I once heard the principle that, "Dishonorable men will do dishonorable acts." (I can't find the source of the quote so maybe I just made it up somewhere along the line.)
The point is, Twitter is a bunch of servers and code and connections to the Internet, and dishonorable men did dishonorable things with it. If the policies and practices were made fair, dishonorable men would immediately try to get them changed back. If you set up your own Switter or Fwitter, dishonorable men would immediately try to infiltrate it. You can go on in this vein.
The problem is dishonorable men and their dishonorable acts. Setting up new servers and writing new code and camping in the wilderness off the grid will never permanently alter that.
Yes, absolutely, 100%. What rounds up to everything They do to us "ordinary" people is through us "ordinary" people, and if we stopped going along with them--directly or indirectly--it would all be over very quickly.
I once heard the principle that, "Dishonorable men will do dishonorable acts." (I can't find the source of the quote so maybe I just made it up somewhere along the line.)
The point is, Twitter is a bunch of servers and code and connections to the Internet, and dishonorable men did dishonorable things with it. If the policies and practices were made fair, dishonorable men would immediately try to get them changed back. If you set up your own Switter or Fwitter, dishonorable men would immediately try to infiltrate it. You can go on in this vein.
The problem is dishonorable men and their dishonorable acts. Setting up new servers and writing new code and camping in the wilderness off the grid will never permanently alter that.
The only solution is to deny the dishonorable men resources. You need to do it while you still can.
Yes, absolutely, 100%. What rounds up to everything They do to us "ordinary" people is through us "ordinary" people, and if we stopped going along with them--directly or indirectly--it would all be over very quickly.