- PERHAPS', adverb - "by chance"
- CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"
If one represents effect (life); then lack of self discernment keeps cause (inception towards death) unknown to self.
In other words...knowledge (perceivable) can be ignored for understanding (suggested), which in return tempts effect to ignore cause.
Notice that the few are suggesting the many to "take a chance"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/abba/takeachanceonme.html
Edit: Right when she sings "it's magic"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/46mg3kCL.png
Could it be that you associate "rerun" with "coherence"? I simple slapped the old narrative labels onto the new narrative labels; which you seem to view as coherent with your labeled worldview.
All the other stuff I write about deals with what happens underneath those labels aka underneath suggested narratives.
COHERENT, adjective - "sticking together". One only sticks together with what one chooses to hold onto....nature needs to be let go.
- The Hague (Bolsheviks)
- The Farmers (Kulak)
- The Farmers Party (Mensheviks)
A rerun by the farmers of men...Rothschild aka Bauer (German; farmer).
- PLEDGE, noun [Latin plico.] - "something put in pawn; that which is deposited with another"
- RELIGION, noun [Latin religo] - "to bind anew"
Ones consent to the suggestion of another represents ones pledge to put ones consent in pawn by binding it anew to the suggesting other.
Furthermore...ignoring perceivable (need to sustain life) for suggested (want luring towards death) represents a death-pledge.
forgive
FORWARDS (inception towards death) GIVES (life)....those who got; need to resist the want to hold onto.
correct path
Inception towards death represents the only path for life. Others suggest one to follow paths as to tempt one to ignore resisting perceivable path.
Can we install a...model?
a) any artificial model tempts one to ignore natural modus operandi.
b) STALL, noun - " a fixed spot"...being (life) implies within motion (inception towards death)...others suggest "install" aka within (in) a fixed spot (stall) as the inversion thereof. It's on oneself to discern the difference...
I told...they did anyway
a) "do vs don't" implies wanting vs not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable..."being done by".
b) do because evil or do because good or don't do because evil or don't do because good...all suggested temptations to ignore perceivable.
c) consider the perceivable need to breathe...is there really a do vs don't conflict involved?
To tie this to your other post...the core of a sliced apple; held within ones hand, "allegedly" represents the foundation for each Hebrew letter; depending one ones changing perspective while looking at it.
obama legalized propaganda
a) U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (Smith-Mundt) aimed propaganda at foreigners; which was changed through Obama to domestic use.
b) all suggested information represents propagated temptation to ignore perceivable inspiration aka propagandism.
c) being (life) implies within propagation (inception towards death).
In short: propaganda (words) or propagation (sound)...it's a choice.
a) do others require suggested confirmation for ones existence?
b) suggested "I think; therefore I am" tempts one to ignore that thinking implies reaction to enacting input..."I think; therefore all thinkable was". Knowledge (whole) enables thinking (partials).
c) if "I AM NOT" is impossible; then why proclaim "I AM"?
d) consider a line from Eminem: "I am whatever you say I am...if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?
Next notice that the song is called: the way I am aka I (life) am way (inception towards death)...not whatever others say "I am".
tl;dr: "I" represents a claim...within a moving system; any claim represents ones ignorance of motion.
toughness or solutions
Ongoing solution (inception towards death) generates temporary resistance (life)...the more one chooses to resist; the tougher one gets.
sound like it will aid
Free "will" of choice represents ones instrument to aid self within sound. Others tempt one to choose alike; while ignoring that each choice implies difference.
Example...hitting oneself in the face over and over again represents "alike" behavior; yet each hit will have different consequences.
doom porn
Others suggest progressivism (final days before...); which when consented to represents ones want or not want of outcome. Want represents temptation aka lust aka porn; while outcome for life represents death aka doom.
Any suggested outcome tempts life to focus towards death (doom); want suggested outcome, while ignoring need to adapt to perceivable origin, shapes ones addiction to want to experience the climax of the suggested outcome...that's porn. Notice also that no suggested doom porn is ever enough for those addicted; which in return tempts the happy merchants to shape "horrors beyond imagination" when writing narratives.
understand the situation
a) to "stand under" implies a submissive position within an oppressive situation.
b) being implies an expressing position (life) within an impressing situation (inception towards death) aka expressed growth within impressing loss.
take to end
Living within the process of dying implies need to let go by resisting want to hold onto temptation...taking burdens living; hence restricting resistance until life ends.
chaos
Chaos (life) can only exist within order (inception towards death)...that's why those within natural order need to resist the want to hold onto, which represents a chaotic balance (momentum) within order (motion).
Others suggest one to seek "order out of chaos"; hence tempting one to ignore the impressing natural order for something being suggested that can be found by progressing forwards.
Order (inception towards death) out of chaos (life) represents the inversion of chaos (life) within order (inception towards death).
- MED'ICINE, noun (Latin medicina, from medeor, to cure) - "any substance, liquid or solid, that has the property of curing or mitigating disease in animals".
a) "disease in animals" implies dis-ease (life) within animation (inception towards death)...others cannot heal that, hence allopathy aka ALLOS (others) PATHEIA (suffering; disease).
b) EASE, noun (Latin otium.) - "rest; an undisturbed state". Life implies a state (living) disturbed by motion (process of dying)...hence no rest for the WICKED, adjective - "to depart, to fall away".
c) sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."medicine man" aka "man represents medicine".
argue about how it was only "perceivable"...
That's the issue...perceivable demands adaptation; arguing implies ones choice to ignore adaptation for reasoning over suggested with others. One cannot argue (refute a proposition) with nature...only with other ones...or with oneself if desperate.
to sell you addiction
a) ADDICT'; verb - "to apply one's self habitually"...wanting to buy what others suggest to sell represents that habit.
b) HAB'IT, noun - "to have to hold" tempts one to ignore that -TION - "action" (inception towards death) cannot be held onto by the reactions (life) within.
I'm against...licensing
Being for or against suggested "license" gives permission of suggested over perceivable.
LI'CENSE, noun (Latin licentia, from liceo, to be permitted)...everything licensed represents "shit few got away with thanks to consent by many".
should have the CHOICE to go to...
a) if you can you take a step towards any direction; then you had the free will of choice to do so.
b) "should" implies want for suggested outcome; free will of choice implies needed reaction within perceivable origin (being enacted upon).
Being able to choose direction implies being (life) directed (inception towards death) by motion.
I'm against all professional...
a) ...professes ones willing consent to not want suggested professions.
b) consider the implication (if/then) of: "I'm against perceivable"...doesn't that just imply ignorance?
You will lose
It's the only way for temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...yet...until then it's growing season.
they will win
Only if one chooses to ignore that ongoing loss (value) offers temporary growth (evaluation). Life isn't about winning more, but about experiencing everything offered while wielding free will of choice.
youtube
If one represents vision (presence; sight; view; perception) within visible (perceivable); then choosing to look into a suggested tube restricts ones vision aka tunnel-vision.
advertisement
Latin advertir - "to remark" aka respond to suggested mark; hence marking out within mind (advertir-ment).
How to avoid such a mark? BEAST aka BE (being) ASTUTE (keen in discernment and careful of one's self-interest)...
With a "docked oar" a vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) will have trouble steering.
Lourdes and Rocco are representing the Ciccone line; so her life hasn't been just in vain so far.
we need a way to submit grievances
a) if inception towards death represents the way of life; then does living within imply submission or resistance?
b) grievance implies struggling with burden...resisting the temptation to burden self would lessen burden, while growing resistance.
LEGAL (from leg-) - "to collect; gather"...represents the suggested temptation to burden self by consent; which in return tempts one to submit grievances to those suggesting.
democracy is fake
DEMOS (common people) KRATOS (strength)...strength of a people implies each ones resistance; others tempt people together through common-ism; which makes the many weaker than the few.
Resisting demos grows kratos...
a) if one chooses to ignore natural law (perceivable) for suggested laws; then others will seek to legislate (lobby) one. Consent represents acceptance of suggested.
b) nature sets itself apart (LAW aka land air water); those within tempt partials back together (LEGAL; from leg; to collect; gather).
c) within perceivable (inception towards death) one represents resistance (life); while suggested tempts one to follow (laws) while punishing (law enforcement) resistance (crime).
d) perceivable: "resistance is fertile" or suggested: "resistance is futile"...it's ones free will of choice.
Anarcho-Capitalism (Voluntaryism)
a) ANARCH (leader of leaderlessness)...an anarch-ist follows suggested anarch-ism.
b) those who suggest capitalism gain all the capital; while those who consent get buried under debt.
c) consenting to suggested -isms "binds" one to another aka voluntary slavery to a "chain" of command.
...is the way
Can any suggested way direct life out of the boundaries of being one the way from inception towards death?
the power of the media
Location in-between perceiving and perceivable gives suggested media (Latin medius; middle) its power to distract former (resistance) from latter (velocity). Without velocity resistance couldn't grow; which in return gives those suggesting the opportunity to exploit lack of resistance.
It ain't about what's on the suggested screen, but that one ignores perceivable for it.
wiped from the collective consciousness
Media and its suggested information mimics the mind/memory of the consenting many, which allows them to advertise (play); collectivize (record); revise (rew/fwd); epitomize (pause) and abolish (stop) it.
The media and all other suggested institutions represent organized habits. These habits exist only within the minds/memories of the consenting viewer; who can then be domesticated by suggested instructions. The fundamental habit exploited represents mass consent to ignore need (letting go) for want (holding onto); hence HABITUAL (Latin habere; to hold; posses).
Every suggested information tempts one to consent by holding onto it; while all perceivable inspiration inspires one to adapt, while letting go of what goes through ones adapting mind/memory.
Inspiration represents a spark to enlighten; while information represents a pile of trash waiting for a spark to burn it all down; hence information representing a burned offering to the spark of inspiration.
you signed the consent form to take the poison and on the consent form it said there could be side effects
What is easier...suggesting poison; consent forms and side-effect lists or consenting to poison self; while ignoring side-effects?
In other words...is it easier to suggest a temptation or to consent to it?
So when you die, its your fault...
What's the implication of "self" sustenance?
(((They))) believe...
A many believe by consenting to what is being suggested to them by a few...who's suggesting anything for the few to believe?
Which mind is less restricted by the suggestions from others...those who consent to believe or those who suggest others to consent to believe?
to have poison injected into your infant's body so the death or disability of your child is your fault, not ((theirs)).
a) if poison represents the sacrificial altar; then who brings the child to it? Are the needle-jews coming to the children or are the parents bringing their children to the needle-jews?
b) what has more effect on parents consenting to the needle-jews...the suggestions by the needle-jews to come or the social pressure from others suggesting one to go the needle-jews?
c) does nature have a perceivable fault or could it be those within nature ignoring perceivable for suggested, which leads to them experiencing faults?
d) what if a parasitic few represent the fault of an ignorant many; hence ignorance representing the host for parasitic exploitation? Furthermore...what if ignorance prevents one from seeing the balance (opportunity) underneath a host/parasite dynamic?
convincing entire populations to commit suicide.
a) ones choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) implies suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion.
b) the suicidal ignorance of the many towards perceivable is being exploited through genocidal suggestions by the few; who sell the many the means to destroy themselves.
c) commerce isn't needed; religion isn't needed; healthcare isn't needed; entertainment isn't needed; politics isn't needed; civilization isn't needed; scientism (or any other -ism) isn't needed; artificial isn't needed; suggested isn't needed...as long as the many want; so long will they reap the consequences of ignoring need.
a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists
Existence doesn't require belief; it (action) forces adaptation (reaction) from everything within...suggested beliefs tempt one to ignore reacting to perceivable. The more one ignores perceivable for believing or disbelieving suggested; the less about perceivable one can discern.
Ones willing ignorance of perceivable gives those suggesting the power of ones consent to conspire behind ones veil of ignorance.
mind has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced
a) reality realizes mind/memory; those wielding mind/memory can choose to fill it with suggestions by others, which in return tempts them to ignore perceivable reality.
b) good vs evil implies a mind/memory (self) inflicted by reason (conflict over suggested); hence one viewing reality (balance) through the lens of fiction (imbalance).
c) reality operates on implication (if/then); others tempt one with suggested fiction into reasoning (want vs not want); which tempts one to ignore implication.
a) PSYCHE; noun - "animating spirit"...spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies ones resistance within animation.
b) an -iST represents one who consents to a suggested -ISM, hence ignoring resistance for submission.
c) animation directs (inception towards death) resistance (life); while a psychiatrist PRESCRIBES; verb - "to write down as a direction" to tempt one to follow directions instead of resisting.
a) mental (Latin mentis; mind/memory) represents ones wavering condition within persistent motion, hence one being able to memorize moving input.
b) CONDITION (Latin condicioun) - "particular mode of being" implies being partial mind/memory within whole input.
If one lacks discernment about that, then others can suggest CON (together) DICERE (to speak) aka tempting partials together through suggested words.