Actor Angus Cloud
Euphoria was "directed" by Augustine Frizzell; Sam Levinson; Jennifer Morrison and Pippa Bianco...following directions implies reacting; not acting.
Others use their free will of choice to suggest "acting" as to tempt ones free will of choice to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
Shirking ones response-ability (choice) onto others, tempts one into the state of EUPHORIA (feeling healthy and comfortable especially when sick).
Edit: ANGUS (from gusto; choice) CLOUD (obscured)
a) nature tempts one to want to hold onto; while inspiring one to resist temptations through the need to let go.
b) consenting to what others are suggesting becomes ones burden to carry, while representing the exponentially increasing debt to others.
c) DEBT, noun (Latin debitum, contracted) - "that which is due from one person to another"...ones consent to the suggestions of others represents the contract aka DUE (to bind) aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew).
Being implies "set apart"...contracted represents "drawn together". Others suggest contracts to destroy ones apartheid, which when consented to gives others the power of ones consent to collectivize those drawn together.
Sleight of hand: "drawn together"...animated sitcom created by Dave Jeser and Matt Silverstein.
change or transformation
a) transformation (life) within change (inception towards death)
b) OR implies ones free will of choice to react to being enacted upon.
what's holding up
a) center of surrounding...held up or kept down?
b) what if life; while being moved from inception towards death, is neither held up or kept down, but processed within, while fluctuating?
a) waste (inception towards death) turned into prosperous (life)...those alive are being tricked to view their surrounding as waste instead of opportunity.
b) others suggest "settling down" to distract from being (life) dissolved (inception towards death) within; which implies ones need of resistance.
c) whatever one builds tempts others to want it. One needs to resist want, hence need to let go over want to hold onto.
For example...giving a fox access to ones chicken coop shapes the fox into a weaker predator, while protecting ones coop inspires a predator to adapt, hence growing more efficient.
d) nation implies "a people"...not their position. Why are the "white" people so weak? Because they believe in white nations; in white communities; in white societies...in other words...they were tricked to attach themselves to suggested umbrellas (national-ism; commune-ism and social-ism).
e) what if he-brew his-story and jew fell for it? The many are being tricked to hold onto a suggested "history" that only a few define; redefine and contradict at will, hence writing the narratives as they go, while the many follow along stumbling over themselves.
f) bantu aka BA (plural prefix) NTU (person)...person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies singular aka from whole (sound) into partials (instruments).
Others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self. It ain't "we the people"; it's each one within all.
Consenting to suggested (information) screws up ones perception of reality (inspiration).
he does not perceive you as an enemy
Because he willingly consented to your suggestions, hence putting himself into submission to your authority.
weaponization of minorities
The above example shows the weaponization of majority (black) against minority (white). Ask yourself why jews can utilize majority against minority; while being less than the minority?
replacement
Response (re) to position (place) of mind/memory (ment)...why do the so called jews utilize maximum number of bodies (black) vs minimum number of bodies (white), when it's about "mind/memory"?
weaponization
- WEAPON (instrument of offense)
- IZE (verb denoting doing of noun)
- ATION (action)
a) action generates reactions; sound generates instruments...ones "weapon of choice" represents reacting instrument within enacting sound.
b) VERB (denotes action) doesn't generate NOUN (name; word that denotes a thing)...others utilize their weapon of choice to suggest nouns; names; brands; idols; fiction etc. which they do VERBALLY (speech aka spell-craft).
white privilege
a) PRIVUS (separate) LEX (law) aka separated (partials) within law (whole), hence living within the process of dying.
b) being implies within the momentum of motion, hence as choice within spectrum of white/black balance.
In short...status quo of being implies privilege within SPEC'TRUM (visible form).
the future
a) motion doesn't produce a "next moment" (future)...only ongoing momentum aka perceivable moment for those within.
b) suggested past; present and future tempt one to ignore perceivable "now". Can one suggest what was without ignoring that which now is perceivable?
c) consenting to suggested THE-ism gives others the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict suggested "future" at will.
a) what if Scott Ian Rosenfeld + Daniel A. Lilker represent "a malignant disease in sheep and cattle" aka ANTHRAX (virulent ulcer) for those consenting to what they suggest?
b) what's the implication of suggesting "live coal" aka "combustible living" to those who consent to it?
wont be able to get your degree
Others suggest that to distract one from being DEGREE aka portion (life) within progression (inception towards death). Consenting to stand under (understand) others tempts one to ignore degree of elevation.
a passing grade
GRADE (Hebrew; descend)...being implies ascend (life) within descend (inception towards death). Others tempt one to seek passing grades, while ignoring to grow self.
organs of learning
a) OR'GAN (natural instrument of action by which some process is carried on)...reaction represents the instrument within the process of enacting sound.
If partial perception adapts to perceivable whole; then that implies to learn/teach self and vice versa...anything suggested by others tempts one to ignore self discernment.
b) perceivable represents organ (momentum aka balance); ones perception within represents instrument (choice).
who controls
a) control represents restriction, being implies as "free" will of choice within "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
b) "who" refers to person; while person implies per (by) sonos (sound)...sound controls who-ever freely chooses resonance or dissonance within.
What are the odds?
Partial odds (life) within even whole (inception towards death).
taught about science
SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know; to perceive) implies learning/teaching self by adapting to perceivable...consenting to suggested scientism tempts one to ignore self for others.
Understanding (suggested) represents the inversion of knowledge (perceivable) and ones submission to "stand under" another.
is wrong
a) one cannot suggest others what "is" without ignoring that everything perceivable "was" before any suggestion could be shaped within.
b) right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need). Nature isn't right or wrong...it was change before those within can reason against each other what's right or wrong.
disinformation
a) each suggested information tempts one to ignore all perceivable inspiration, hence ones consent to suggested information representing self imposed disinformation.
b) being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...others suggest IN-FORM-ATION (within form through action) as the inversion thereof.
c) IN-SPIRIT-ATION implies being within SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form to flow) of action. Adaptation implies reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion).
belief is false
To believe implies to consent to suggested information as "truth"; which allows others to contradict it as "false". Why? Because consenting to suggested implies holding onto it, which tempts one to ignore being within motion...motion represents the need to let go and the temptation to want to hold onto.
In short...nature doesn't communicate truth or false; it communicates momentum of motion aka change.
futuristic...advanced...integrated
a) inception (past) to life (present) to death (future)...implies need to resist origin, while being tempted by wanted outcomes.
b) suggested integer (entire) tempts one to ignore being fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable).
vibrant...not 1 person
Vibration implies per (by) sonos (sound)...only within sound can there be vibration (resonance/dissonance).
I had chatGPT talking to Bing AI...
That's how one builds ghost cities...by taking oneself out of the picture.
extinction (to put an end to) rebellion (to rise in opposition)
Being implies rising (life) within opposition to loss (inception towards death)...hence the need to rebel (growth by resistance) against extinction (loss through velocity).
The few suggest the label "extinction rebellion" to tempt the many against others, while ignoring to sustain self. Spending resistance on others tempts one to ignore being resistance within velocity, which in return gives others the opportunity to exploit ones lack of resistance.
will know...when everything the public believes
To believe represents ones consent to the suggested information (understanding) by others; while ignoring perceivable inspiration (knowledge).
What is real and true then?
Perceivable represents reality (need); suggested true (want) or false (not want) represent fiction...fiction represents ones ignorance of reality.
This crowd here is already aware
Awareness implies as partial (perception) within whole (perceivable)...others suggest "crowd" (multitude) to distract one (singular) from self.
Sleight of hand: STEPHEN (Greek Stephanos; that which surrounds) CROWDER (suggester of multitude); hence multitude surrounding singular...unless resisted.
to enslave
Ones consent to the suggestion of another...enslaves one to another. Slave willingly sets master by shirking response-ability (free will of choice) onto another.
They have been lying to us about our history
a) a lie represents the suggested contradiction of truth...truth represents ones consent to believe a suggestion, while ignoring perceivable.
b) truth (want) vs lie (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need).
c) if he-brew his-story, then jew fell for it by consenting to the suggestion thereof...only oneself can resist suggestion.
They have been lying to us about money/currency
a) suggested currency tempts one to ignore perceivable current (inception towards death)...the former tempts one to bank & trust, while the latter inspires resistance.
b) suggested money (m-one-y aka my one aka an ownership claim over another) tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable). The highest value in existence implies evaluation; hence others tempting one to ignore that for suggested values.
We must assume that when he said "everything" he meant everything.
a) without self discernment of being partial within whole, one lacks comprehension about everything (perceivable).
b) ignoring perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing) gives others the power of ones consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of "nothing".
c) ASSU'ME, verb (Latin assumo) - "to take upon one; differs from receive"...one receives perceivable (need); while being tempted to take suggested (want).
d) a suggestion cannot define meaning; since perceivable existed before one can shape a suggestion about it. Perceivable inspiration represents the flow-state of "predefined meaning" for the formed awareness within to grow comprehension out of by adaptation to it.
Wanting to hold onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore the need to let go of perceivable (inspiration). Try holding onto inspiration and see how that works out...
To distract from that...the few suggest one to seek and hold onto muses, while draining inspiration out of it. To make it worse...MUSE; verb - "to reflect, ponder, meditate; to be absorbed in thought" implies losing oneself musing about suggested information within ones mind/memory.
So, I ask, what is real?
Asking suggested questions and seeking suggested answers tempt one to ignore perceivable solution.
In short: information (fiction) or inspiration (reality)...it's your free will of choice.
How do we live an authentic life?
a) perceivable sound authorizes ones free will of choice within resonance (need) and dissonance (want)...one needs to resist want; while wanting to ignore need.
b) self discernment allows one to comprehend being INSANE (in-sanus; within sound) PERSON (per-sonos; by sound)...suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable sound.
c) suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceivable singular (one) to ignore self. Others suggest US (united states) and "we the people" to distract each consenting one from discerning self.
to know the truth...
...translates to know (perceivable reality) the truth (suggested fiction).
Sleight of hand through leonard cohen: "Everybody knows. That's how it goes"
Immigration (inception) migration (life) emigration (death)...permanent residency doesn't exist within motion.
a) why is it called EQUA'TOR, noun (Latin oequo, to make equal); when being implies one being different than other ones?
b) north/south (front/back) + west/east (left/right)...what if one can only exist at the center of ones surrounding? Is there such a position as front; back; left; right; up; down or does oneself represent the center position wherever one chooses to wander?
being lied to
a) being implies within revelation, hence with free (choice) access (perception) to all that is known (perceivable).
b) others tempt one to believe that suggested represents "truth"; which when consented to allows exploitation through "lies" (contradiction of truth).
c) instead of reasoning about what is true or false; try discerning that everyone wields the free will of choice to shape suggestions to tempt others into ignoring perceivable.
really important
Inception (import) to life (vessel within port) to death (export)...that's how reality imports. Anything suggested by others represents a fictitious import into ones consenting mind/memory.
All corrupt
CORRUPT, verb - "to break, separate or dissolve"...all (whole) corrupts (partials) internally.
only possible way
Only one way (inception towards death) makes ones (life) possible.
to have peace...
...implies one consent to oppose war within a conflict. Choosing peace (want) over war (not want) or war (want) over peace (not want) implies the same conflict from a different side.
One exists in-between need/want (balance)...ignoring this puts one into want vs not want (imbalance). Choice ignoring balance imbalances choice.
...ism should be the norm.
The few suggest norms as a standard (a position in battle to serve as a rallying point for a military force) for the conflicts of reason among the many.
Nature represents an ongoing order; setting those within free to choose how to react, which represents a chaotic state of being...others suggest -isms to tempt one to behave according to norms; to standards; to rules of behavior; to moralism; uniformity etc.
The few suggest the many to consent by "free" will of choice to "bind" themselves to norms.
You don't mix...
Being implies partial within whole, hence the natural order (action) setting itself apart into chaotic choices (reaction)...from same into difference; both in balance with each other.
Others suggest mixing aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka equality through diversity aka uniformity; unicode; university; universal serial bus; universal pictures; universal studios; united states; united nations; european union; unicef aka migration; miscegenation; melting pot and so on...
Ones consent to the suggestions by others implies oneself binding self to others, hence mixing. Self discernment has to be grown by self; hence apart from others, not together.
The suggested word "together" implies "towards getting", which tempts life to ignore being moved towards death. Towards implies within loss...not towards getting.
so contradictory to each other
Before one can contradict each other; one exists apart from one another...this one ignores when reasoning about suggested contradictions.
known since Aristotle.
Knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); aristotelianism represents suggested (information)....consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable.
It's how the elderly tend to go. They lose their will to live, stop eating, and slowly fade away.
a) growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) implies free "will" of choice, hence ones instrument of resistance.
b) resistance drowns within velocity, hence inspiring the need to grow resistance by resisting wanted.
c) hunger consumes everything within unless resisted by eating...others suggest stop (cessation of motion) to distract one from that.
d) slowly fading away represents ones lack of discernment about being slow (growth through resistance) within fast (loss through velocity). Loss drowns growth fast unless resisted.
Problems (life) can only exist temporarily within ongoing solution (inception towards death)...all problems exist within the process of being dissolved.
Others tempt one to seek suggested solutions for suggested problems, while ignoring the only perceivable solution aka the natural order aka momentum of motion.
The few suggest problems to distract the many from PROB'LEM, noun (Latin pello; Greek to throw forward)...hence being (life) thrown forwards (from inception towards death).
my mind wants peace and stability now
a) instable (life) within stable (inception towards death)...only within momentum of change can one be changeable.
b) want implies versus not want; peace implies versus war...mind/memory exists in-between need/want (balance); oneself chooses to hold onto want vs not want (imbalance).
c) instable choice cannot hold onto stable balance; it needs to adapt aka balancing as choice. Learn to let go of imbalance by repeatedly adapting to balance aka choosing to resist the want to hold onto for the need to let go.
living in the matrix
a) matter can only form within the matrix (momentum) of motion.
b) matrix as in mother (Latin mater) aka uterus; womb; origin implies momentum of motion (begetting; pregnancy) to form off-spring.
c) each off-spring implies being sprung into (life) momentum (inception towards death), hence living within the matrix.
scientists unveil
-IST (scientist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (scientism), while ignoring perceivable SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know aka to perceive)...ones ignorance of perceivable represents the veil over ones eyes, which allows others to unveil suggested.
brain cell
CELL (Latin celare; to hide, conceal)...perceivable inspiration can be concealed and hidden from the ones willingly ignoring it for suggested information...such information is being stored within ones mind/memory, hence misusing "brain cell" as a storage room for rubbish aka ones own mental prison.
ai
a) artificial (suggested) implies ones ignorance of natural (perceived).
b) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies standing under the suggestions of others; while ignoring to grow ones comprehension within perceivable knowledge.
Whenever one uses "AI" one consents to stand under (understand) those who suggest it, hence establishing others as ones "intelligence agents".
five eyes
Look into FVEY... https://genius.com/artists/Shihad
Muh firmament!!!
FIRM (fixed) A (one) MENT (mind/memory)...consenting to suggested information affixes it within ones mind/memory.
a) perceivable implies value; ones perception represents evaluation...choosing to ignore this for suggested prices tempts one to devalue self; while giving others the power to manipulate prices.
b) the cost of living implies dying, hence everyone has to pay. While alive; each one represents "free" will of choice to resist paying.