Reddit is fucked
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Frankly, it's surreal. It's like this was AI-generated, created from prompts given by an awake and aware person for what they would like to see happen.
Personal confession: a video similar to this one was posted on r//conspiracy_commons, and several of the Redditors "debunked" it as from years ago or some such claim, and I believed it.
On a serious note, I think Trump did not have a very good idea of what he was up against in 2015. He severely underestimated Them and ultimately he--and all the rest of us--came out on the losing end. This time around, any sort of "middle-grounding" or negotiation or artful wording or saying without saying is out the window.
Fat lot of fucking good it did any of us last time.
a) Nature WAS perceivable before anyone within can suggest what something IS...like surrealism.
b) Real implies ones response (re) to all (al)...sur (beyond) implies being yonder aka within sight, yet not near aka perceivable in sight, yet ignored for suggested.
Only nature generates...artifice is shaped within what nature generates.
a) One implies different from one another.
b) Video/videre - "to see" implies ones perception within all perceivable...not looking at a suggested video.
Rest implies "reminder after separation"...ALL implies that which separates into each ONE within, hence "before" not after, and before implies forwards (inception towards death) being (life) aka the internal separation of all into each one.
The opposite of sort implies differentiation. Few tempt many together aka casting lots aka sorting shares to equalize differences among them, hence making many "similar" to each other.
As for natural differentiation...sides (inception/death) generate middle-ground (life). What do moving sides imply? Balance! What's the center of balance? Choice!
Artificial (words) tempts one to ignore natural (sound)...
Fucking (coming together) good vs bad (conflict of reason)...choosing a suggested side fucks oneself over. Choice needs to balance, not fight other choices withing imbalance (want vs not want).
In alchemy there's a process where "contrasting elements in proper proportion neutralize each other"...it's called neutral/neuter - "neither of two". If only ONE had the free will of choice to choose neither of two...