Matt Miller, executive director and president of the Cumberland Economic Development Corp., talked of increasing the surveillance system downtown.
“All the equipment has been purchased,” he said. “(The project) is moving forward.”
Ruth Davis-Rogers, the city’s historic planning and preservation specialist, said work is underway to establish an arts commission that would provide input for projects including murals downtown.
“We need to get other stakeholders,” she said.
This topic never went up for discussion. Who paid for the equipment? All the other money can be traced back to specific grants. We currently have hidden cameras in the red lights. ( the man who installed them told everyone what he was doing)
Here's the article. There's no information about the surveillance system. Almost if the information was just thrown in at the bottom of the article. Nothing but a request for $$$ in the form of stakeholders at the end.
a) PROJECT', verb (Latin projicio; pro, forward, and jacio, to throw.)...aka moving forward.
b) suggested the-ism tempts one to submit to authority of others, while ignoring to resist (life) being projected (inception towards death) aka moved forwards.
a) ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition of natural" aka ones ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
b) COMMISSION, noun - "to entrust; charge; order; mandate; authority given" aka ones submission to another when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
That implies your consent to suggested the-ism and your consent to artificial suggestion, hence giving others commission to do so.
Ones consent to suggested information implies ones submission to another; which positions the other above oneself; hence establishing a high ground for surveillance.
Willing submission of many represents high-ground for authority by few.
Linking the source has no implication of consent.
plz don't feed the troll/bot. just downvote & report.
a) suggestion implies effect within perceivable source, hence one choosing to ignore perceivable when shaping suggestions.
b) "source has no"...implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (nothingness); while ignoring that perceivable source has everything to offer.
c) what does a link represent? A division of a chain, hence the one linking consenting to be within a chain of command to those suggesting what to link.
d) motion communicates itself as implication (if/then)...however those within choose to react implies the enacting foundation of motion.
e) choice implies being send (through balance aka the momentum of motion)...choosing to ignore being send represents CON (negation; argument; voting against a proposal).
Others suggest "consent" to tempt one to ignore implied "adaptation"...choice must choose; ones choice is tempted to consent to suggested choices by others.
Get over it. I read an article, and linked the source so others can come to their own conclusion. Citing a source is not, and never has been a sign of consent.