They've already suggested it, and not in jest. They just haven't pushed the issue yet.
Jesus himself has some pretty shocking things to say about "da Joos" all through the New Testament. And of course, all on their own they come off none too attractive in the Old Testament. Talk about inciting! Good thing no one actually reads it, and if they do there's a whole giant structure to tell them what they just read.
Which is exactly why they haven't pushed the issue: so as not to draw attention to it. They don't want anyone to think, "Jesus said what? Oh, well, maybe that David Duke guy was on to something!"
They've already suggested it, and not in jest. They just haven't pushed the issue yet.
Jesus himself has some pretty shocking things to say about "da Joos" all through the New Testament. And of course, all on their own they come off none too attractive in the Old Testament. Talk about inciting! Good thing no one actually reads it, and if they do there's a whole giant structure to tell them what they just read.
Which is exactly why they haven't pushed the issue: so as not to draw attention to it. They don't want anyone to think, "Jesus said what? Oh, well, maybe that David Duke guy was on to something!"