Reverse-engineering of revisionism...all suggested words imply perceivable meaning put together under a suggestible umbrella. Detaching the suggested meaning from the perceivable "pre-defined" meaning brings dissonance back into resonance.
Suggested words upon perceivable sound are like too much background noise when mixing music...gotta cut out some.
All things are apart. All things are a part.
Apart from one another, while each one part within whole oneness..."all for one and one for all".
Smile and wave "at" the insanity
"from within"...IN (within) SANUS (sound).
uneaten tax money
a) hence the consequence of ones choice to want more than needed...
b) resisting suggested income implies avoiding suggested tax collection. Meanwhile, perceivable income is always offered towards ones free evaluation.
they store it in their cheeks
Those who direct tax-collectors don't do it to collect, but to prevent tax-payers from collecting for self, hence tempting them to want more of what they cannot hold onto.
The "cheeky" tax-collectors, trying to skim from the top, lack to comprehend that the landmine-layers are also directed from the top down to make sure the chain of command doesn't sway from the path.
zoetropes
Portable epilepsy.
never be stored amidst the cans of soup
The one downside to using jars for canning...it becomes harder and harder to successfully plant a "snake in a can".
I get that if one knocks-off the price and quality of suggested goods, then advertising them as knocked-down bads could be an issue, by why would those pointing out "knock-offs" associate their goods with whatever bad others knocked them down to?
Could suggested "good" represent a brand more valuable, than whatever "bad" others could do to it?
they knocked off...
The process of dying does that to everything the living want to hold onto...others mimic this with suggested narratives to distract one from resisting the want to hold onto for the need to resist.
The rhythm the heart beats in response to is always there...absence represents the choice of the partial to ignore wholeness. Abstinence from suggested distractions, allows the heartbeat to re-calibrate with the natural order.
Get that high ground
Everyone already got it...being HIGH (temporary evaluation) within GROUND (ongoing value), hence the highest value representing evaluation.
all the way to the horizon
The way (inception towards death) generates the HOR'IZON, noun [Gr. to bound, a limit.] aka it's momentum (balance) for the formed choices at the center. Without discerning ones position at the center, the out of reach horizon will keep tempting one off-balance.
Notice that other ones can exist at the limit of ones horizon, yet wanting to catch up with others, keeps ones horizon as unreachable as ever...
It's lookin' rather rusty these days, ain't it?
Nah..a string of yarn would keep those who willingly ignore response-ability (choice) chained to the suggestions of others. Consent represents the chain and ignorance keeps it in shape. Those who resist the temptation to consent to suggested, can try to rattle the chain of others, but ignorance will prevent recognition thereof.
I think I've got a Rope of Command
Showing off adaptation skills at chain of command inspection day will get ya noticed...
Reverse-engineering of revisionism...all suggested words imply perceivable meaning put together under a suggestible umbrella. Detaching the suggested meaning from the perceivable "pre-defined" meaning brings dissonance back into resonance.
Suggested words upon perceivable sound are like too much background noise when mixing music...gotta cut out some.
Apart from one another, while each one part within whole oneness..."all for one and one for all".
"from within"...IN (within) SANUS (sound).
a) hence the consequence of ones choice to want more than needed...
b) resisting suggested income implies avoiding suggested tax collection. Meanwhile, perceivable income is always offered towards ones free evaluation.
Those who direct tax-collectors don't do it to collect, but to prevent tax-payers from collecting for self, hence tempting them to want more of what they cannot hold onto.
The "cheeky" tax-collectors, trying to skim from the top, lack to comprehend that the landmine-layers are also directed from the top down to make sure the chain of command doesn't sway from the path.
Portable epilepsy.
The one downside to using jars for canning...it becomes harder and harder to successfully plant a "snake in a can".
I get that if one knocks-off the price and quality of suggested goods, then advertising them as knocked-down bads could be an issue, by why would those pointing out "knock-offs" associate their goods with whatever bad others knocked them down to?
Could suggested "good" represent a brand more valuable, than whatever "bad" others could do to it?
The process of dying does that to everything the living want to hold onto...others mimic this with suggested narratives to distract one from resisting the want to hold onto for the need to resist.
LUM'BER, noun - "any thing useless and cumbersome, or things bulky and thrown aside as of no use; harm; mischief; heaped together in disorder"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/lumber
About that revisionism...
The rhythm the heart beats in response to is always there...absence represents the choice of the partial to ignore wholeness. Abstinence from suggested distractions, allows the heartbeat to re-calibrate with the natural order.
Everyone already got it...being HIGH (temporary evaluation) within GROUND (ongoing value), hence the highest value representing evaluation.
The way (inception towards death) generates the HOR'IZON, noun [Gr. to bound, a limit.] aka it's momentum (balance) for the formed choices at the center. Without discerning ones position at the center, the out of reach horizon will keep tempting one off-balance.
Notice that other ones can exist at the limit of ones horizon, yet wanting to catch up with others, keeps ones horizon as unreachable as ever...
Nah..a string of yarn would keep those who willingly ignore response-ability (choice) chained to the suggestions of others. Consent represents the chain and ignorance keeps it in shape. Those who resist the temptation to consent to suggested, can try to rattle the chain of others, but ignorance will prevent recognition thereof.
Showing off adaptation skills at chain of command inspection day will get ya noticed...