We’ll get the boring part of “showing our work” out of the way first, plus it sets the stage for holding Deak in some suspicion and viewing his story with a certain kind of “deep conspiratorial” filter. If you like, you can trace his genealogy for yourself courtesy of the Mormons by starting here:
Rear Admiral William Sterling Parsons (1901-1953)
Just keep clicking on the father’s link. Nine generations back you’ll get this to this key guy:
Cornet Joseph Parsons (1620-1683)
Then you can do the same thing beginning with Jack Parsons and tracing back the same nine generations to the same “Cornet Joseph”:
John Whiteside Parsons (10/2/1914-7/17/1952) <- FYI: the Mormons got the date of death wrong
Note that these are direct patrilineal lines, not by marriage or adoption. Is this just an interesting coincidence? No. There are a small number of Elite families organizing—well, a lot, going back centuries—and the Parsons are one of them. The Parsons in particular were discussed in a previous post:
The occult genealogy of Jack Parsons is not at all what you think (conspiracies.win 6/22/2024)
There, you can read more about how this all connects into a huge web of Elites and psyops. These are some weaving spiders, I suppose you might say. But we’re here to focus on William Sterling Parsons, better known as “Deak”. He was heavily involved in America’s atomic weapons program, enough to gain a (another) nickname based on that:
DEAK PARSONS – THE STORY OF THE ATOMIC ADMIRAL (Center for International Maritime Security 8/28/2023)
You’ll read that Deak was a key guy in the Manhattan Project, hand-picked by Vannevar Bush, and riding next to Oppenheimer on the first train trip to Los Alamos discussing how to set up the project. He was the weaponeer on the Hiroshima mission. After the war, he became technical deputy to the commanders of the of the atomic testing programs named Operation Crossroads and Operation Sandstone. You get the idea about how deep he was. Then you can take all that and match it up with the material in this landmark paper:
The Nuclear Hoax (Miles Mathis 1/24/2016 16-page PDF)
There is plenty of other research on atomic fakery but that’s about as good as you’ll get. We’ll pause to discuss two important issues that are brought up with that paper. Both have to do with disinformation.
First, I do not at all subscribe to the theory that “all nukes are fake” or any such thing. The evidence for something is the evidence for that thing. Some nukes are real and others are not. The heart of disinfo is not selling you a particular lie, it’s divorcing you from the truth. Normies who cannot depart from the mainstream “truth” will wave their hands around and say “all nukes are real”, and disinfo agents and their dupes will wave their hands around about “all nukes are fake”. Getting to the truth demands more than that.
Second, some may object to Miles Mathis as a disinfo agent. That’s true, and I know it better than anyone, but he’s the highest-level disinfo agent anyone could name. “High-level” means he has to give up important truths to sell you important lies, or to divert you from truths even more important than he’s giving up.
In this case, you can search that “Hoax” paper for “Parsons” and you will not find Deak mentioned. Similarly, you can search his paper Jack Parsons and JPL (10/23/2019 7-page PDF) and you’ll find no mention of Deak there either. Now, one could say that I’m just a better researcher than Mathis, or that I happened to stumble on something he did not, but the situation is also consistent with the “limited hangout” function of Mathis being to hide such connections as we are now examining. Isn’t that correct?
Finally, we’ll look at something that speaks to the depth and scale on which “They” actually operate. The Army Air Forces unit that did all that (fake) atomic bombing—both in war and in testing—was the 509th Composite Group. After the war, that unit was stationed at Roswell Army Air Field.
Now, you think I’m going to say something about UFOs, but we’re not there yet and it’s even stranger than that. You see, Deak was born in Chicago in late 1901 in what you would think was a well-to-do family. One of his mother’s grandfathers had been a US Senator from Wisconsin, and the other had been Governor of Illinois.
But for no reason stated, in 1909 the family moved to Fort Sumner, New Mexico. The 1920 Census lists the population as 777, and big city Roswell only had 7,033 recorded at that time. Settlements in the area, even today, are few and far between. Why did the Parsons pack up and go out to BFE? Who knows, but look on a map and you’ll see it’s in the immediate vicinity (judging by desert southwest standards) of the White Sands Missile Range (Trinity), Roswell AAF, and Corona (supposed Roswell crash site).
Did you notice the dates, though? Parsons was first there as a child, three and a half decades before any of these places were put on the map, so to speak. Can we really convince ourselves this was all a coincidence?
I personally don’t think so and I’ll give you a little factoid as a sort of bonus, because full discussion is beyond our scope here. Remember what I said about a web being woven?
The commander of the 509th was Colonel William H. Blanchard, and he had been the backup pilot for the Hiroshima mission. He had been involved in the fake atomic testing alongside Parsons. Also, if you boil it down, if Blanchard had never given the order for the a press release, none of us would have ever heard about the “UFO crash at Roswell”.
Now get this: the area of the huge White Sands military reservation had previously been much huger, when it was a privately held collection of rich lead mines. It was known as the “Blanchard Claims”.
I try to keep my hellaciously long posts as short as possible, so just to add a bit to the nukes thing: H&N and the early testing were clearly faked. but the weapons and power plants are real. I've posted a number of times about nuclear weapons used in just the last few years in Lebanon, Palestine, Ukraine, Russia, and now Lebanon again. You can't believe the static I get.
As for the early days of nukes, it's a bit of an outstanding question. There's no direct evidence, but I would surmise that "Their" script called for nukes as the grand finale of WW2 to usher in the Cold War/M.A.D. phase of controlled history. Since they hadn't completed the engineering, they just faked it and caught up behind the scenes.
(Side note: the evidence is that nukes had been available since ancient times, so they knew it was possible and apparently planned around that, but they just didn't do their homework soon enough.)
As far as covering up an actual event at Roswell, I throw that right out. To accept that thesis, you have to believe that a UFO crashed aaaaaaaaaand all the other stuff I wrote up was pure coincidence. I reject virtually every coincidence these days.
I mean, suppose they found the "Jupiter 2" from "Lost in Space" with a bunch of dead alien Robinsons on it. The military boxes it all up and tells everyone it was a regular old weather balloon. It's way the hell out in desert, in a very rural area. Who would even notice this event, let alone have the evidence to challenge it? They tell "Mac" to STFU and that's the end of it.
It turns out that Ramey was definitely in on the fakery too. It's a bit of a long detective story to understand the precise events and circumstances that make that clear. I didn't mention it, but rather than having the shitstorm end his career running the most highly sensitive outfit in the military, Blanchard ended up a 4-star Vice Chair of the USAF. The Chairman was Hoyt S. Vandenberg, who just before the Roswell incident had left his job as CIA director. Rewards for a job well done, I'd say. I'll have to write all this up one of these days.
The oddest thing about the whole Roswell psychodrama is that they just dropped it right afterwards, and it stayed unknown for over 30 years. Seems like a lot of effort for little payback, but there you have it. It was resurrected in the 70's by Stanton Friedman (who was an asset), and now it's flogged by Kevin Randle (who is also an asset).
None of this takes away from the "UFO phenomenon". But the dynamic you have to see is that every minute interested persons spend on researching and discussing the phony Roswell incident is a minute they do not spend on researching and discussing and getting to the bottom of the "UFO phenomenon". As I mentioned, disinfo is about divorcing you from the truth.