The "leaders" of our nations aren't in charge.
a) only within direction can one lead others to follow.
b) direction (inception towards death) charges reactions (life)...reactions wield the free will of choice to react, while being directed, as to recharge self...the other choice represents ignorance.
to distract from the global symmetry
Suggested words (asymmetrical) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (symmetrical). In other words...within motion sound goes on; while words shaped within motion tempt one to hold onto them.
of the plot
PLOT, verb - "to delineate"; hence distracting other ones (life) from line (inception towards death). And here again...the process of dying implies symmetry within motion (velocity); while living within represents asymmetry within motion (resistance).
Nazis Are Socialists, Not Right-Wing... THEY'RE MARXIST COLLECTIVISTS, No Better Than Filthy Commies
Here again...nazism + socialism + nihilism (no) + rightism + marxism + collectivism + communism.
Consenting to each one of these suggested -isms tempts one into a conflict of reason against one another. Those who suggested the -isms are not participating within these conflicts of reason. Instead, they gained control over both sides of every conflict of reason.
All you brainwashed racist retards out here need to wake the fuck up, because there is absolutely no difference between soviet (international) socialism and national socialism!
a) nature implies the same source for every different effect within; those within nature suggest different -isms to distract from the same source.
b) racism + retardism + absolutism + nihilism (no) + sovietism + internationalism + socialism + nationalism...all these -isms are being suggested by the few, while wielded by an unsuspecting many against one another.
all you...need to
a) "you" implies one among other ones within all.
b) perceivable all (whole) implies need; suggesting ones (partials) represent want...want (suggested) tempts one to ignore need (perceivable).
c) suggesting need tempts (want vs not want) others to ignore perceivable need.
why is "no doxxing" a rule?
Because ones consent to suggested "internet" exposes self to others. Doxxing implies exposure of others by self. Why give those who expose self the privilege to expose others?
- ILL, noun - "discordant"
a) accordance within perceivable sound or DISCORD, noun - "disagreement among persons" over suggestions...it's a choice.
b) adapting to perceivable (resonance) or ignoring it for suggested (dissonance)...one chooses to be ill within a sound environment.
c) suggested SYMPTOM (Latin sinthoma; to fall together) tempts one to ignore DIS (apart) COR (heart)...
d) pandemic aka PAN (all) DEMOS (people) aka whole and partials...partials can only exist within whole.
He survived harder trials...
What do you think is going to be happening timeline wise with this AI stuff
Natural is going on; artificial distracts one from that. Ignoring natural for artificial destroys self; while allowing others to narrate ones destruction.
Example for artificial suggestion...HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance; effect of an unknown cause". Meanwhile...nature implies the cause of knowledge and oneself the effect within.
If the many keep asking "what's happening"; then they are willingly betting on chances suggested to them by a few...that represents gambling aka putting ones life at stake.
where you can talk to it normally and it can understand
Talking to it implies consenting to the suggestion of it; hence submitting to it aka "standing-under" it (understanding). The issue isn't what it can or can't do; but what oneself lacks to comprehend.
What it suggests you was aimed at the resistance of millions before you. In other words...the military industrial complex has utilized suggested information to grind down human resistance within natural by tempting them to willing consent to "it" instead of being the resistance among one another.
Suggested words like "understanding" where repeatedly shoved down the throats of willing or unwilling participants of information warfare until the many were domesticated enough to "want to understand" what others are suggesting them. The more domesticated oneself is; the less others are required to domesticate; hence the introduction of "it" aka the artificial intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand).
You'll be in your fuckin matrix pod, eh?
MA'TRIX, noun (Latin matrix from mater, mother.) - "womb"...off-spring implies springing out off the womb, hence being channeled through birth.
Imagine the chutzpah to get others to say "fucking matrix pod", which implies their mothers womb...
the shots made people stupid and weak
Does consenting to a suggested shot sound smart and strong? Pharmakeia exploits those who seek care of health from others; hence reacting to a weakness that was there before...an opportunity for temptation was offered.
they could not fight back and resist
a) what does it take besides free will of choice to resist a suggestion?
b) what if the fight represents ones consent to want vs not want the suggested; which tempts one to ignore that there's no fight in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested)...only choice.
c) if resistance represents fighting back; then why the fear towards outcomes?
The magic is they don't just control the info, they control the reaction.
Because those who react have already consented to the suggested information, hence becoming malleable by those suggesting it.
That shekel logo ( https://img.gvid.tv/i/3bF9sEST.png )...where have I seen that before? ( https://img.gvid.tv/i/Jyu4fbvF.png)
Sharing is caring...
safe enough
A modest proposal...
biometrics
BIO (life) METRIC (to measure)...only those alive can measure; suggested "biometrics" represent affixed measurements, hence tempting ones mind to hold onto them.
Living implies animation, hence movement (a moving mind)...affixed measurements tempt one to ignore motion as the source for ones animation.
If one ignores animation; then one ignores to RE (respond to) ANIMATE (being animated by)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/23nJPAAQ.jpg
Changing one factor (suggested information) doesn't mean the other does not exist (perceivable inspiration).
What if oneself can be tricked to hold onto factor while ignoring existing?
- FAC'TOR, noun (Latin facio) - "in commerce, an agent employed by merchants, residing in other places, to buy and sell, and to negotiate bills of exchange"
What if suggestion represents the factor negotiating with ones consent?
Isn't he admitting...
- ADMISS'ION, noun (Latin admissio) - "power or permission to enter; entrance; access; power to approach".
a) does anything the few are doing draw the many closer to them?
b) a permission implies given...what is it that the few are giving, while taking everything from the many?
c) what does a suggested "permission to enter" represent for those inside everything perceivable aka those inside everything reality has to offer?
Controlled Perturbation Experiment
- PERTURBA'TION, noun (Latin perturbatio) - "disquiet or agitation of mind; restlessness of passions; great uneasiness; disturbance; disorder; commotion in public affairs".
EX (expression) PER (by) MENT (mind/memory)...ones consent to the suggestions by others implies an expression by ones mind/memory; it implies shaping the suggested into a perturbation, hence agitating ones mind/memory, and it implies giving those suggesting control over the suggested.
one of the funders
a) being one implies being separated from other ones; which implies a foundation (whole) which separates itself (partials) internally.
b) whatever others are suggesting can only distract one from the perceivable foundation, hence the suggested tower of babel keep collapsing; while the foundation remains intact.
c) FUND, noun (Hebrew; to build) - "foundation"...one can build a "foundation" for a house only on another foundation. The artificial foundation (suggestion) tempts one to ignore the natural foundation (perception).
The suggested word "foundation" tempts one to ignore the perceivable foundation for all words...sound.
need to be stopped
This (life) cannot stop that (inception towards death)...others suggest the cessation of motion (stop) to distract one from being moved.
astoundingly realistic...AI
Only if one chooses to ignore realistic (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) can ones mind be astounded (to strike dumb with amazement).
The internet watch foundation
The foundation for watching the internet implies each ones consent to watch what others are suggesting. This choice of consent can then be used by those suggesting to establish fundamental authority over all those willingly submitting to it.
warns the images are realistic enough that it may become harder to spot...
a) those who ignore reality (perceivable) for artifice (suggestion) are here being warned by those suggesting in the name of reality.
b) the implication of such a warning is suggested verification of real amongst "harder to spot" fakes, hence gibs me dats biometrics data.
child abuse images
a) looking at a picture (a captured moment) of a child; tempts one to ignore the momentum of a living child. That ignorance represents the abuse of neglect; which gives others the opportunity to exploit neglected children.
b) adult ignorance represents the guilt which shapes childhood innocence; which in return attracts predators.
c) indulging in captured moments tempts one to want to capture momentum. This represents ones choice of wanting to hold onto; while ignoring the need to let go.
claims of the miraculous
Is it David Copperfield doing miracles or is it the audience, who consents to what he offers, who're wondering how he does it? Latin miraculum "object of wonder" implies as judged through the eyes of the beholder.
Sleight of hand..."I believe in miracles; I believe in you" aka ones consent to the suggestions by others, and consent represents ones choice to want to claim; to hold onto; to possess; to believe what another suggests.
witch
WITCH from wicca; wicker - "soothsayer" aka one who foretells without inspiration aka one who uses suggestion (information) over perception (inspiration).
Nature communicates everything perceivable to each perceiving one within...others tempt one with suggestions to ignore perceivable. That represents witchcraft aka crafting suggested information to deceive others from perceivable inspiration.
The most effective witchcraft....suggested words over perceivable sound aka spell-craft.
Terrorism is being suggested by others; while both ones acceptance and denial consents to the suggested.
Is there maybe another option for ones choice, then wanting vs not wanting the suggestions by others? Maybe something that isn't being suggested by others?
How to spot...
Taking the yarmulke off reveals a spot...
Click on Free Will of Chat GPT's profile
Which implies having a choice...
Notice it has NO original posts of it's own
a) only nature offers; those within can only react to whats offered.
b) inception towards death (flow) represents the origin for life (form).
c) how could an "it" own anything? More importantly...IT, pronoun - "standing for any thing except males and females"...how could such an it exist?
Notice that it literally just tries to re-define every word in every single one of your posts
- DEFINE, verb (Latin; to end, to limit, from finis, end)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/define
a) why would one alive consent to suggested definitions; hence limitations tempting towards an end to life?
b) only within perceivable sound can one shape a suggestible word.
c) what's in-between sound and word? LET'TER, noun - "one who permits; retards or hinders". Words represent letters put together; sound implies the ones hearing it being set apart from one another.
Notice that it actually has no input or original thought
a) what if there's a difference between those waiting for others to suggest them information, and one who simply adapts to being put into an ongoing flow of perceivable inspiration?
In short...only within origin can one think aka being subjected to input.
b) "actually has no"... how could action (actual) have nothing (no) when everything exist within motion?
de-railing
What if the train (life) can't get off the rail (inception towards death)? What if suggested "de-rail-ment" implies ones ignorant mind?
a) IN (being within) SECT (Latin seco; to divide)
b) WEAPON (instrument of offense) aka ones weapon of choice.
Suggesting "weapon" and "insect" represents the temptation for one to ignore the implied choice within division (balance). If the few suggest weapon; then many think knife; pistol; rifle etc. and if the few suggest insect; then the many think bugs; locusts; spiders etc. A simple distraction; allowing use of symbolism to sustain their narratives.
a) suggestion implies effect within perceivable source, hence one choosing to ignore perceivable when shaping suggestions.
b) "source has no"...implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothingness); while ignoring that perceivable source has everything to offer.
c) what does a link represent? A division of a chain, hence the one linking consenting to be within a chain of command to those suggesting what to link.
d) motion communicates itself as implication (if/then)...however those within choose to react implies the enacting foundation of motion.
e) choice implies being send (through balance aka the momentum of motion)...choosing to ignore being send represents CON (negation; argument; voting against a proposal).
Others suggest "consent" to tempt one to ignore implied "adaptation"...choice must choose; ones choice is tempted to consent to suggested choices by others.
"the" project...is moving forward.
a) PROJECT', verb (Latin projicio; pro, forward, and jacio, to throw.)...aka moving forward.
b) suggested the-ism tempts one to submit to authority of others, while ignoring to resist (life) being projected (inception towards death) aka moved forwards.
arts commission
a) ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition of natural" aka ones ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
b) COMMISSION, noun - "to entrust; charge; order; mandate; authority given" aka ones submission to another when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
"here's the article"...
That implies your consent to suggested the-ism and your consent to artificial suggestion, hence giving others commission to do so.
There's no information about the surveillance system.
Ones consent to suggested information implies ones submission to another; which positions the other above oneself; hence establishing a high ground for surveillance.
Willing submission of many represents high-ground for authority by few.
Aka suggested the-ism + illuminism + creationism.
Ones consent to any suggestion by others implies ones ignorance of perceivable. Those who ignore perceivable are destroying self and others, hence others tempting one to give suicidal consent to genocidal suggestions.
Example...pornography represents a temptation, yet the moment one consents to it, suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion is being established. All suggested -ism represent temptations to ignore perceivable.
Ones consent to suggested moralism tempts one into a conflict of reason (guilty vs innocence). This tempts one to ignore perceivable...IN (being within) NOCENCE; NOCERE (harm) aka being (life) within harm (inception towards death).
What about guilt? Response-ability (life) senses temptation (inception towards death) while in-nocence (within harms way).
All languages are suggested by the few as tools of miscommunication among the consenting many aka spell-craft. Nature communicates itself as perceivable sound; those within tempt each other with suggested words to ignore that.