Partial odds (life) within even whole (inception towards death).
taught about science
SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know; to perceive) implies learning/teaching self by adapting to perceivable...consenting to suggested scientism tempts one to ignore self for others.
Understanding (suggested) represents the inversion of knowledge (perceivable) and ones submission to "stand under" another.
is wrong
a) one cannot suggest others what "is" without ignoring that everything perceivable "was" before any suggestion could be shaped within.
b) right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need). Nature isn't right or wrong...it was change before those within can reason against each other what's right or wrong.
disinformation
a) each suggested information tempts one to ignore all perceivable inspiration, hence ones consent to suggested information representing self imposed disinformation.
b) being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...others suggest IN-FORM-ATION (within form through action) as the inversion thereof.
c) IN-SPIRIT-ATION implies being within SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form to flow) of action. Adaptation implies reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion).
belief is false
To believe implies to consent to suggested information as "truth"; which allows others to contradict it as "false". Why? Because consenting to suggested implies holding onto it, which tempts one to ignore being within motion...motion represents the need to let go and the temptation to want to hold onto.
In short...nature doesn't communicate truth or false; it communicates momentum of motion aka change.
Partial odds (life) within even whole (inception towards death).
SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know; to perceive) implies learning/teaching self by adapting to perceivable...consenting to suggested scientism tempts one to ignore self for others.
Understanding (suggested) represents the inversion of knowledge (perceivable) and ones submission to "stand under" another.
a) one cannot suggest others what "is" without ignoring that everything perceivable "was" before any suggestion could be shaped within.
b) right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need). Nature isn't right or wrong...it was change before those within can reason against each other what's right or wrong.
a) each suggested information tempts one to ignore all perceivable inspiration, hence ones consent to suggested information representing self imposed disinformation.
b) being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...others suggest IN-FORM-ATION (within form through action) as the inversion thereof.
c) IN-SPIRIT-ATION implies being within SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form to flow) of action. Adaptation implies reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion).
To believe implies to consent to suggested information as "truth"; which allows others to contradict it as "false". Why? Because consenting to suggested implies holding onto it, which tempts one to ignore being within motion...motion represents the need to let go and the temptation to want to hold onto.
In short...nature doesn't communicate truth or false; it communicates momentum of motion aka change.