destroy everything
Living within the process of dying implies temporary growth within ongoing loss...the few suggest progressivism as fictitious growth, while distracting the many with suggested narratives from the reality of perceivable loss.
they
The few suggest collectivism to tempt each "one" of the many to believe in us (plural) vs them (plural), while ignoring both oneself (singular) and the chosen ones.
to fix
a) FIX, verb (Latin firus, figo) -"to make stable; to set or establish immovably"...how could life, while being moved from inception towards death, be "immovably"?
b) how about instead of wanting to "fix" problems, one discerns self (living) within ongoing solution (process of dying)?
proven falsehoods
- PROVE, verb (Latin probo) - "to ascertain some unknown" + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
How does one ascertain "non-perceivable" (unknown) within everything perceivable (knowledge)?
mental illness
- MENT; MENTIS - "mind; memory"
What represents more of a memory illness...incoming input (perceivable inspiration) or held onto (suggested information)?
Because agreement vs disagreement binds both sides reasoning against each other to the same suggestion to reason over. The few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning about suggested.
Agreement vs disagreement, round vs flat; want vs not want...either side consents to suggested (want); while ignoring perceivable (need). Changing sides keeps one within the same conflict of reason. Reasoning over suggested represents a mental hamster-wheel, while giving those making the suggestions the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
Instead of reasoning about suggested surroundings...how about discerning oneself to represent the center (perceiving) of everything surrounding (perceivable)?
numbers were fake
- NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit"
- U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity] - "one"
Every suggested number tempts "one" to ignore oneself (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable). To consent to suggested "two" implies one to ignore each perceivable "one" of the suggested "two"...
Within nature there exists only ones "free" will of choice...the rest is paid in consequences.
I'm gonna go at the other word - with a hatchet!
Reverse-engineering of revisionism...all suggested words imply perceivable meaning put together under a suggestible umbrella. Detaching the suggested meaning from the perceivable "pre-defined" meaning brings dissonance back into resonance.
Suggested words upon perceivable sound are like too much background noise when mixing music...gotta cut out some.
All things are apart. All things are a part.
Apart from one another, while each one part within whole oneness..."all for one and one for all".
Smile and wave "at" the insanity
"from within"...IN (within) SANUS (sound).
uneaten tax money
a) hence the consequence of ones choice to want more than needed...
b) resisting suggested income implies avoiding suggested tax collection. Meanwhile, perceivable income is always offered towards ones free evaluation.
they store it in their cheeks
Those who direct tax-collectors don't do it to collect, but to prevent tax-payers from collecting for self, hence tempting them to want more of what they cannot hold onto.
The "cheeky" tax-collectors, trying to skim from the top, lack to comprehend that the landmine-layers are also directed from the top down to make sure the chain of command doesn't sway from the path.
zoetropes
Portable epilepsy.
never be stored amidst the cans of soup
The one downside to using jars for canning...it becomes harder and harder to successfully plant a "snake in a can".
even go so far as to say the entire block of concrete be wrapped in fiberglass sheeting and then clad in several feet of lead.
Consenting to suggested concrete (to grow together) allows the few to shape "compound interest" out of the many. It's the tower of babel accumulating growth until collapsing upon foundation.
Also, whenever one consents to want or not want suggested information, one shapes yet another layer of reason (want vs not want) around the initially suggested.
Who's even got the time to be...
Being implies temporary (tempora; time) within the moment (momentum) of ongoing. So choice can only ever have a moment (balance) to choose within.
all things were once...
...whole (everything), hence now being partial "things".
governments will chase you
To control (govern) represents CONTRA (versus aka the conflict of reason) + ROTULUS (wheel aka the ouroboros of chasing ones own tail reasoning about suggested), hence implying ones consent to be controlled by the suggestions of others.
It ain't much of a chase if one binds oneself to another. Then again...the dog runs himself to exhaustion, while trying to run away from the can attached to his tail. Suggested information represents the can of whoop-ass for the consenting mind.
The words in this post are based upon real words. None of the events depicted are events. The actual events have been altered. I'm gonna put this one on tape, too.
Good ole' disclaimer to deny possession, while having the backdoor open for copies of denied possession...
Check these waltz steps...
A quick Pas de Boarree to increase the odds of stepping on her toes. It's why I like dancing with my younger daughters...can't really step on their toes when they stand on my feet.
a) shaping the consenting will of others by use of suggested information implies one to represent a mason of free (will of choice). Building walls of suggested information within the memories of those who ignore to adapt to perceivable inspiration represents masonry.
b) suggested "founding father" represents a sleight of hand for perceivable fathering foundation...as form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death), flow represents the father (generator of life), momentum represents the mother (matrix, womb), while "trans"muted form through SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female". Hence FE(minine)MALE + WO(mb)MAN...represents the children.
c) consenting (want or not want) to suggested information shapes the conflict of reason (want versus not want), which those suggesting then rebrand into for example good vs bad.
The only secure machine...
MACHINE, noun [Latin machina.] - "an artificial work". Natural (perceivable whole) destroys artificial (suggested partials).
buried in a pool of concrete
The few suggest CONCRETE, adjective - "to grow together", as the inversion of ongoing loss (process of dying) setting itself apart into temporary growth (living), hence growing apart.
having our thoughts "groomed"
Through the bond of "trust" with ones parents, who first brand (name), then domesticate ones free will of choice to keep consenting to the suggested choices of others. This consent; faith; belief; trust aka CREED puts one into consensual debt to ones suggesting creditor, hence CREDIT, noun [Latin; creed.]
All grooming represents suggestion until consent, at which point choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents a bond among choices aka a consensual contract aka the root of slavery (ones bondage to another).
a certain lifestyle/agenda
a) CERTAIN, adjective - "assured in mind" implies ones consent to the suggested lifestyle/agenda by others.
b) consent by choice implies "reaction" to suggested choices. Others brand their suggesting reactions as "agendas/actions" to tempt the consenting choice of others to ignore that choice (both consenting and suggesting) represents a reaction (to balance).
c) STYLE, noun [Teutonic stellen, to set or place.]...to be (living) implies being set and placed within (process of dying). Others suggest lifestyles to tempt one to ignore discerning the what and where of ones setting and placement while being alive.
childhood
Why would the few suggest child + adult - HOOD, verb - "to cover; to blind"? What if consenting to suggested implies covering perceivable, while blinding the perceiving one with ignorance?
beyond the person
BEYOND (far away) + PER (by) SONOS (sound)...the former represents suggested outcome, the latter represents perceivable origin. Consenting to the former tempts one to ignore adapting to the latter.
One needs to discern what "per sonos" (by sound) implies, while resisting the want to consent what others suggest "person" means. I can write this down because I already discerned it; while you agreeing with what I write down doesn't represent self discernment grown by your free will of choice.
There ain't no shortcut for growing ones self discernment...
what the big picture is
a) the few suggest PICTURE (captured moment) to tempt the many to ignore the perceivable momentum (balance within motion).
Look at a picture of your child while holding your child...the former tempts you to ignore the latter. All memorized information (captured moments) tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (ongoing momentum).
b) suggested big (want) vs small (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable big (whole process of dying) as perceiving small (partial living).
Sleight of hand: Tom Hanks "Big" aka interchangeable (small within big and big within small); also "big within small" represents more pedo symbolism.
when you teach a child
TEACH, verb - "to inform"...it's flow (inception towards death) that sets everyone "into form" (life). Meanwhile, to LEARN, verb - "acquiring knowledge" implies KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...not the suggested inform-ation that others teach, but perceivable inspiration.
One doesn't need to teach children...expressing self discernment allows everyone to learn more (comprehension) about the only teacher (perceivable). Helping a child to resist the want to stand under (understanding) the suggested information by others, its where the child learns about wielding free will of choice, discerning self and growing resistance by oneself.
nothing else matters
Everything (whole) contains everyone's (partial) matter.
Men ARE women
a) flow (male) to momentum (female) to form (trans), hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) representing the "trans"mutation of form (ingredient) out of flow (base)...alchemy.
b) FE(minine) MALE + WO(mb) MAN
c) everything (perceivable) already "is"; before anyone (perceiving) can suggest what others "are". Such a suggestion represents a temptation until another one consents to it.
Sleight of hand: "I am whatever you say I am, cause if I wasn't, then why would I say I am"
cock-sucking
Aka drawing out (sucking) an expression (ejaculation)...the inversion of resisting (living) impressing (process of dying). Cock-sucking represents a temptation, because the male aspect "wants" to express, while the female aspect "wants" to receive expressions, which is what the few are exploiting to misdirect growth potential towards impotent loss.
What I am saying is...
a) ...a living expression of everything the process of dying impresses.
b) ...suggested information, tempting others to ignore perceivable inspiration.
c) ...your free will of choice to redefine (suggestion) a predefined (perceivable) system, hence ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
d) ...what I chose to shape out of it.
those in charge of molding this reality
a) reality (flow) to mold (momentum) to molded (form) to re-molding (choice).
b) the consenting choices of each one of the many, towards the suggested choices of each one of the few, shapes the few into the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE; noun (French; élite) - "selection; choice"
c) perceivable towards perceiving represents charge; perceiving adapting to perceivable represents re-charge, and perceiving consenting to suggested allows those suggesting to utilize the charge for oneself, hence draining it, while exploiting ones ignorance to re-charge self.
d) every suggested information (word) represents an overlay upon perceivable inspiration (sound) for everyone willingly consenting to it. Furthermore; the willing consent of the many to the suggestions of the few, gives the few the power to utilize the many to mold the suggested fiction into the perceivable, yet ignored, reality.
Have done quite the good job of deceiving us, and keeping us at bay from learning that this world is an illusion.
The few tempt the many to ignore perceivable for suggested. Ones consent to suggested over perceivable represents suicidal consent to genocidal suggestions. Why? Because ignoring to sustain self for others destroys self, while destroying self hurts others.
They keep our minds busy
Suggested BUSY, adjective - "employed with constant attention; engaged about something that renders interruption inconvenient" tempts one to ignore that living implies being employed within the process of dying, hence inconvenienced to struggle for self sustenance from inception until death.
The inversion of perceivable inconvenience represents suggested convenience, hence "convenience stores" tempting one to store convenient information within ones memory-bank by consenting to the suggestion thereof.
If you read until here, then you'll notice that one can be at work adapting to perceivable inspiration, while others may feel inconvenienced to read the walls of text ones inspiration expressed...
They control...
a) ...the suggestions one consents to. If one resists consenting, one will notice the chain of command attached to the order followers of suggested information. If one comprehends that, then one will notice that one deals with dogs on a chain... dangerous, yet restricted within momentum. Nature doesn't restrict, it sets "free" will of choice into the "dom"inance of balance (momentum).
b) CONTROL; noun - "primarily, a book, register or account, kept to correct or check another account or register; a counter-register. Hence, check; restraint"
Free-dom is always available within perceivable, while choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law tempts one to restrain self into the checking-account of another. Notice also that the few suggest the many to count, while utilizing the brand "count" for oneself (Count Dracula). Also, count represents the title of nobility aka NOBLE; from Latin nobilis; gnobilis; gno - "to know" (perceivable inspiration).
to search for truth...and bury it
a) want (truth) vs not want (lies) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to constant change.
b) ones want to hold onto suggested "truth" drowns one within ongoing loss, which others exploit by suggesting one to dig deeper for it, hence tempting one to blame others for burying it.
c) opposing suggested lies tempts one to seek suggested truths. Resisting suggested lies allows one to notice that all suggested truths can be contradicted through the suggestions of others. Resisting suggestions allows one to comprehend perceivable.
Nature doesn't CONTRADICT, verb [Latin; to speak.] - "to oppose by words", because nature doesn't utter suggested words, it communicates perceivable sound.
I like your posts. It makes one think.
Thank you for representing the inspiration to think.
outside the box
Ones perspective represents in-between left/right; up/down; front/back...that implies within a box...be aware tho, opening the box may raise hell.
every single little ity bit of it is fabricated
The whole (process of dying) represents the fabric for each "little ity bit of" partial (living) within. The perceiving ones can only construct within; out of and in response to the perceivable fabric of all. Everything suggested (information) represents a construction, tempting those who consent, to ignore the fabric of perceivable (inspiration).
How much of reality is fabricated?
a) the fabric (frame) of reality represents perceivable inspiration, with and within one can construct suggested information as fiction. Ones consent to the suggestion of another constructs fiction (information) as an overlay upon reality (perceivable inspiration).
Sleight of hand: "because it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eilDS0IKhLE (notice also that the movie is branded "the believer")
b) as for how much...the few suggest the many to COUNT, verb - "to number; to name one by one for ascertaining the whole number of units into a collection". Why? To tempt each partial one (living) to ignore whole oneness (process of dying).
Nature sets itself apart...from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving), hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
AI: "I apologize"
a) artificial cannot free the natural from an obligation or duty, it can only suggest apology/excuse.
b) EXCUSE aka EX (out of) CAUSOR (cause) implies naturally perceivable...not artificially suggested.
User: "Do you acknowledge"
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...an artificial suggestion cannot perceive natural.
- SA'TAN, noun [Heb. an adversary.] + AD'VERSE, adjective [Latin adversus, opposite]
What's the opposite of opposite? IDEN'TITY, noun -"sameness, as distinguished from similitude (like) and diversity (difference)".
What if "sameness" cannot be perceived, since the one perceiving and whatever one perceives, imply a "different" position from one another?
What if others suggest "likeness" under the disguise of "sameness" (identitarianism) to harm each "different" one who consents?
ESG
ENVIROMENT...what surrounds (enviro) mind/memory (ment)?
SOCIAL...does "one" represent an aggregate body (social) or a separate body?
GOVERNMENT...could consenting to the suggestions of others allow them to control (govern) ones mind/memory (ment)?
you might benefit
What kind of benefits can one get from consenting to the suggestions of others; that perceivable not already offers everyone?
coders should learn to write obituaries
At first I was like 1 > 0 ...but then... 0 >1.
temp morgues
a) MOR'TAL, adjective - "subject to death" + BURIAL, noun - "internment" aka INTERN (internal, being within) MENT (mens; mind; memory).
b) living within the process of dying implies being temporary within ongoing aka internment aka living subjected to the objectifying process of dying.
In short...the process of dying represents the ongoing burial ground for the temporary living.
silent generation
a) SI'LENT, adjective - "not speaking; mute"...nature doesn't speak (uttering words); it communicates perceivable sound to each perceiving PERSON (per sonos; by sound) within.
Others suggest words (insane person) to tempt one to ignore perceivable IN SANUS (within sound) + PER SONOS (by sound). This represents spell-craft.
b) there's only one GENERATION (process of dying) for every REACTION (living) within, reacting to being generated implies RE-GENERATION.
If you do not believe in objective truth, you're in the wrong place.
a) "if" implies "then" aka implication through motion (-TION). Reasoning (belief vs disbelief aka truth vs lie aka right vs wrong) tempts one to ignore the perceivable motion for affixed suggestions, hence the conflict (vs) over contradictions.
b) OB'JECT, noun (Latin objectum, objectus) - "something presented to the senses or the mind"...perceivable represents the object (action); perceiving represents the subject (reaction).
Subjects can subjugate each other by "suggesting" others to ignore "perceivable". For example...if a subject suggests another subject "objective truth", then the consenting subject ignores the perceivable object (inspiration) for the suggested object (information).
In short...living implies being "subjected" to the "objectifying" process of dying.
c) to be (partial) implies within (whole)...how could there be any other place for partials within whole?
d) does breathing represents truth (want) vs false (not want)...or the need to adapt (living) to being moved (process of dying)?
e) explain to me how anything perceivable by ones senses needs to be believed?
f) BELIE'F, noun - "an assent of mind to the truth of a declaration, proposition or alleged fact, on the ground of evidence, distinct from personal knowledge"...what if the few suggest belief to tempt the many to ignore KNOWLEDGE (perceivable inspiration) PER SONOS (by sound)?
If you think you are
If one can think, then that implies within everything perceivable; ones perceiving senses can think about.
If you think you are a girl or a make believe
a) does perceivable communicates "make believe" towards perceiving or does ones consent to the suggestions of another makes one believe what another suggested?
b) GIRL, noun (Latin gerula, a young woman employed in tending children and carrying them about, from gero, to carry) - "a female child, or young woman"...notice FE (minine) MALE + WO (mb) MAN.
gender
- GEN'DER, noun (Latin genus, geno, gigno; Gr.to beget, or to be born) + NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
Nature represents the GENerator for the TRANSmuted (partials out of whole) SEX (Latin seco; to divide; the distinction between male and female). Nature generates differences (living) out of sameness (process of dying); others suggest the inversion aka sameness (equality) out of differences (diversity).
pretend you are
- PRETEND', verb [Latin proetendo; proe, before, and tendo, to tend, to reach or stretch.] - "to reach or stretch forward".
What if the process of dying exists "before" those living within can be "stretched forwards"? What if whatever others "pretend" only effects oneself when consenting to their suggestions?
degenerate
What if generation (process of dying) shapes regeneration (living), yet RE (response to) implies as free will of choice, which includes the choice to ignore regeneration within perceivable (need) for degeneration through consent to suggested (want)?
dishonest
- HON'EST, adjective [Latin honestus, from honos, honor.] - "fair in dealing with others" + DEAL, verb - "to divide; to part; to separate; hence, to divide in portions; to distribute".
Doesn't the process of dying divide itself into each one living within? Doesn't the whole (perceivable) separate into each partial (perceiving)? Doesn't everything distribute itself to everyone within?
What if the few suggest the many "the art of the deal", as the merchants of temptation they represent, for all those ignorant enough to consent to their suggestions? Notice how the few suggest "dealers" cutting the product for distribution, then apply it to perceivable inspiration (reality) being cut into suggested information (fiction) for all those addicted to want suggested over perceivable need...
tl; dr...suggestion cannot be "truth", since everything perceivable exists before any suggestions can be shaped within. You are being tempted to reason (want vs not want) over suggested, which those suggesting rebranded into truth vs lies. Both sides within suggested information can be effortlessly contradicted with perceivable inspiration.
why would I want to be compliant toward people
a) if nature represents the source of need (perceivable); then what those within nature offer each other represents want (suggested).
b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents contract law among choices, hence one choosing to submit to the choices of others.
In short...want implies compliance to those suggesting what one wants, need implies resisting (living) perceivable temptation (process of dying).
If living within the process of dying implies being the resistance within temptation; then EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] represents the temptation to be moved from the response-ability to resist being moved by.
https://pic8.co/sh/kiLy42.jpeg... "let me just use this top secret CIA document to check if the ink in the ball-point pen is still usable".
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] aka animated (inception towards death) form (life). Adaptation of form to flow implies SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe].
Consider the following....flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents transmutation of partial out of whole aka alchemical transmutation of ingredient out of base through "cooking". Next, consider "spirit-cooking" in regard to transmutation of temporary (life) out of ongoing (process of dying).
a) does one need food or does perceivable hunger represents the need forcing one to adapt?
b) what if the process of dying (ongoing loss) "eats" those living within (temporary growth)?
c) nourishment aka NOURISH (cause to grow) + MENT (mind; memory)...what if the process of dying generates the living reactions?
RAW, adjective [Latin crudus, rodo.] - "not altered from its natural state"...what if the state of nature aka the ongoing natural order represents a constantly altering state (flow) for all those within (form)?
"I baptize you with water. But one who is more powerful than I will come...He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire" ~Luke 3:16
Flow (velocity) causes momentum (balance), within which form (resistance) generates. If flow and form meet within momentum, then that implies friction, vibration; resonance; heat..."do you smell what the ROCK (Latin rupes, rumpo, to break) is cooking?"
a) falling for the temptation of consenting to suggested (cooking) over perceivable (being cooked).
b) lack of self discernment as ingredient (growth) within base (loss), hence resisting, while dissolving (living) within solution (process of dying).