TL;DR: The early parts of the US atomic bomb program were run by General Leslie Groves, and his ancestry—like so many other Spook Families—traces back to the Salem Witch Trials. Those trials were fake, as were those initial “nukes”. We will also reintroduce ourselves to Deak Parsons, of the very Spooky Parsons Dynasty. The angle here is that “They” used Their own to oversee this grand atomic deception.
Just how the hell did I get here: I was way down at what I thought was bedrock and then found out that Groves was related to Linda Moulton-Howe. Surprising in itself, right? I was writing up so much on her I had to break off this atomic bomb angle. That’s how deep this all goes. You’ll have to temporarily take my word that there is much more to be said about good old Linda.
To begin to rebuild some semblance of real history, we’ll have to stipulate some items you may not be familiar with: the Salem Witch Trials were faked (17-page PDF), as were the Trinity test (16-page PDF), the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the first phase of the nuclear tests at Bikini Atoll (11-page PDF), known as Operation Crossroads. As for H&N, there is plentiful research on its fakery, easy to find, which is why there’s no specific link.
Disclaimer: All the preceding PDF links are classic papers from our gold-standard, the highest-level disinfo agent and revealer of hidden secrets, Miles Mathis. The standard caveat is that he surfaces plenty of evidence that you can independently validate, but you should accept no conclusions on his word alone and be conscious of the directions he’s pushing you.
Additional disclaimer: All American atomic bombs and nuclear power after this time—about 1946—are legitimate. Apparently, they didn’t have real ones finished during these early years when they were required by the scripting, so they simply faked it.
To begin, what seems like a helluva long time ago but I now see was only six weeks, we met the other Spook standing just outside history’s spotlight controlling events, the “Atomic Admiral” himself:
Captain Deak Parsons, the triggerman for the (fake) atomic bombing of Hiroshima and involved in all the other atomic fakery, was related to Jack Parsons and all the other historical fakery (conspiracies.win 10/7/2024)
We now see that all early atomic fakery (including the Manhattan Project, Trinity, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Crossroads) took place when this guy had control over it: General Leslie Richard Groves Jr. (1896-1970). He was Matt Damon in Oppenheimer, if that helps you place him.
The genealogy of Lt.Gen. Leslie Richard Groves Jr. is mercifully straightforward. Start at that link and drive your way up the paternal chain (seven generations, don’t get tired) to his ancestor Nicholas (La Groves) Groves (1644-1703). You’ll see that he has a daughter, Hannah (Groves) Moulton (1676-1764). Click on her and you’ll see that her husband was Robert Moulton (IV) (1675-1756). Click on him and see that his father was Robert Moulton III (1644-1731).
As you will see on his Wikitree page, Robert Moulton III most definitely testified at the Salem Witch Trials. Know what’s very Spooky, though? You will find no mention of him or his testimony anywhere in the numerous and lengthy Wikipedia pages devoted to those trials. He has been stricken from the record.
The same goes for the genealogy of Linda Moulton Howe. It takes a bit of digging and I can only come oh so close to formally proving that she is descended from these Moultons. That was why the original post turned out too long and had to be broken up. I’ll have to ask you to accept the genealogical connection and Linda’s Spookiness provisionally. (But seriously, at this point what do you think the chances are she’s not related?)
In closing, a note on disinfo: I alluded that I got here by looking into the UFO phenomenon. Well, you know how Eisenhower supposedly met with aliens in 1954? You should, because we hear about it over and over and over. Personally, I now conclude it’s disinfo. In fact, I now hear disinfo agents treat it as established fact and spin their tales out from there. It’s insane.
I can see now that it’s part of the big smoke cloud to keep us from seeing things like this passage regarding Ike that I stumbled across in Groves’ wiki:
The Chief of Staff of the United States Army, General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower, met with Groves on 30 January 1948 to evaluate his performance. Eisenhower recounted a long list of complaints about Groves pertaining to his rudeness, arrogance, insensitivity, contempt for the rules, and maneuvering for promotion out of turn. Eisenhower made it clear that Groves would never become Chief of Engineers. Groves realized that in the rapidly shrinking postwar military he would not be given any assignment similar in importance to the one he had held in the Manhattan Project, as such posts would go to combat commanders returning from overseas, and he decided to leave the Army.
I’d say Ike smelled a rat and drove that rat out. In the context we now see, Ike was right, and They don’t want us to be aware of and understand these things. But anywho, there were these flying saucers, see, and then Ike….
Bonus: There was another item in the Groves wiki that I was not aware of before:
At this point, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson intervened, announcing that he would be making the targeting decision [for the atomic bombings]….
I’ll write it up fully when I cover the “Battle of Los Angeles”, but from research I did for that, I knew that Stimson was descended from the Clarks, one of whom appears at the (you got it) Salem Witch Trials! History actually tends to make more sense after a while, when you begin to see the machinery in operation.
Thanks for reading!
I wouldn't argue the point, but I would just suggest you may want to reconsider as to whether nuclear weapons would be used. From my research, they have been used, many dozens of times.
Just as one example so you don't think this comes out of nowhere: Remember all that talk about depleted uranium weapons going to Ukraine? So much discussion! And then they were finally shipped there? And then no one said anything more about the subject like it never existed?
The weapons ended up at a warehouse in Khmelnytskyi, and it was hit with an airstrike on 5/13/2023. Go back and look at the footage and you'll see titanic explosions followed a strange glowing rain coming back down out of the mushroom cloud. In my very inexpert guess, that was the vaporized depleted uranium raining back out. That's why you would use tactical nukes, and that's also why no one ever talked about them again.
But that's just my opinion and, as I always say, everyone is free to believe as they wish!
I had no idea anything like that happened. A nuclear strike in Khmelnytskyi and glowing rain coming down afterwards?
I'll see what I can find, I am pretty good at that being an anon and all.
The videos are now extraordinarily hard to find (of course), but here's an article with tweets from three angles:
Khmelnytskyi: Two NATO Tactical Nukes in Western Ukraine Storage Hit by Cheap ‘Iranian’ Drone…Radiation Alert Over Europe (The Intel Drop 5/13/2023)
It's quite spooky when you have some idea of what you're really seeing up close. If you watch at the third video, compare the size of the blasts to the much closer apartment buildings in the foreground. The explosions are absolutely titanic.
The linked article does not discuss the matter, but the headline suggests the alternative narrative that the bunkers were hit with conventional missiles and that the Ukrainians were storing secret nukes there that were accidentally set off.
Personally, I could never figure out whether this was deliberate disinfo on someone's part to occlude what really happened, or whether a couple of analysts didn't know how hard it is to set off a nuke. You'll run into this alternative narrative elsewhere.
My admittedly amateur opinion is that the Beirut fertilizer blast was bigger.
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=beirut+explosion&mid=32BC411B99FDB790D57832BC411B99FDB790D578&FORM=VIRE
Another thing is that atomic bombs require extremely precise timing to set them off and avoid a fizzle. I really doubt that a nuclear explosion can be triggered by an external explosion.
Beirut was another nuke. It's an extraordinarily long story (that ends in a Blackhawk orbiting my house) but that device was one of the ones described in this article:
US Deploys New Low-Yield Nuclear Submarine Warhead (FAS 1/29/2020)
No, it wasn't a US sub that fired it, which is part of that very long story.
In any case, if you research the W76 mod 2, you'll find that it's 5kT nominal yield, and that matches up perfectly to the size of the fireball which is the same as the grain silos next to it, about 500' IIRC.
Also important is that is was never engineered as a warhead itself, but as the primary for a fusion weapon. That's going to give different results, such as the very apparent Wilson cloud.
Mysteriouser and mysteriouser. Anyway, good luck with your research!