat and did not need to poop.

I keep getting more and more of a feeling that the world not long gone from us was stranger than any of us could easily imagine.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you have to keep the origin and "Deep State" of the Soviet Union in mind. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote in "200 Years Together":

You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse...It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time.

Solzhenitsyn points towards the Jews, but I'm just saying that the Jews were a tool--like any other tool "They" can get hold of--and it goes one level deeper.

I forgot to mention in the original comment that WW2 was about 80% Germany vs Russia. "They" got a two-fer, because to add to what Solzhenitsyn mentions, I would say that by involving the USSR in the war, They had arranged for the slaughter of tens of millions more ethic Russians and Christians, less obviously this time. And the country also got stomped into the dirt.

So the question would be, how much of this true history is known at the highest levels of the Russian Federation? It's essentially impossible to say, and even in normal circumstances Russians play their cards extremely close to the vest. But if I had to guess, I'd say maybe a dozen or two in a very tight inner circle.

You'd have to keep it small because they simply cannot afford to be compromised. But more than that, how many people are ready to believe any of this? The percentage rounds down to zero.

And in the meantime, Putin has to try to drag along a country of 150m with it's own Deep State, and fight an enormous war against the whole of NATO (with Ukrainian triggermen), and keep BRICS going, etc, etc.

The closest I've ever seen him come to publicly admitting how much he knows was back in September 2022:

"Such a total denial of a human being, a rejection of faith and traditional values, suppression of freedom begins to look like a perverted religion, outright Satanism."

Since Satan is at the head of the faction of Elohim that's causing all the trouble, he's correct. And I think he said about as much as can be said to the general public these days.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just wanted to throw out a related working hypothesis, which turns out to be relevant to events in the world today. There are two nations that "They" (however one chooses to identify them) are out-and-out maniacally hell-bent on destroying: Iran and Russia.

I say "maniacally" with specific meaning. Their zealous hatred and single-minded compulsion is beyond any reasonable human motives: money, religion, politics, commerce, natural resources, bigotry, imperialism, etc. And it's the same for both countries, even though they would seem to have almost nothing in common. Except....

Iran is indeed the Land of the Aryans, but how about Russia? For researchers of the theory, Russia was the ancestral heartland of Great Tartary, home of the Tartarians. This is key: I suspect now that the word "tartarian" is some corruption of "The Aryans". This is to say that both these countries were strongholds of the Aryans.

This additionally ties into one of the big results of WW2. We're propagandized to the level of faith that the National Socialists were bent on creating a "white superman". Research shows that to be nonsense, aside from them trying to create the conditions for the prosperity and development of the Germanic people.

They were, however, interested in their origins, which indeed seem to have been from--once again--the Aryans. So we come out of that era with Germany, inheritors of the Aryans, stomped into a mudhole, while we also all know instinctively to hate and fear all things "Aryan".

We really seem to have something of a trifecta here, don't we?

The point is that perhaps all these wars were and are in reality prosecuted by "hidden forces" against the heirs and remnants of the Aryans, to put them down once and for all.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would add this to the whole thesis about Israel nuking Fordow, which just happened but I found it after I posted:

Israel wants to annihilate Iranian nuclear facilities before talks – ambassador: Any consideration of peace talks must come after Iran loses the capability to pursue the program, Simona Halperin has told RT (RT 6/16/2025)

My guess is that Israel needs to obliterate Fordow not because Iran is building a A-bomb there, but because if the facility is reduced to a pile of smoking, radioactive wreckage, then no one can examine the site (Iran, IAEA, US, whoever) to dispute their claims.

That would be a desperate gamble but I think they're there.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kent State in a way puts me in mind of UC Berkeley. That place goes from the well-spring of the Free Speech Movement to chasing Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter off campus with threats of violence.

It's all somehow supposedly in the name of "liberalism", and you can get all twisted up trying to figure out how liberalism got so twisted up. Now I see it much more simply: Intelligence was dug in there running whatever the social engineering program of the day was, and everyone is just told it's liberalism.

You've seen how weird all this research has gotten and the vast majority would never believe it now matter how much evidence they're shown, but for me the world has become simpler and makes more sense. That's the most ironic result of all... lol

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

I believe something deeper is going on.

I haven't had time to research it yet--let alone write it up--but it looks like Israel just nuked Iran:

Reports of 'massive blast,' 2.5 magnitude earthquake in vicinity of Iran's Fordow nuclear plant:Reports of an earthquake in Qom, near the Fordow nuclear facility (i24 News 6/15/2025)

Really, just try to unpack the headline. A giant blast and an earthquake? Conventional bombs don't cause quakes, and quakes don't cause massive blasts. How many explanations can there be?

My guess is that Trump believes these maniacs have finally come so far off their hinges that they're going to drop a few in Tehran. Maybe they'll blame the dumb ragheads for improper fertilizer storage practices.

Everyone can interpret all these events as they wish, but I'm not at all surprised to see Trump saying this: the right thing for the wrong reason that everyone still chooses to believe.

UPDATE: It looks like someone noticed Trump was worried at the G7, and I suppose the possibility of Tehran getting nuked would be worrisome to a normally functioning human:

Something is definitely bothering Trump (Lunatic Outpost 6/16/2025)

ANOTHER UPDATE: It looks like his worry was (regrettably) well justified, because they went ahead and did it:

Biggest explosion ??? in Tehran so far... Is this a nuclear attack??? (Lunatic Outpost 6/16/2025)

Again, everyone gets to tell themselves whatever they wish about this remarkable series of events, even that they are all unrelated and unremarkable.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Over a decade ago, I identified Putin as the most crucial figure in world affairs, and has since been eclipsed only by Trump, but then again you cannot and should not really compare the two. But because of that, I really started to build a dossier (if you will) on him to figure out, "Just who TF is this guy?

From an information warfare perspective, if Putin truly was an enemy of "Them" (whoever "They" are that's causing all this pain and insanity), then they would seek to undermine and blackwash him any way possible, using anything that served. That would include, of course, attempting to depict him as a tool of the Jews to those who thought "They = Jews" and were looking for evidence to back that up.

If you're open to the possibility that Putin is not, in fact, such a tool and has only been painted as one, then read on for some of the material I thought was relevant. The first would be a thoughtful article on the nuanced situation:

Putin and Zionism: A Complex Relationship (12/23/2015)

Even more nuanced would be the question, "Is Putin a Christian?" To begin, I've lost the link where he recounts the story of his mother secretly (being Soviet times) taking him to be baptized as a baby.

Then there's a brief list I've collected from various sources at various times which I believe helps characterize his attitude towards religion:

The Latest: Putin visits new Orthodox Church in Paris (5/29/2017)

'Aggressors Will Be Annihilated, We Will Go to Heaven as Martyrs,' Putin Says (10/19/2018)

Why Putin’s Christian Faith Is Most Likely Authentic (4/6/2019)

Interview with The Financial Times: On the eve of the G20 summit, Vladimir Putin spoke with The Financial Times Editor Lionel Barber and Moscow Bureau Chief Henry Foy. (6/27/2019)

Billboards Featuring Putin Holding Quran Appear in Lebanese Cities (7/9/2023)

The Putin I Know: Soon after his first term, Putin worked to hasten the reestablishment of unity within the Russian Church which had separated during the Revolution, with part in the Diaspora and the other part in Russia. (1/5/2023)

We simply cannot know what is in another's heart, but the picture that builds up is perhaps summed up a bit in a quote from the Financial Times interview:

All right, have we forgotten that all of us live in a world based on Biblical values? Even atheists and everyone else live in this world. We do not have to think about this every day, attend church and pray, thereby showing that we are devout Christians or Muslims or Jews. However, deep inside, there must be some fundamental human rules and moral values. In this sense, traditional values are more stable and more important for millions of people than this liberal idea, which, in my opinion, is really ceasing to exist.

This is much like John Adams said, that the US Constitution is suited only for a religious people. Now and into the foreseeable future, these structures and institutions are required to keep the vast majority of people in society on the "straight and narrow". Destruction of that leads to chaos.

Putin is one hell of a cool customer, and he certainly knows how to play along when it is needful. But to think he has any sympathy for or would aid in the advancement of Zionism, surely the single biggest point-source of chaos in the world today? Whether he says it or not, I would say there's no way.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

For those that may not recognize him, that's Apti Alaudinov, commander of the Akhmat special forces units operating in the hotspots of the SMO like Mariupol and most recently Kursk.

He's Chechen and Muslim, a follower of Ramzan Kadyrov and fiercely loyal to the Russian Federation. Kadyrov is, in turn, Putin's stoutest ally, and I personally wouldn't dare to say a bad word about Putin in front of him.

After the Chechen Wars, rather than harbor bitterness, the Chechens felt that they had found a nation and leadership worthy of their loyalty. If there are anything like fanatics in the RF, that's Akhmat.

I recall one of them interviewed near the end of the Battle of Mariupol, where they had fought and defeated the Azov neo-Nazis who had been deeply dug in. He described a bit of the brutality he had witnessed then said something like, "We have to hunt them all down and kill them, all the 'shaitans', wherever they are. And we will."

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've got quite a number of links saved, but just sort of looking at the sites I see a lot of https://www.presstv.ir/ and https://www.tasnimnews.com/en. Right from the horse's mouth. Iranian officials make a ton of bold statements all the time, but the reporting doesn't read like propaganda. Funny juxtaposition. You can browse around there to build up a picture for yourself.

This headline caught my eye yesterday:

Fox News Correspondent Describes Iran's Retribution Against Israel: 'Truly Unspeakable'

The Western Journal is good but they're Christian Zionists, You'd think they wouldn't even want to repeat something like that but there it is.

I found several articles on https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/ just today, so browse around there too. Funny you mention Ritter because they link to his videos fairly often and just yesterday they linked:

Scott Ritter: US Used Nuclear Talks to Set Up Israeli Strike on Iran

Ritter is really knowledgeable and right about a lot of stuff, but also dead wrong on a lot, including this. There's a longer argument to be made, but it looks like the meetings were for Iran and the US to set up for the Iranian counterstrike on Israel. IOW, just the opposite of what everyone thinks.

Finally, you might also try https://militarywatchmagazine.com/. It's from a straight up military perspective, but they cover things that seem to "get left out" before they hit either the mainstream or alternative media. Like Iran shooting down a third F-35 and capturing a second pilot. No one talks about that, right?

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Israel is getting repeatedly kicked in the balls, the worst damage it has ever suffered in it's entire history.

What's hilarious to me is that the Jew media says how great it's going for the Jews in Israel and every anti-Jew around here believes it all without reservation.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

On r/conspiracy, the traffic I've suspected to be phony is "Conspiracy 101" stuff just endlessly recycled: "bill gates = bad", "hillary = bad", "jack ruby was a jew", "anything about crowley", etc.

But then the reason all this manufactured traffic works so well is that the vast majority of conspiracy theorists aren't really looking for theories or theorizing themselves, they're just looking for something to react to.

Similarly (venting here), I'm listening to the latest episode of THC--considered to be a flagship conspiracy podcast--and this bullshit artist is droning on about the alien councils in control of the Earth or whatever while Greg Carlwood and the audience go, "Whoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!"

A dispiriting state of affairs.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correcting the name, a post on Reddit was made the same claim a year ago:

(Israeli billionaire) Abramovich was the first person to recommend to Yeltsin that Vladimir Putin be his successor as the Russian president. When Putin formed his first cabinet as Prime Minister in 1999, Abramovich interviewed each of the candidates for cabinet positions before they were approved. (r/conspiracy 3/31/2024)

That post was deleted by the user. Everyone is free to decide whether it's paid shills or just dumdums that keep repeating it.

For anyone interested enough to want to dig a bit deeper into actual reality, there is this article concerning Valentin Yumashev, the person standing right next to Yeltsin guiding him on this issue:

The man who helped make ex-KGB officer Vladimir Putin a president (BBC 12/16/2019)

Every time the name Putin comes up, the shills shout "KGB" like the robots they are, but the article includes this interesting quote:

"A lot of KGB agents, like Putin, had left the organisation, realising it was discredited. The fact that he was ex-KGB meant nothing. Putin had shown himself to be a liberal and a democrat, who wanted to continue market reforms."

The anti-Putin drones should start shouting that he's a Democrat, because that seems a lot worse these days.

7
Primate98 7 points ago +7 / -0

After having tried a couple of other forums, it's worse everywhere else. That was after looking at a dozen more that weren't even close to being worth trying. It's also worth noting that I also tried a couple of conspiracy podcast forums and they're just as infiltrated and stupid as Reddit.

If anyone is interested, I would estimate that there are about 10 "normal" people here. Not that I would agree with them or they would agree with me, but I'm just saying that the other few dozen are loons, crusaders and shills, completely uninterested in anything other than shouting whatever nonsense is echoing around their heads and needs to get out. Similarly, on r/conspiracy, I would estimate there are about 1% "normal" users, but with far more bots and paid shills.

In the 1997 movie "Conspiracy Theory", Mel Gibson's newsletter has five subscribers, so I guess I'm right on track. Watch your back, upvoters!

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the parallel holds true, it would mean something like, "Vote Vance 2050". Seems pretty surreal. Then again, Putin has been a body double for 15 years, so that's surreal too.

Strange world we live in.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›