I hate to doubt the word of any Hebraic author, but this story is at great variance with mainstream history. Yes, here I am citing the mainstream, but you've got to throw a hell of a lot of stuff out to buy Goldstein's version. For those interested in the details, there's a discussion of the claim here:
Was Albert Pike a founder of the KKK? (r/AskHistorians 8/22/2017)
More crucial, I would argue, is the larger context of the claim itself, of which few are aware and which I will describe here. That is, the KKK was dead and buried within a decade of it's founding. And it remained buried for forty years.
Here I would interject the hypothesis that the "KKK" was reanimated as a social engineering operation, which it remains to this day. As to the founding of the "Second Klan", anyone involved in the first version would have been an old man or dead.
You'll find that this new KKK (which dropped all reference the original, surprise) was kicked off by promotion in the movie, "The Birth of a Nation". In turn, you find that movie was financed by Jewish merchants from Boston. Are we getting the picture?
So maybe it's not such a mysterious coincidence after all that this legend is being promoted by a Jewish author.
Sort of a sidelight to this obvious bullshit story, but the "tragic death" of his wife and daughter looks like his "Elite sacrifice".
Take a look at the timeline and you'll see that this dumb corrupt butthole's non-existent career took off like a rocket directly afterwards for no apparent reason whatsoever. A tale told many times, when you take a close look at Elites.
I thought for a long time that McKinnon was totally honest and that there was something to be learned from what he had found. Now, though, with the recent promotion of all things stinking of Blue Beam, I think McKinnon was fed the information he found in just the same way that Bill Cooper came to conclude he had been fed UFO disinfo.
So McKinnon comes off as forthright because he is. When he describes his exploits, he says it was easy. Now I see it was all too easy. And would They let this this nerd get thrown in the slammer even though he had compromised nothing real, let alone of any importance? Of course! Makes it all the more convincing.
Noted Sandy Hoax researcher's site jamesfetzer.org was expunged from archive.org for a while. They explicitly acknowledged it had been removed. AFAIK, they did it voluntarily, never being compelled by any authority or legal proceeding.
If you go to jamesfetzer.org now, you're redirected to poznervfetzer.com. The entire site is just a list of links to the legal proceedings in the case against Fetzer by Leonard Pozner, the supposedly bereaved father of "Noah Pozner". I would guess that--as much as "They" would desire to-- there would be a big problem trying to suppress such a list of publicly filed court documents. All of Jim's other material is gone.
The point is, when "They" want to shut you up and vanish your content, "They" can go very, very far along that path. We are indeed already in deep waters.
Well, you suggest it's obvious but the problem is how successfully it's been hidden.
Scroll up and down this forum and they're screaming about Jews. Scroll up and down r/conspiracy and there's not a single mention of Christian Zionism. Even those considered the most astute in these circles only go so far as to say Zionists are distinct from Jews.
But I find this a time a revelation, driven by desperation, where these CZers must de-cloak to save the Zionist project (and all that lies behind it) from oblivion. I think there are a lot of people now asking themselves, "Hey, why are all these 'America Firsters' suddenly so iron-clad 'Israel Firsters'? Mike Johnson never troubled himself to call out people who criticize America. Why all this?"
So yeah, it's plain, but people are sooo sloooow to work through it.
Haha, no, never saw that, but I can imagine!
But you know, whether it's the Moon landings or any of a zillion other things, what makes normies normies is not what they think, but how they think. That is, because they can't conceptualize that those they consider "authorities" could be lying, the evidence means nothing.
Like if you asked a normie, "Hey, do you think it's possible the Moon landings were faked?", unless the first thing out of their mouth is, "Yeah, it's possible, but...," then it simply doesn't matter how fake and how gay it all is.
The real state of the world--when you examine it closely--is way crazier than any lame-ass "space mission"... lol
The full story of the Playtex Moon suits will make you LOL.
In short, they worked on them for almost 3 years and failed. NASA canceled the contract and put it back out to bid with Playtex not invited. Playtex submitted anyway, two weeks late, and passed only 12 of the 22 tests. Of course Playtex won. They went to work with a skeleton crew of 12, and a couple of months later... voila! Working Moon suit! Good old American... ingenuity? No, I think "lying" was the word I was looking for.
How Playtex Helped Win the Space Race (Mental Floss 7/18/2016)
What's interesting is that you can see this was written up in a mainstream outlet fairly recently for everyone to see. My point here is that you can lay it out and people still don't "see" it for themselves, and that phenomenon is actually more important than phony Moon suits.
I would contend that Mark does not hit this nail right on the head. Rather, there is a deeper, more foundational force at work that surfaces at a higher level as the split between neocons and paleoconservatives. That force is Christian Zionism, and the force of it is so subtle (by design) that even many Christian Zionists don't know they're Christian Zionists.
You can go from media outlets like Western Journal and Gateway Pundit to rock and roll bad boy Kid Rock and find that as awake and aware as they are on every other issue of politics and social engineering, they have no question whatsoever that Israel is the victim and must be protected at all costs. The closer you look at this, the more shocking and anomalous it appears.
We can examine a bit closer the case of podcaster Adam Curry of the No Agenda Show. He's always been a laid back, dope smoking DJ with a bent towards conspiracy, lacking strong political views aside from the vast majority of it being a big charade.
Within the last year, he converted to Christianity. He didn't even have a lot to say about that, except for a little spillover from the excitement and optimism such a conversion typically brings.
But the take on the podcast of the entire Gaza War has been complete shit. He'll make some point like, "How do we even know 30k people have been killed? What is the so-called Gaza Health Ministry anyway? I've never heard of it before." It's totally bananas.
The show has gotten a metric shit ton of negative feedback on this, as one might imagine, but it has not deterred them in the slightest. In fact, they blame the marked fall in donations on "obvious Jew-haters". To listen to the evolution of all this over the course of the months has been shocking and dismaying.
Finally, Adam made a comment during the last show that crystallized the point I'm laboriously trying to make. He said, "One of these critics said I must be a Christian Zionist, whatever that is."
Well fucking-A, Adam, didn't you try looking it up? Maybe you are one, dipshit. Maybe you'd be a proud one or maybe you'd be shocked and revolted to find out you'd become one, but you don't even fucking know one way or the other, do you?
It seems clear to me that Adam had absorbed a good amount of this CZ heresy through his church or fellow churchgoers, and he had absolutely no idea what was happening. Further, we see that when you know for a fact you're "one of the good guys", you cease to consider it necessary to challenge whether you are, in fact, doing the right thing.
I would suggest that for most or all of the Republicans supporting Israel, being in the pocket of the Joos is irrelevant at this time. They actually believe this Christian Zionist bullshit to their very core.
In the movie, Mel refers to Oliver Stone as "Their spokesperson", and to this day I've never been able to figure out if that was an admission. "JFK" was totally wrong and misleading, of course, but it maybe that's exactly why it was allowed to be made.
Then there was "Ukraine on Fire". I haven't watched it but from what I gather it was not anything the Globalist American Empire would want people talking about.
I think some of us already know what planet (or brown dwarf system) is out there, but from a conspiracy theoretical point of view, what's interesting is just how long "They" have been able to suppress it, even when evidence keeps bubbling up in mainstream astronomical circles.
For example, here's a mainstream news article from over 40 years ago about pretty much the same thing:
IDEAS AND TRENDS; CLUES GET WARM IN THE SEARCH FOR PLANET X (The New York Times 1/30/1983)
When "They" want to keep a lid on something--and moreover to do it in such a way that no one ever takes note of the lid--it's pretty shocking how well They can accomplish that.
A surprise that's no surprise at all, eh? It plugs into the thesis that the Nuremberg trials were staged, and just another part of the psychodrama.
What may also surprise some people is that, for all we are told about the infinite crimes and outrages of the Nazis, only a handful met with punishment:
Twelve of the defendants were sentenced to death (Göring, Ribbentrop, Keitel, Kaltenbrunner, Rosenberg, Frank, Frick, Streicher, Sauckel, Jodl, Seyss-Inquart, and Bormann). On 16 October, ten were hanged, with Göring killing himself the day before. Seven defendants (Hess, Funk, Raeder, Dönitz, Schirach, Speer, and Neurath) were sent to Spandau Prison to serve their sentences. All three acquittals (Papen, Schacht, and Fritzsche) were based on a deadlock between the judges; these acquittals surprised observers.
So for prosecuting the personification of evil, they went 17 and 3. They couldn't even get those last three convictions in a show trial!
If you scrutinize the list more closely, you can see the attempts at manipulating the guilty verdicts upwards. For example, Hess had left Germany in May 1941 on what many believe was a peace mission. They tell us Goring killed himself, but based on other research this was just the cover for his extraction. Donitz was just a stooge left holding the bag.
The most important was probably Martin Bormann, the "eminence grise" of the Nazi Party. He was never executed because he had disappeared before the end of the war. I suspect he was part of the "secret team" used to get Germany involved in the war in the first place. As such, he was far too important to allow him near to potentially unfriendly hands.
EDIT: I just came across this quote from one of the defendants at the trial, Alfred Jodl, again indicating how managed it all was from the very beginning:
If we did not collapse already in the year 1939 that was due only to the fact that during the Polish campaign, the approximately 110 French and British divisions in the West were held completely inactive against the 23 German divisions.
Sorry, Jodl, if that's the kinda talk you're spouting, then you gotta go!
There's a sticky on this Reddit post describing the full story of how the account is supposedly parody:
I would hasten to say I'm fairly certain that's just the alibi.
It's the far more subtle cultural engineering that's the problem, and nearly universal these days. Ask anyone you know who they admire, whose principles they follow, and whose life they wish to emulate, and there is a virtual certainty they will name a rich person.
Tell them they can't say Jesus, either, but I suspect most won't even think of him.
I would suggest that the textbook standard for this period is:
Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany by Thomas Goodrich (2010)
Additionally, there is a companion documentary from 2015 by Kyle Hunt by based on the book.
Warning: I have never personally read or watched either one, and I'll tell you why. I read one interview with Goodrich and listened to another interview with both Goodrich and Hunt. The interviews were shocking enough, and it wasn't just me. Hunt revealed there are certain parts of his own film he will not watch during screenings, and Goodrich revealed he no longer believes in God.
I would finally note that if Candace Owens is some type of controlled opposition, then it is an incredibly desperate move to even breathe that this horrifying catastrophe took place.
That's just the thing: I believe firmly that there's a science to all of it, one that I suspect would allow humanity to escape from it completely. For example, the relatively simple developments of germ theory, disinfectants, and antibiotics have averted incalculable suffering and death.
What we see, though, is that different groups of people pursue different paths according to their preconceptions and preferences. Psychiatrists prescribe anti-psychotics, exorcists pray and sprinkle holy water, and the zealots get in people's faces about how they need to repent. I'm not saying all these are totally useless, but I can guarantee none of them will lead to a solution. Already given much time, they certainly have not.
Conspiracy theorists like to lament the death of science then point their fingers and "reee!" at Dr. Fauci, which I'm sure that makes them feel superior. But what I describe here, the utter lack of even the concept of approaching demonic possession as a scientific investigation, is where I really see the failure of humanity to understand the very soul of science.
To continue along the same line, we see that we've been deliberately shoved into the blind alley of the Rockfeller medicine materialist paradigm.
I have to say I find it a bit of a depressing thought to imagine that we'll have to see the demolition of most of what we know as conventional "health care" before we'll see any real progress towards wellness, but there just no pathway from one paradigm to the other.
But then again, I'm an optimist. Look how fast the petrodollar has imploded, and it was not as catastrophic as everyone always feared.
Adding to the oddity is that the most typical manifestation is hearing voices. If the voices were "internally manufactured", if you will, then blind people's brains should be able to manufacture them without trouble. Deaf people, on the other hand, might not even know what voices sound like and would have to manufacture visual hallucinations.
I'm personally a strong believer in the work of Jerry Marzinski, who forwards the thesis that schizophrenia is actually demonic possession. Those voices they hear really are the voices of independent entities.
I think we should also keep in mind that, IMHO, the psychiatrists that study schizophrenia are the sloppiest, least disciplined group of intellectuals since philosophers and gender studies majors. You have to keep a machete handy to trim away their disorganized thinking.
I think this actually clears up a story he's been fucking up for years now. It wasn't "Boosie" it was Beau, it wasn't New Guinea it was Iraq, and it wasn't cannibals it was Reptilians.
What, you think you don't have to make a sacrifice for your body double to be President? C'mon, man!
It's not a direct comparison, but during the NATO bombing of Serbia, a clever commander using a 40-year-old SAM system was able to shoot down an F-117 Nighthawk:
Here’s how the Serbians were able to detect and shoot down an F-117 Stealth jet during Operation Allied Force (The Aviationist 3/12/2016)
Even if the S-125, which had entered in service in 1961, wasn’t considered an effective threat by the American aircraft flying over Serbia, Colonel Dani Zoltan, who commanded the SAM battery of the 3rd Battalion, was able to turn this ancient surface to air missile into a lethal weapon. In fact in addition to the F-117 kill, later during the air campaign, on May 2, 1999, Zoltan’s battery shot down a 31st Fighter Wing F-16C, the only other allied plane to be shot down by Serbian air defences during Allied Force.
Even though the article seems to expose a weakness of US stealth technology, I believe it's actually whitewash and disinfo. They attribute the defeat to some "clever precautionary moves" on the part of Zoltan, but a number of years ago I heard an interview with Zoltan himself and that's not what he said.
It was not a technical interview, but Zoltan said that he learned from the work of Tesla (a fellow Serb) that everything had a frequency. Since this old equipment was tunable, he calculated and then just played around until he figured out what the frequency of the F-117 was. Then he fired a SAM and that was that, no luck involved.
IIRC, the pilot eventually met Zoltan and they got along well. He admitted, "Yep, they dialed me in and got me good!"
It's very difficult to know from the outside, but here's basically how I've put together the narrative of The Kingdom:
The Saudis were crypto-Jews from the start, and in fact that was how they were selected to end up in charge. Time goes along and they're like some sort of controlled op component of Eretz Israel (as the Bible literally says, right?)
This is the way I read between the lines of a mainstream source like MBS's own wiki. The interesting sequence starts in January 2015, when Abdullah dies and Salman ascends the throne. MBS becomes Minister of Defence and they spend the next long paragraph blaming him for the Yemen War.
Here's where I fill in some blanks: Salman may have been sick of seeing his country kicked around and sucked dry for decades by these extremely annoying kikes and all their sanctimonious shabbos goyim. Who wouldn't, right? But he's also 80 and too old to start a big fight, so he looks around for a prince who--whatever his other faults--is not a complete and utter scumbag willing to sell out his country for yet another private jet and a few more white models to bang.
He lands on MBS, maybe even fully understanding his faults and what a longshot it all is. He might even just be hoping he doesn't live long enough to find out what a huge mistake he made. But a helluva long shot is infinite percent better than no shot at all. This paragraph in the wiki is absolutely telling:
Mohammed was appointed crown prince on 21 June 2017, following the King's decision to depose Muhammad bin Nayef and make his own son the heir to the throne. The change of succession had been predicted in December 2015 by an unusually blunt and public memo published by the German Federal Intelligence Service, which was subsequently rebuked by the German government.
Salman makes his move and the totally controlled BND recognizes that not everything is totally under control in SA. The sin is saying so out loud and they are punished for speaking the truth. Then MBS proceeds to go on a tear (as these things go):
In late 2015, at a meeting between his father and Barack Obama, Mohammed bin Salman broke protocol to deliver a monologue criticising US foreign policy. When he announced an anti-terrorist military alliance of Islamic countries in December 2015, some countries involved said they had not been consulted.
Criticizing the US? "Anti-terrorist"? Does he not know who the terrorists work for? Or does he, and he actually means what he says? LOL! Then he goes on to carefully explain why he was not responsible for starting the Yemen War.
Which brings up another point, in that it has dragged on to the current day. After all this time he still doesn't have the power to put a stop to it and announce that publicly. Gives you some idea what he must be up against.
Anyway, I very much appreciate the compliments! Glad you find some value!
First, on a sort of meta-level, I would say there's a relatively recent "sea change" in conspiracy theorization. This is greatly simplified, but it used to be there was an "official narrative" and then conspiracy theorists would coalesce around a more or less unified alternative narrative. So it was either "Moon landings real" or "Moon landings fake".
Obviously, the information warriors realized this and the countermove was to "flood the zone". So for any given event, there was not just the "conspiracy theory", but every conspiracy theory. I took note of this at the time of the fake Vegas mass shooting. Instantly, there were multiple shooters, FBI helicopters, machine guns, arms deals, multiple shooting sites, and on and on. Pick any or all, they're all wrong. I've never heard anyone else who recognizes this technique and thus it's stunningly effective.
The point of all that preamble is that we've never had to be so on our toes just to keep our heads above the flood of disinfo "conspiracy theories" floating around. The counter is that you've got to metaphorically find rocks to stand on and work from there. It's okay to change rocks if you find one is just a disinfo sea turtle resting on the bottom, but what They want is for you to float around on Their currents.
As to the rocks that I've found to stand on regarding events in the region, it looks to me that--as we might have surmised--Iran and Saudi Arabia were victims of "capture" by the Cabal. That doesn't mean everyone in the government gets a CIA paycheck or shekels deposited weekly into their bank accounts, but rather there exists a hidden network of subversion and influence.
Working against that, I've concluded (tentatively, until more persuasive evidence comes along) that MBS and Khamenei are reformers intent on freeing their nations. Just as one example for MBS, that's why we got that "journalist Khashoggi murdered by Mohammad Bone Saw" narrative. It was beyond absurd! They just hammered away at it because they wanted him gone. Even now it's stuck in the minds even of your average conspiracist. The Neom project looks to me like MBS knows he needs to rework SA's economy for the day (which we may live to see) when it's generally recognized that oil is abiogenic and gas will be a dollar a gallon.
Iran is more subtle, but a few years ago I wanted to decide which side Khamenei was on. Somewhere along the line, I stumbled across Ali Khamenei's fatwa against nuclear weapons. It's actually a key point that I "stumbled" across it, since I have never one single time heard it mentioned before or since, in the mainstream or among conspiracy theorists. Clearly, "They" do not want this known. They will not even call Their deadliest enemy (real or fake) a liar. My conclusion is that he's sincere and thus is a legit reformer and is indeed battling the Zionists as best he's able given very dicey circumstances.
Now, of course, the countermove to Iran finally dealing some payback long in coming to the Zionists is to--once again--flood the zone with conspiracy theories: "The attacks were entirely faked", "Israel was forewarned", "Everybody in Iran knows the government works with the CIA", "The missiles just landed in the desert", etc, etc. Mentally, you'll tie yourself in knots trying to put two of them together, let alone all. At some point, you're admit you're being lied to in a way you did not see coming.
Which brings up a crucial point: I've found that the difficult part of the technique of locking on (at least provisionally) to items of truth and making decisions from there is that you find we are all awash in deliberate liars, that many people you like and admire are such liars, and that even more people you like and admire are actually dumbshits who were taken in by it all.
It's really painful and really lonely, and, well, in truth that's precisely the reason those nice and smart and honest people were taken in by it all. You see, it's not that they were really fooled, per se, it was just that their subconscious saw the difficult path ahead and turned them back, letting them be taken by the current.
Well, this sure ended up a lot longer than I intended! lol
Before the shills get around to it and start saying, "Yeah, but those missiles probably just hit out in the middle of a dirt field!", I would add that Iranian missiles proved to be startlingly accurate in combat launches four years ago against Ayn Al Asad Air Base.
Precision in such weapons systems is measured with "circular error probable". That is, taking the aim point as the center, 50% of the projectiles will fall within a circle of this radius.
For Ayn Al Asad, I eyeballed it at the time to about 3m, but this guy took it upon himself to do an incredibly thorough analysis:
Assuming our estimation of the intended targets and measurements are realistic, an Iranian missile accuracy ranging on average between 2.5 and 19.5 m is very impressive to say the least and indicates the use of advanced terminal guidance technology (guiding a missile in its terminal phase).
With that kind of accuracy, they can pretty much hit whatever they care to aim at.
Just as a theoretical question, I've wondered if there was a single person who could say, "I was against taking the vaccine, but based on what Donald Trump said I took it and something bad happened."
Maybe there are some, but not many and I've certainly never seen it documented. If that's the case, then it's hard to pin a lot of blame on him. People sure do it anyway, though.