I think everyone who is alarmed and even disgusted at this should take a moment, step back, and realize that these people think they're the heroes of this story. If you disagree with them on any level and for any reason, you're the bad guy. They will do whatever they can to make sure that "good" triumphs.
The harder you fight them, they more heroic they perceive their struggle against persecution. They are trying to save the children, after all.
To my eyes, it seems to be getting more difficult to sustain the view that Musk is controlled op, even if he once was. No shills seem to be jumping forward to clearly explain why all this sound & fury was necessary just so Twitter can return to doing what it was already doing.
Well, maybe i JuSt DoN't GeT tHe PlAn!
I saw this picture when it happened. I never even knew the names of the mother and daughter before today, but I was never able to forget the image. I described it to many people as one of the saddest pictures I have ever seen. None seemed to care.
Back then, nobody had much idea what was going on in Ukraine. "There are actual Nazis there!" I told them. None troubled themselves to find out more. Few could have even found Ukraine on a map.
Fast forward to 2022 and now there are many strident maniacally homicidal ignorant virtue signallers on the side of the people that did it. I suspect most of them still could not find Ukraine on a map.
I agree 100%. On the plus side, you only get desperate near the end when you think you're going to lose. On the minus side, we may have to live through them going out with a bang. It's the nature of the "bang" that worries me.
You would think that this would mean that forevermore we could bring this up to any normie repeating something they'd heard in the MSM as if it were rock-solid fact and say, "Remember that time NBC said intelligence agencies plant lies in the media? How do we know this isn't another one?"
Of course, it doesn't mean that. They'll just say, "Yeah, well, this is true. What are you, some kind of conspiracy theorist?"
I can't think of a single instance where any predictions of this nature have worked out. Even for the people that "predicted" 9/11 on such a basis, well, I'd like to see that in the context of all their other predictions.
To me, the very worrisome thing is that, if you take several steps back from the day-to-day flows of news, it's quite clear "They" are getting more desperate. The obvious lies and contradictions, the naked power grabs, provocation of crises left and right, nuclear warmongering, etc.
There is no evidence that They fear any of this is going to catch up with them. Which is correct in the sense that if They prevail, it never will If They do not, then it doesn't matter anyway.
You sometimes see this near the end of Nascar races, where an agressive driver currently in second takes a dangerous risk to grab the lead and win the race, but instead causes a huge pile-up. The difference in the analogy is that, instead of getting a smaller second-place trophy, the crowd is going to swarm the track, drag him out of his car, and beat him to death with his own crash helmet.
They've already suggested it, and not in jest. They just haven't pushed the issue yet.
Jesus himself has some pretty shocking things to say about "da Joos" all through the New Testament. And of course, all on their own they come off none too attractive in the Old Testament. Talk about inciting! Good thing no one actually reads it, and if they do there's a whole giant structure to tell them what they just read.
Which is exactly why they haven't pushed the issue: so as not to draw attention to it. They don't want anyone to think, "Jesus said what? Oh, well, maybe that David Duke guy was on to something!"
Have we so quickly forgotten "ordo ab chao"? This is not mere happenstance, nor is it a side effect: it is the effect. The more we turn on each other, the easier the Elites will have it.
And as a good example, look how people turn on one another right in this very forum, where one would think the supposedly more informed and circumspect crowd would have risen some distance above the fray. I do have great hope for the future, but frankly and regrettably most of what I see here doesn't add to that.
One of the most bizarre aspects of the psychodrama were the dozens of high-profile individuals getting screamingly fake shots. Obviously they could have just arranged for saline, so why not? A fair warning to the unbegun? A ritual mocking?
I noted that Trump said he got vaxxed, but did not participate in any such event, whether real or staged or super-fake like so many other Elites.
I take this as evidence of Their desperation. The game up until now has always been allowing people to choose between two controlled opposing sides. But now They're forcing people to choose between Their (cloaked) side and one They do not control.
How many people in Pakistan are getting woke to the fact that their popular PM just got knocked off? How many otherwise "liberal, anti-Putin" Russians have realized they will get thrown in the tree chipper along with their whole country if that fits the globalist narrative? And now 1.4B Indians are about to get a close-up look at the real game.
Oddly, this story never got a lot of play:
Did Hitler shake hands with black 1936 Olympic hero Jesse Owens?
SPOILER: The answer is yes. Stumped why the media and historians ignored it. Guess they already have all the info they need.
I take this as evidence consistent that cryptocurrency is pretty much a historic, global-level intelligence project, and this dirtbag is one of their assets.
I mean, if you think of all the scams put together by all the numbnuts out there, what happens when you collect smart psychopaths together and give them billions of dollars and practical legal immunity? Like, they don't think up scams? What an oversight that would be.
The part that begins, "after the first week" refers to the depredations of the Soviet military against the German population in the immediate aftermath of the war. This time period is covered in a book by Thomas Goodrich called "Hellstorm". From the description:
Readers will witness for themselves the fate of German women as the rampaging Red Army raped and murdered its way across Europe–all females, from “eight to eighty” feared the dreaded words, “Frau Komm.”
I've never read the book and I'll tell you why: this book review was horrifying enough: Hellstorm: The Rape and Mass Murder of German Women after WWII. The review opens with this quote from Ilya Ehrenberg, Jewish propagandist in the Stalin regime:
In the German race, there is nothing but evil. Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill!
A Bolshevik of the old school. It goes way downhill from there.
A documentary film was made from the book, and I listened to an interview of Goodrich and the filmmaker. I will never watch the film; the interview was more than enough. At one point the filmmaker admitted that there are parts of the film he will not watch himself.
IIRC, about 12 million ethnic Germans are estimated to have been exterminated by various means during the immediate postwar period. Surprised you've never heard this? I sure was. But then again 12 million < 6 million, is it not?
I think at the end, Patton figured out that the US should have teamed up with Germany and conducted a "special military operation" to cleanse Russia of a certain "savage" element infesting it. No wonder he had a minor car accident.
Not that anything about this stunt is important, but for an exercise I still try to figure out what happened.
The video looked real and I'll assume it was Kiev, or I suspect someone would have said something. But two notable items: virtually no one on the streets and extremely heavy security, all in a city Russia not only never entered but moved away from a while ago.
Putting it together, I think Boris and Lil' Z flew in together. They knew the Russians would never shoot down a plane Boris was on, or any civilian plane. They clear everyone out before their quick walk because they fear Russian spies.
They are probably correct, in that the only thing they had to fear was operatives snatching Dear Leader off the streets. OTOH, I do kinda think Russia doesn't give a rat's ass about him in any scenario.
The normies turning on Elon should be examined closely as a demonstration of how easily they are controlled by mainstream narratives. To sharpen the point, there's not even a narrative here.
Musk goes from "real life Tony Stark" to "cAr MaN bIg BaD!" without actually doing anything anyone could point to as a threat or a transgression. The closest he came was basically saying, "I think freedom of speech is important."
So what's really going on? The Establishment knows he's turned on them. In fact, he did that quite some time ago but they said nothing about it because they thought they could get him back. But now they know he's irretrievable and with Twitter he can do some very serious damage.
Look up some recent mainstream headlines and it's just all negative innuendo, suggestion, and fear-mongering. That's all the Sheeple need and they turn on him right away. No reasoning, just emotion.
Wasn't it just a couple of weeks ago the BidenHarris Administration was telling everyone to go buy an electric car? Did you hear a single liberal say, "Yeah, I sure will, but never from that dickhead Musk!"? Nope, not one of them figured out Elon was a bad guy for themselves. Not one.
I mean, compare this to the Glenn Youngkin situation, who Trump also endorsed. Tons of people coming out strong saying that guy was an obvious Trojan Horse. Looks decent so far, though, but pretty much zero of them have said, "Looks decent so far, though." And even if he is, as long as he's doing more or less the right thing, well, that's progress. And Abbott and DeSantis are not to be trusted, but again, more or less doing the right thing.
And I always have to wonder if Trump knows something we all don't know.
Compelled speech makes its appearance. When this comes to the USA, they're going to point to the clear fact that the Bill of Rights does not include the right to refrain from expression required by the government. Fifth Amendment, you say? That's only for self-incrimination.
"What, are you saying you want us to find something you're guilty of?"
To see how psychological manipulation works, you have to look for what's not there but should be. Notice no one says, "Well, everyone here agrees pedophilia is not a problem, therefore...." But the entirety of the ensuing conversation, and this enabler's entire book, is based on exactly that undeclared premise.
As the discussion progresses, the overt aspect reinforces the idea that rEpUbLiCaNs ArE cRaZy!, But the more insidious covert aspect subconsciously cements the idea that the level of pedophilia is not a cause for concern, and even that pedophilia is per se not a problem.
Look at these articulate, well-dressed individuals: they speak in calm tones and show no concern. They're on TV, for crying out loud! How could pedophilia possibly be a problem? Those Republicans, there's your problem.
I highly suspect you're right. I think these stories are manufactured for no other reason than to reinforce the "Z slugging it out from a bunker in Kiev" fantasy.
Fancy room. Maybe Z stopped by No. 10 on the way to his pad in Miami. Then again, maybe they're in Miami.
I would go even one level deeper: this is an admission that control of the narrative is all they have, and if the slightest contention for it is allowed they know they will lose.