TL;DR: Both men were, at different times, married to the same woman, and each was married to her at the time they were (purportedly) murdered. This coincidence is far too bizarre to believe it was mere happenstance, and as always you should be asking the question: “Why in the hell is this the first I’m hearing about this?” It takes some unraveling to make sense of it all, and that’s what we’ll do.
You may be supposing this came up because I was doing more research on how the Mormons were overthrown pretty early on, which I wrote about just days ago:
Billy the Kid was the cousin of two Mormon OGs that overthrew Joseph Smith and the LDS, which should tell you one was fake and the other controlled from way back (plus the Parkers appear!) (conspiracies.win 11/12/2024)
Nope, not at all. The world is far stranger than that. I was trying to answer the question: “Is there a connection between J. Allen Hynek and the Salem Witch Trials?” It sounds like what you’d hear around the asylum but, trust me, I have a couple of posts coming up where it will make perfect sense. Anyway, I noticed in his wiki that his thesis advisor was William Wilson Morgan.
“Aha, Morgan!” thought I. But that’s all I thought since, TBH, I had totally forgotten about that Freemason whistleblower/victim and was focusing on the name “Morgan”. If you’re thinking about J.P., yes, that’s them, but it goes so much deeper. I will tell you a little about the Morgans and America’s first “alien invasion” as a bonus, so stick around. My point is that when I was trying to look up WWM’s genealogy (which doesn’t exist, quite sus), I finally stumbled into our subject, William Morgan (anti-Mason). (<- look how They promote that aspect)
Every good conspiracy theorist remembers that name (except for me, clearly), and his narrative goes something like, “High-level Freemason becomes disenchanted with their nefarious activities and decides to out them by writing a book. Before it can be published, they kidnap and murder him as a warning for anyone thinking of exposing their secrets. A huge backlash entails, even resulting in the formation of America’s third political party, the Anti-Masonic Party.” Conspiracy Lore 101, right? For the love of Christ, even the mainstream pushes it on us:
One Man Exposed the Secrets of the Freemasons. His Disappearance Led to Their Downfall: Before his book could be published, William Morgan was dragged away by a group of Masons, never to be seen again. (History.com 12/19/2018)
Did you notice they contradict themselves between the title and the subtitle? If no book was published, then he exposed nothing, correct? Jeez, people just don’t read. But anyway….
Nope, I no longer believe it. Well, I don’t believe the “problem” part, but I do believe the “reaction, solution” part. To understand this, though, I feel I have to get you to see it from my angle, and that will take nothing less than shattering the Universal Paradigm of the Conspiracy Theorist. That may take a couple of paragraphs.
You see, the CT paradigm is, “The (blanks) are running the show.” From there, you’re free to choose anything you prefer: Jews, Masons, Jesuits, Black Nobility, Regular Nobility, Jews, Democrats, oligarchs, Phoenicians, Reptoids, Jews, bankers, etc. Choose as you wish and feel free to change any time. All are incorrect because the paradigm itself is incorrect, which is why the vast majority of conspiracy theory is ultimately harmless. It’s more subtle than that, and you can’t reason and research your way from one to the other. That’s what makes paradigms paradigmatic.
Think of the Great Pyramid, where each of the blocks is a center of power like those listed above. The whole structure is blocks arranged in a certain way but there is no cement between them. Each, theoretically, would be free to slide around anywhere it wanted but gravity and friction keep them all firmly in place, even over millennia. Similarly, the real Power at the Top keeps the blocks of power in place through seduction, infiltration and subversion. In our current case, it looks like the Freemason block was sliding out of place and needed to be shoved back in. I hope that makes sense.
Project BILLMORGAN now looks like a psyop to knock down the advances that Freemasonry might accomplish until “They” could gain or regain control. Indeed, the famous in certain circles letter written by George Washington in 1798 regarding the subject now makes perfect sense in this context:
It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Iluminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more fully satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or the pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may have done it, and that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects—and actually had a seperation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.
If at this point anyone wants to say GW was a dipshit or a double-agent or both, go ahead, because everybody knows “the (blanks) are running the show.” As for me, I see that he was hip to doctrines and principles being advanced by Bad Actors on the loose, but just not generated and organized through Masonry at that time. If Freemasons had been “making good men better” in the US—and would be doing so for the next two and a half decades—that would be a real problem for generational Satanists and Their Infernal Majesty, would it not?
Finally, to the analysis. Please refer back to that little narrative summary I wrote. I would include quotes right from Morgan’s wiki, but I feel we’re already running long. This is what you’ll find with a not even careful read: He was not a high-level Mason and maybe not a Mason at all. No such book or excerpt thereof exposing Masonry ever surfaced. No one reported seeing him killed or dead. No one ever went to jail or even to court. His body was never found—well, except long after the fact, a body was discovered that just might possibly have been his. But it was found in a grave with grave goods, which never happens unless you have some very thoughtful murderers.
Then there’s the flip-side of this analysis also. Masons take that crazy oath about “if you reveal our secrets, we’re going to cut your throat from ear to ear, pee on your stupid dead face, bury you at high tide, etc.” If this was them carrying that out because they’re zealots in a nutty secret society, why did they skip all that? Demonstrating their commitment should have been primary. I’m sure the porch Masons still got the message, though, and in any case main thrust was to blackwash Masonry to general society.
William’s genealogy has been mostly vaporized, which is SOP for a spook. My only note is that while the Morgans had previously been operating out of MA, William was “murdered” in Youngstown, NY in 1826 and Junius Spencer (JP’s dad) first went to Wall Street in 1833, so it looks like the Morgans were on the move.
To close, if none of this convinced you it was an op, then temporarily take my word that the narrative and circumstances surrounding Morgan’s wife, Lucinda (Pendleton) Harris (1801 - 1856) get far less believable. The fact that she later married Joseph Smith is just the tip, so to speak. It will all have to wait for a full post, if that’s any indication how much we’ll have to laugh at.
Bonus: I said that I had recently found out that the Morgans were very spooky, all the way back to the beginning, and that that’s what had originally drawn my attention. To set up the punchline, you have to understand that a guy named Miles Morgan (1616-1699) was the progenitor of the whole Morgan family. You’ll see good old J.P. on that page.
History also records a very early heavy-hitter was operating in Massachusetts called Captain Samuel Appleton (1625-1696). Morgan’s page admits that they must have known each other from an incident in 1675:
… Morgan's blockhouse became a fortress of the place, and, after the burning of the settlement, held out until messengers had been despatched to Hadley. Captain Samuel Appleton, with a force of men (the standing army of the Massachusetts Bay Colony), marched to Springfield and raised the siege.
I claim it went way deeper. In Morgan’s Wikitree page, we can find a reference to this book:
Morgan, Appleton. A History of the Family of Morgan, from the Year 1089 to Present Times. (New York, 1902)
An authoritative history of the Morgans written two centuries later by a Morgan named Appleton. The families appear to have stayed close. Anyway, a few miles away and at exactly the same time as the fake Salem Witch Trials, Captain Samuel Appleton is involved in (I would say hoaxing) an alien invasion, but it was in the style of the 17th Century! It’s sometimes referred to as the “Gloucester Invasion”. It’s very hard to find info on it, but you can read up on it here:
The Spectre Leaguers, July 1692 (Historic Ipswich 3/19/2021)
It’s hilarious! It will remind you very, very strongly of the story of the “Hopkinsville Goblins” and:
How the ‘Little Green Men’ Phenomenon Began on a Kentucky Farm (History.com 1/2/2020)
Did you see the credit for those little drawings? “J. ALLEN HYNEK CENTER FOR UFO STUDIES”. My God, frens, this material writes itself.
Double-bonus: That 1955 incident is more formally known as the Kelly–Hopkinsville encounter. Well it turns out that in the 1640’s, back before the Salem Witch Trials, they were running the same fake hunts for the same fake witches in Essex, England, the wellspring of these Spook Families. Guess who was leading the charge? The Witchfinder General Matthew Hopkins!
Coincidences? I feel they will never end.
The thing is, when you boil it all down, the only "evidence" of the whole affair is that William Morgan didn't seem to be around town any more. That's it. All of it was based on few people telling tales, which is a pretty low bar for executing a psyop.
As pointed out in the post, the reaction of the Masons at the time was basically irrelevant. I have yet to come across any reaction recorded in history from Masons of the time. If nothing else, you think they'd like to clear their name, right?
That's par for the course, though, given that they weren't the targets of the psyop. For example, If you imagine all the emergency services personnel that were at the Sandy Hoax event and might have something to say about exactly what they saw or did not see that day, 0% of them speak up. Just... not their business, you know?
Ya, it's history that can not be pieced together, ever