I just browsed through reddit garbage, and it's pretty clear they're giving up. But what I noticed, that is odd, is they're trying to frame Trumpers as inciting voter fraud. (WTF???)
So what if the plan is to lean into that???
Makes a lot of sense....
They create like a false flag voter fraud event, but in Trump's favor, then blame it on him.... It's a win because he's going to win anyway, it's less work than stealing it for Kamala, they can use this to incite rioting or have him disqualified, or simply taint his term, and it also negates the 2020 story, while reinforcing the Hilary "Russian Interference" 2016 story (bonus: Neocon narrative building via false origin)..🤔
This would be the move...
I thought about this possibility, but there's just no way they can let Trump retake the presidency. He's got a much better idea what he's up against and he's going to go to work right away with a chainsaw and a sledgehammer. He's had four years to make plans and shape the battlespace.
You can see that this is understood implicitly by many, underlying certain statements they make, as if he will take power on Election Day instead of in January. That's when the Rubicon will be either be crossed or it will not, with this exception....
So Kamala is going to lose bigly even though there's going to be rigging in her favor bigly. Given all the foregoing, the only way to play that is to expose the rigging but leave out who it was in favor of. Then they just wave their hands around about having to redo the whole thing next year because "the American people deserve a fair and honest election and will settle for no less".
That will buy them time for something to break their way, like a nuclear war or some such. You can't lose as long as the game continues, can you?
I think They must look back and realize this is the gambit They should have run back in 2016. Given the controversy, a lot of people would have went along with it. It's way more obviously lopsided now than it was then. Few will be inclined towards accepting it or even putting up with anyone else that does.
EDIT: I came across this variant gambit right after posting:
Martin Armstrong: Can Biden Declare Martial Law To Suspend the Election? (10/23/2024)
Lots of detailed legal history with the conclusion: