This ethnic cleansing plan has been flatly turned down by both Egypt and Jordan. They know what's up and are not going along with it.
What we'll be told, of course, is that they're racists for not taking in the poor, oppressed brown people. (Yes, I know, it doesn't need to make sense.)
What to mark is how many American politicians are enthusiastically supporting this. Many are simply the typical do-gooder retards paving the road to Hell, but some are surely in the know.
Of particular interest will be what Trump has to say. I suspect he'll basically talk around it and just push directly for peace. Thus he will again and still be accused of being the wOrSt RaCiSt oF aLl tImE!
There's a related topic never discussed, which I would say is simpler and even more fundamental that the one involving exosomes. That question is: "Are viruses alive?"
If they are not some type living creature, that puts a stake through the heart of pretty much everything conventional science has to say about viruses, and particularly about vaccines. That's why it's never discussed. It's the old, "Spot me one miracle and I can prove the rest."
Anyone interested can investigate the issue for themselves, but I suspect you'll find it like walking into a fog bank. It looked solid from the outside so you always assumed it was, but when you get in there you find it extremely tenuous and there's nothing at all to grab on to.
You can notice a certain phenomenon much more frequently these days:
We all subconsciously assume that someone speaking or writing is attempting to communicate with the intended audience. But what we we see here and in many other places is not that at all. It's an attempt to manipulate a different audience. It's not at all communication as we suppose it to be.
Can someone who has abandoned communication of the normal human fashion be reasoned or bargained with? It does not seem likely. They have implicitly declared that you are not worth talking to, and will only talk at you if they believe they may benefit from that.
I suggest everyone take the time to look at the second-order effect here. That is, look around and notice how many people don't recognize this "person" as the blood-soaked decomposing fabulist he is.
Are they unable to notice? Are they too pussy to speak it aloud? Are they scared, deer-in-the-headlights, don't know what to do and just want it all to go away? IDK, but we live with them and it's worth noticing how many there are.
The only thing interesting about this utterly uninteresting "Maine event" (haha) is the inclusion of "high-powered hearing aids". That leads all the smart kids to immediately conclude "voice-to-skull" tech was used for mind-control.
What I've noticed with all of these psyops over the last few years is that they have to bait them with a piece of "conspiracy candy", like how the Nashville shooter was a tranny, or the Waukesha Chrismas parade runner-over was actually black.
The smart kids fake themselves out, thinking, "Oh, if it was fake, they would have had a white Christian het MAGAist, but since they didn't I know it was real." The Flat Earth psyop has functioned in a related fashion.
What should be observed is how well that angle performs on some. That should, in turn, give us insight into how the human mind actually works, which is what we should always keep foremost.
The crucial effect of "Christian Zionism" simply cannot be underestimated, yet it is nearly invisible in mainstream and even alternative discourse. I personally had never heard of it until a few years ago. It's actually a worse misunderstanding than knowing there were Jews but never noticing there was such a thing as "Zionism" because there are an order of magnitude more Christian Zionists.
It is part of the plan--the one behind and above Zionism and other initiatives--that the Christian branch of it go unnoticed and undiscussed. You can trace it all the way back through the heretical Scofield Reference Bible in 1909. It was published by Oxford University Press, which is "Their" conduit for what were are handed down as "Western civilization".
The craziest, most perverse part you'll find in this cesspool is the "accelerationism" aspect. That is, supporting Israel more quickly brings on the final confrontation in which Israel is destroyed, opening the door for the return of Jesus. So the weird thing is, they want Israel destroyed too.
I would close with, "You just can't make this stuff up!" except that they did. It's unhinged, blasphemeous bullshit.
I think the most damaging thought They are desperate to keep out of the minds of anti-government Israelis is, "Hey, wait a sec. The Palestinians hate the government and we hate the government, and it seems to be at the center of all the trouble. Let's go see if Hamas has any extra guns and bullets and we'll all head over to Bibi's place together."
We all know very well you never go full retard, so I suggest people interpret this for what it is: a lame and absolutely desperate attempt by the Zionists to gain support for their war. If they don't "win" this one (however they are defining that in their deranged minds), they know there's never going to be another.
You can picture Hitler in the Fuhrerbunker receiving reports that the Red Army is on the outskirts of Moscow: "Ve haff zem right vere ve vant zem. Paz along ze good newz and zend all reinforzements!"
I would presume these were the same devices as the one used in Port Said blast in August 2020. That one was carried by an air-launched missile, but these appear to have been smuggled into an underground facility, probably an ammunition depot or rocket storage or both.
These devices are ~5kT yield each with very low or no residual radiation. About 50 were stolen by Israel from the US at the very beginning of 2020. BTW, from that we can conclude that Israel has few or no other nuclear weapons, as the theft was quite risky. So the end-of-the-world "Samson Option" is off the table, but I think we can see that four dozen of these babies could do quite a lot of damage.
One might wonder why certain entities like Iran, Hezbollah, Russia, Jordan, Egypt, Turkiye, etc., don't call out Israel for this latest crime against humanity. They surely must see this for themselves. Many would conclude out of hand that if they aren't saying anything about this, then it didn't happen. I find that very shallow and naive.
I don't presume to know the thinking and planning of these entities, but the old saying is, "If you're going to kill the king, kill the king". That is, any kind of public announcement would almost certainly only work to push Israel into more maniacal and genocidal crimes before they are taken down.
Second, the Muslim world--backed up by quite a thick chunk of the non-Muslim world--is balanced on a knife edge of popular outrage. Millions upon millions of them are literally within driving distance of Israel. What happens if that boiling pot finally boils over?
Personally, as outrageous and damning as this latest act is, if I had the power to act as these governments do, I would look to handle it some way other than shouting it from the rooftops.
If you're thinking that Israel used nukes, I would agree.
My thesis would be this: they located an underground Hamas ammunition depot and decided to take it out. As we are repeatedly told, Hamas has an elaborate tunnel system and obviously such facilities would be located underground and accessible through the tunnels. They destroyed it using two tactical nukes smuggled in to the locations. (From other research, I believe that they have a stash of about <50 5kT nuclear devices.)
If you examine the first video, there's no sound of a jet and no visible or audible incoming missile or bomb. From the second explosion, there's also no flash, very little fireball, and no shockwave or loud boom. From that, we can would conclude both of these detonated underground.
You can also observe the sound of many secondary explosions. That is some of the ordnance there "cooking off". We don't see any evidence of it because, again, it's all underground. The thick black smoke is from the incompletely burned hydrocarbons of explosives or rocket propellant.
In the second video, we can observe no crater or even an epicenter. The building shown right at the beginning doesn't even have surface damage from debris. The wreckage itself is reminiscent of 911, in that we can hardly identify what had been there, as we would be able to if something had either blown apart or collapsed. Rather, most of it was reduced to dust.
Interestingly, on the very heavily damaged building on the left side of the site, on the left side of that building you can see part of it down low was also dustified while the building next door shows no surface damage, and again next to unrecognizable wreckage. What sort of bomb creates that kind of pattern in the damage? No conventional one, of course.
IDK if it's fit into this in any way, but the "London Bridge" in Lake Havasu was pre-existing and dug out of the ground, and the original was dismantled and tossed in the ocean on the way over, I guess.
I wrote it up here a year ago:
They've been at this for a long time. Anyone remember Hurricane Patricia back in 2015?
Hurricane Patricia was the most powerful tropical cyclone on record worldwide in terms of wind speed and the second-most intense on record worldwide in terms of pressure....
I looked up some pictures of the damage the day after, and the worst I could find was where some palm fronds had been blown off the top of Jose's Taco Shack on the beach. It was laughable.
Like two weeks later they invented some village that had flooded. Upon inspection it just looked like it had flooded. No wind damage.
"They" don't need to work hard to sell their lies because They know for a fact no one is looking. They write it up in Wikipedia later on and it magically becomes The Truth(tm).
I suppose the purpose of this is to shift the Overton Window. It's the same as when we found out in Syria that there were bad and good radical Islamic terrorists, in Ukraine that there were bad and good Nazis, and in the US that protests could be violent and fiery but mostly peaceful.
So let nothing in the article indicate that when Putin murders his political enemies he's other than one of the Worst Persons in the World(tm). It's just that it's a good thing when we do it, mkay?
Some may be of the opinion that Flynn is controlled opposition, sheep-dipped over the course of that big trial for collusion with Russia or whatever. If so, you will note that They will run this ring of the circus just as long as people will still walk into the tent and watch.
Weirdly, that's where the "Miles Mathis" disinfo psyop has been leading for several years. After many years as a treasure trove of exposing historical events as fake, it slowly devolved into "everything is fake".
The last one I happened to see is that the Maui fires were fake because there were some suspiciously grainy photos. I suspect the "MM" project must have been all but abandoned and the intern is running it now.
I would suggest that what it should be is "instructive", specifically as to how the human mind actually works.
And for anyone that's going with, "tHeY'rE dUm!", then the amazing part should be how we lived with these same people all our lives and never made this identification. The fact that anyone could hold such a view is instructive to me.
One would always like to just neatly put everyone into one category or the other, but with many of them it's just not so simple.
Like with Makow, when I first went to his site for a few articles, I saw all the other stuff about Satanic this and that and thought, "What a loon!" Fast-forward a number of years, and I think, "Well, he's dead on and way out in front on both the Jews and Satanists." But he believes the Holocaust was real, though, so I tend to think that maybe everybody can have a blind spot.
As to Corbett, I've only recently come to the conclusion that he's a very deep cover disinfo agent, and they waited until the start of the Ukraine War to activate him on certain subjects.
A couple of months into it, he was talking about the war and I thought, "Where is he getting his info? Strictly from the front pages of NYT and WaPo?" There's no way a careful researcher could possibly just subscribe completely to the mainstream narrative on anything. He also turns out to be a "Never Trumper", no shades of gray at all.
I finally figured out what his disinfo angle was, and I'm sort of ashamed it took me so long. He's sort of a stenographer, just collating, arranging, and presenting material you could find yourself on r/conspiracy easily enough. No secrets are actually revealed, no insights. He's a "conspiracy theorist" without theories.
It finally clicked near the end of his last show, "The Great Travel Reset". He spends 35 minutes talking about material the Elites have published themselves about the subject, then ends with this very snide (in my opinion) rant about people asking him for a 2-minute summary on the topic. "If you want that, go to TikTok. I hope you can find that person, that person is not me. That's not what I do on the Corbett Report, okay?"
But hang on, wasn't that exactly his entree into all this? Isn't his best known video literally a 5-minute summary of 911, a very complex topic? Is it really believable that he lacks that much self-awareness? Not in my opinion.
This de-dollarization has been going on for a while. The first domino was knocked over by all the financial sanctions against Russia after the Ukraine invasion, but all these other countries had clearly been setting up the dominoes for a long time waiting for the right time to act.
This article is a pretty decent roundup:
By the numbers: The de-dollarization of global trade (The Intel Drop 1/14/2023)
It's already almost a year old and there has been a steady stream of news since then regarding dollar asset dumping and abandonment of the petrodollar. None of this is reported in the Western media for obvious reasons.