Because agreement vs disagreement binds both sides reasoning against each other to the same suggestion to reason over. The few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning about suggested.

Agreement vs disagreement, round vs flat; want vs not want...either side consents to suggested (want); while ignoring perceivable (need). Changing sides keeps one within the same conflict of reason. Reasoning over suggested represents a mental hamster-wheel, while giving those making the suggestions the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.

Instead of reasoning about suggested surroundings...how about discerning oneself to represent the center (perceiving) of everything surrounding (perceivable)?