Are Jews Mad? Jewish Encyclopedia
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
You want to think (well, at least I want to think) that people are all the same and we should understand that and act accordingly. That seems like the right way to be. In the case of Jews, if someone is born into it, they pretty much just go along with the program just as the vast majority of Christians, Muslims, and whoever else do.
Regrettably, that does not seem to be quite the case. Further, I do not think we advance the cause of Truth and the alleviation of human suffering by ignoring truth wherever and however we find it.
Thus, there really does seem to be a "problem":
Haaretz report suggests up to 40% of Ashkenazi Jews may suffer from mental disorders like schizophrenia (Newstarget 10/21/2024)
Had they been more mentally stable things would have been much better even if they still ruled the world. The way they are running the planet indicates they truly are pursuing insane goals.
I consider it as evidence giving insight into the true history of our planet. Exactly what it is evidence of, I don't yet know.
It seem to be consistent with certain aspects of the general narrative of the Bible, especially the OT: a segregated population, forbidden from freely interbreeding with neighbors, a firm distinction between themselves and "goyim" and not necessarily as the result of a social construct, and the idea that it is their consciousness that's different.
I can't help but think of Jerry Marzinski's work, and his conclusion that schizophrenia is, in most cases, demonic possession. I should further hasten to say that I don't think that the concept of "demonic possession" should be left at "evil spirits".
Evident/exvidere - "out of seeing", hence to know - "to perceive"...looking at suggested evidence contradicts that.
I implies holding onto that which nature set apart from one another aka oneself. Consider aka siding together tempts one to join others, while ignoring to be set apart from one another.
All perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another, while any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore that.
Aka standing (stance) together (con)...an inversion of standing apart from one another, hence being enabled to balance as choice freely.
Suggested narration contradicts perceivable generation...if one consents to hold onto it.
Nature doesn't narrate (utter words) it generates by moving sound.
a) A jew suggests populism to tempt freely consenting gentiles together on segregated fields, which are bound together within a conflict of reason against each other, which a jew exploits to tempt the further mixing together of gentiles in controlled environments aka herding cattle.
b) Breed/bhreu - "to boil, bubble, effervesce, burn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/breed#etymonline_v_17087
Mixing implies "blend promiscuously into one mass"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=mix which inverts nature setting each one within apart from one another, hence each being standing out from one another aka being special as opposed to COMMON.
Interbreeding implies a jew using alchemy to bring gentiles to a boiling point aka a burned offering of the living (ingredients) back into the process of dying (base). Real growth implies singular resistance, fake growth implies plural aggregation into a bubble ready to be busted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tdyU_gW6WE
Natural order implies stable (balance)...each mind within wields the choice to stabilize (balancing) by adaptation aka alternation aka separation aka transformation etc.
THEY implies suggested pluralism, and MORE implies ones singular consent to reason (more vs less) about it against others...that's mentally unstable.
A jew suggests goals (outcomes) to tempt gentiles to ignore perceivable origin. Suggested "truth" for example tempts one to hold onto it, while defending it from the onslaught of lies until kingdom come...aka pursuing fiction (suggestion) within a circle (logic) while mutually fighting others (reason).
Insane aka in sanus - "within sound"...that's what a gentile ignores (origin of being) when consenting to a jewish suggestion.
Only flow (inception towards death) runs form (life) into shapes...ones consent to a suggested form (planet), while ignoring perceivable flow (plane) permits another to shift shapes.
People implies an aggregate of many together, which can only exist a) by each different person joining and b) by few remaining apart, hence different from the "same" people.
Do you see the trick of few tempting many together aka aggregating them?
Meanwhile in reality... each person (different); many persons (alike) per-sonos aka by sound (same).
Action sets reactions apart from one another...suggested accord tempts together, while permitting few to attach A CORD upon many aka a string to puppeteer by a hidden hand.
a) Seem/sem - "semblance; sameness" tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
b) Ones perception SEES differentiation; the suggestions by others SEEM the same if one consents. A jew suggests what SEEMS as a SEAM upon what a gentile actually SEES.
b) Being (life) within way (inception towards death) implies differentiation...not likeness, hence differ/disferre - "carrying apart; away from".
a) Each one (perception) is born into all (perceivable)...a jew tempts gentiles into a case (suggested), while using suggested progressivism to tempt them out of being.
In other words...consenting to a suggestion permits others to dangle the suggested in front of ones eyes, while one chases after it. This CHASE for outcomes implies the CASE concealing ones mind from origin.
b) Being (life) born into it (inception towards death) implies as temporary growth into ongoing loss...the origin cannot be blamed for lack of growth. Blaming aka finding a fault implies holding onto something, hence faulting self for lack of growing.
Being (life) going along with origin (inception towards death) dies faster...a jew suggests program/prographein - "to write forth" to tempt consenting gentiles to follow leaders along towards outcome.
Consenting to follow a suggestion, while ignoring to resist origin implies each ones free will of choice.
If one ignores to discern for self that life is being moved towards death, for chasing towards alternative outcomes, then who is to blame but oneself?
Notice that you view jews as THEY aka as an aggregate of people, while ignoring that gentiles are the larger aggregate, and that the chosen few imply a people apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Religion/religio - "to bind anew"...a jew tempts gentiles to bind each other together, which in return permits a jew to control those in bondage; those bound together; those within a BUND... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundism
Cause advances thinking, hence delivering input for thought. A jew suggests nihilism (not) and pluralism (we) and progressivism (advance) to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore perception for suggestion.
Suffer; verb - "allow to occur or continue, refrain from hindering, fail to prevent or suppress"...life being moved from inception towards death can not suffer (prevent origin); only suffocate (deprive of) self by denying reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion).
Consenting to hold onto a suggestion implies ones denial of being moved...that's self imposed suffering.
Change advances...truth and lies tempt one to hold onto it (circular logic); fighting others for it (conflicts of reason), while ignoring change aka alternation/differentiation/separation/transformation etc.
Being implies problem (life) during solution (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain self. A jew suggests gentiles to ignore HERE (as problem within solution) for THERE (solution to problem) to invert reality by sending those within to chase after fiction.