150k; 5,000 years; 8 billion...
Suggested numbers tempting one to ignore perceivable units (ones)
record
RE (response to) CORD (bound by twisting); hence scriptures like "the cords of the wicked are the snares with which they catch the unwary".
How does one respond? By "free" will of choice. What does consenting by "free" will of choice to being "bound by twisting" imply?
extermination
EX (response to) TERM (Latin terminus, a limit or boundary) ATION (action); hence choice (ex) responding to momentum (term) of motion (ation).
Extermination implies ones status quo of being; which others invert by suggesting it to mean the end of being.
extinct
Extinction is suggested as annihilation (reducing to non-existence) aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing). Being (partial) implies within everything (whole). Another suggested inversion.
tl; dr...ignoring self (singular) by joining others (pluralism) will destroy every group. A many are being tempted to destroy one another by joining; which in return permits a few chosen "ones" (singular) to remain apart at the center of a self destructive circumference, hence circumcision (cutting of surrounding to protect center).
somewhere between blue and purple.
Look into "Tekhelet" and "developments in the jewish community may also have played a role, such as the proliferation of counterfeit (indigo) threads which made the procurement of genuine tekhelet difficult"...
BOTH ways
a) if inception towards death represents ones way of life; then what's the other?
b) if energy represents one; then what's the other?
one man fighting alone
ALL(in)ONE implies ones struggle to sustain self...not fighting others.
sting operation
OP'ERATE (Latin operor; Heb. signifies to be strong, to prevail), hence ones strength to resist (prevail) being injected (stung) by the suggestions of others.
we are completely
Only within whole (oneness) can partials (ones) be collected (we). Collecting (plural) destroys being (singular), hence others suggesting collectivism (e pluribus unum aka out of many; one).
suggest one reality over another
Suggested (fiction) can only be layered within perceivable (reality) if one consents to ignore latter for former.
we end up with...a giant ball
"we" (suggested pluralism) implies "a giant ball" (suggested collectivism). One implies being set apart from one another...not as we within a giant ball.
the truth is, we don't know
KNOWLEDGE (that which one perceives) can be ignored for reasoning (truth vs lie) about suggested.
Others suggest THE-ism (the); Definitionism (is); pluralism (we) and nihilism (don't) to distract one from perceivable/knowledge.
confusion
ION (action) sets itself apart into reactions. Others suggest one to CON-FUSE (mix; mingle; melt; dissolve) as to make different partials indistinguishable from one another. Ones consent to the suggestion of another "fuses" one with the suggested.
tug of war
Ones consent (want or not want) towards suggested (-isms) keeps one within a conflict of reason (want versus not want); hence within a "tug of war". Whatever side one chooses; the opposite will pull one in.
to choose which one you want
Wanting or not wanting implies from the suggestions by another; while ignoring ones need to adapt to perceivable.
Being implies choice at the center of need (perceivable) + want (suggested) balance. Choosing want over need shapes imbalance aka conflicts of reason among other choices.
keep in reality
Reality (inception towards death) doesn't keep one (life)...it sets one in (inception) and pulls one out (death).
KEEP, - "to hold; to retain in one's power or possession; not to lose or part with"...motion implies loss (inception towards death) imparting growth (life).
Others suggest ego-ism to tempt one to hold onto "me, myself, and I", which in return shapes every other one into a YOU/jew.
bring reality into existence
Into from where? Ex-(pressing) within where? If one brings reality into; then that implies an outside bigger than reality? What if anything one can EX-(press) by suggestion to another simply represents fiction (suggestion) in ones ignorance of reality (perceivable)?
by participating
Being part-ial implies within whole...only within whole can there be partials thereof.
Picture on the left shows the outside
A suggestion tempting one into a conflict of reason (outside vs inside). Either side gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will for both sides.
You can see
Suggesting in the name of others, hence tempting one to ignore perceivable view (reality) for suggested shown (fiction).
Whoever....is, he is...
First suggesting "anyone without exception" (whoever); then contradicting it with what the suggesting one defines it as (is).
- DOPPEL (double; two) aka suggested collectivism.
- GANG (a going, journey, way, passage) aka suggested progressivism.
Being implies one partial (life) resisting whole way (inception towards death).
john fetterman
- JOHN (Latin Johannes; Greek Ioannes; Hebrew Yohanan) - "Jehovah has favored"
- FETTER (Old English fetor) - "chain or shackle by which a person or animal is bound; check; restrain"
Aka Jehovah has favored man to be chained; shackled; bound; checked; restrained...
From one's personal standpoint; subjectively rather than objectively.
a) inception towards death objectifies (solid) life; while subjecting (liquid) it.
b) suggested stand-point implies STAND (to stop; to halt; not to proceed) + POINT (end of sentence)...an inversion of ones processed life-sentence.
c) suggested personal (ones own) tempts one to ignore perceivable personal (by sound).
The person who made the statement is not convinced that what they were told is true or accurate.
a) true or accurate implies reasoning against false or inaccurate...a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested nihilism (not).
b) thanks to ones mind set to reason (conflict)...one responds to a "do not" suggestion with an "is not" suggestion aka circular logic (snake eating its own tail).
Utilize implication (if/then) upon suggested..."if doing nothing; then is nothing" and you can spot how nothing eats itself.
c) CONVINCE (Latin , to vanquish) from VAN'QUISH (Latin vinco, vincio, to bind) implies binding self by consent to suggestions by others, hence permitting others to utilize suggested information as a shackle for ones bound consent.
d) ask yourself...who made state of mind/memory aka state-ment? Can another make ones state of mind?
I personally do not believe
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies out of everything...ones consent to believe in suggested nihilism (not) tempts one to ignore that.
In short...person contradicts not; believing "not" contradicts "do not believe".
theory
THE'ORY aka THEA (a view) HORAN (to see) implies as perceived by one...not as suggested by other ones. If one consents to view what another shows, then one ignores seeing...
alien invasion
ALIEN; from Latin ALIUS (another)...ones consent to the suggestion of another represents ones "invite" for "invasion" by another (alien).
ufo
Solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) implies unidentified (not similar, but different) flying (fluid) objects (solid).
one world government
One world (whole) governs each ones (partial) ment (mind/memory)...unless willingly ignored for suggestions by other ones.
the “biggest” conspiracy is how we allow ourselves to be shaped and molded by the suggestions of others, when the only truth is our own perception and comprehension of the world around us
a) that which surrounds one moves; that which others suggest; one affixes within ones mind as "true" or "false" information. One "needs" to adapt to that which moves; while resisting "wanting" or "not wanting" to hold onto affixed.
b) perception is offered to everyone (big); suggestion requires consent by each one (small)...
is that approaching what you were getting at?
a) approach getting (inception towards death) tempts one to ignore sustaining what one got (life). "approach getting" represents suggested progressivism.
b) IS (Latin esse) aka ES'SENCE, noun (Latin essentia, esse, to be) -"that which constitutes the particular nature of a being or substance" implies a whole for each particular within aka an abstract to draw each essence from aka a permanent base for each substitute ingredient.
One cannot define what is (solid) without tempting each other to ignore what was (fluid). The temptation represents ones free will of choice to hold onto solid (information), while ignoring fluid (inspiration).
c) life gets death; until then life remains aka RE (responds to) MAIN (that which has most power in producing an effect)...life implies effect (re) within cause (main).
Allow me
ALL (perceivable) LOW (perception) aka PER (by) MITTO (send).
If you still think in true vs false; then consider that false can only be shaped within true, hence LOW+MITTO+PER+ALL aka "perception send by perceivable".
This one can discern if one resists consenting to suggested "allow" + "permission". Furthermore..."con-sent/d" implies send together, while send (mitto) by (per) implies each one apart from one another. Ones consent to suggestions by one another tempts together, hence an allowance/permission given to others (consent to suggested) while ignoring "perception send by perceivable".
dense
- DENSE - "close; compact; having its constituent parts closely united; applied to solids or fluids"
Nature diffuses (whole to partials)...those within manipulate density by luring partials together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka miscegenation; melting pot; multiculturalism; mass migration aka united states; united nations; european union; university; uniformity; unicode and so on.
Suggested constitution (connected together) tempts one to ignore being separated apart from "one" another within whole, entire (sound).
In short...fluid to solid (diffuse) or solid vs solid (dense)...it's ones free will of choice. The former implies drawing in inspiration, while the latter implies information warfare (reasoning).
Hey been a while buddy nice to see you (please consider adding c/manna to your hopper)
That's on me being too lazy to use anything besides the frontpage; while wondering where all the inspiring posters went...I even found myself responding with some 5k words to something on "IP2Always".
Anyway...spiritual nourishment (manna)? Always appreciated. Have a nice day.
a) CONSPIRE (Latin conspirare) - "to breathe together"...
b) that others can suggest "biggest", when perceivable implies bigger than anything suggested within.
ongoing inner dialogue
a) inner (life) implies temporary; outer (inception towards death) implies ongoing, hence outer (loss) sustaining inner (growth).
b) dialogue aka DI (division) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...inner reasoning over suggested words tempts one to ignore outer flow of perceivable sound.
found this out when a study was shared
a) your consent to that shared study established a foundation of suggested information within your mind/memory, which tempts you to ignore "found out" aka outside foundation of perceivable inspiration.
b) ones consent to suggested studies establish others as master (teacher) and self as slave (student), hence STUDY (to fix the mind closely upon a subject).
Mind/memory needs to adapt to fluid (inspiration), which requires one to resist the want to affix (information).
I do not usually say monologue because there's not just one, but multiple voices in my head
Mono refers to one-self; multiple voices in "ones" head implies as counted by one-self. Consider if it's same sound uttered in different voices, instead of "multiple" voices?
Each different voice responds to the same sound, yet most are falling for the temptation of what others are shaping with voice...words; definitions; idols; brands; letters; numbers; names; symbolism etc.
in my head arguing
Aka reasoning over suggested information aka conflict.
every choice and decision
a) EV'ERY (each individual of a whole collection or aggregate number)...it's ones individual choice which chooses to collect or aggregate suggested numbers. Try each (single) instead of every (plural)...
b) DECI'DE (to determine; to form a definite opinion; to come to a conclusion)...being alive implies in-between initiation (inception) and conclusion (death). Form (solid) implies within flow (fluid), hence not definite (affixed).
ego; angel; devil
- EGO... mind/memory filled with suggested information; tempting one to remain within self, while ignoring to adapt to outside
- ANGEL... ones angular perspective when horizontal (need/want) meets vertical (inception towards death) establishing ones choice to guard ones life, hence guardian angle/angel.
- DEVIL - Latin; to calumniate aka shirking of ones response-ability (choice) by blaming others for consequences.
defense mechanism
a) suggested mechanism tempts one to ignore natural employment for artificial work (Latin machina).
b) defense (life) within offense (inception towards death) implies resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
c) Nature offers (offense); resisting fertilizes ones resistance (defense)...others tempt one to get offended by consenting to their proposed offering (suggested information).
I am capable of having internal dialogue without ignoring external perceivable sound/inspiration.
a) CAPABLE (able to hold or contain)...perception cannot hold onto or contain perceivable inspiration, yet others can tempt one to hold onto and contain suggested information within ones mind/memory.
b) consider if you internally recreate perceivable inspiration (sound) with suggested information (words); hence reasoning over contradicting definitions for a system that already moved on, hence further contradicting whatever you hold onto?
c) internal implies different from external...do you use the same language for both? Try to use a secondary language internally and your primary language externally to regain control over your ego. Languages represent operating systems with a backdoor (suggested information) to others.
The trick...OPERATE (to produce by agency). Being implies regent (life) produced within agency (inception towards death), hence representing a regent SYSTEM (Latin systema; Gr. to set; assemblage of partials within whole).
In short...oneself represents system within operation; others suggest one to consent to hold onto operating systems (languages).
Dualism....black and white; good and evil; above and below; life and death; cold and heat; love and hate and so on.
Consenting to suggested dualism doesn't place one in-between this "and" that; but into a conflict of reason between this "versus" that.
two genders
One generator (inception towards death) for each one reactor (life) within...it's oneself that is being tricked to ignore self-discernment when counting other ones.
The entire point of freedom of speech—of speech in general—is to reach someone
a) REACH (Latin rego) - "to make straight"...being implies odds (life) within straight (inception towards death) while struggling to sustain self.
b) being alive implies sentenced from inception towards death...others suggest progressivism (points) to distract one from resisting origin.
c) fluid sound (entire) generates (general) solid instruments (partial)...others suggest affixed definitions (words) to distract one from that.
d) speech (suggested information) tempts one to ignore general sound (perceivable inspiration)...it's on oneself to resist want to hold onto suggested for need to let go of perceivable.
Think of the actual word “speech.” What is a speech? It’s a “formal address or discourse delivered to an audience.” Notice the key words here “delivered to an audience.”
a) form (life) is addressed by flow (inception towards death), hence each partial instrument (perception) being audience within whole sound (perceivable).
AUD'IENCE, noun - "hearing, or attending to sounds"...not consenting to the suggested words by others, which implies failing to attend perceivable sound.
b) perceivable sound implies actual; suggested words represent re-actual, hence being shaped within and in response to enacting sound.
c) what is speech? Ones consent to suggested spell-craft aka a LETTER (one who permits) aka an idol worshiper (upholding suggested within perceivable) aka one who consents to a death sentence, when permitting others to appoint definitions.
A speech without an audience is just a monologue delivered to yourself.
MONO (one) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...reasoning about suggested information (words) represents ones internal monologue aka ones ignorance of perceivable inspiration (sound).
a) suggesting others to be "bots" dehumanizes aka decreases human reaction.
b) stalled implies affixed...being (alive) implies within motion (inception towards death), hence one existing in-spirit-ation (within breathable action)...others suggest in-stall-ation as the inversion thereof.
c) How could energy (Greek work) not work?
to convey your thoughts so that proles can understand
a) consenting to the suggested label "prole" establishes "aristocrats".
b) understanding implies ones consent to "stand under" the suggestions by another, hence establishing oneself as prole standing under aristocrat.
c) CONVEY (to cause to pass, transmit)...inception towards death represents the cause to pass transmitted life. Others suggest one to convey suggested information; which tempts one to ignore that.
way of communication
Way (inception towards death) imparts (communicates) life...others suggest communication to mean putting definitions together by tempting the many to consent to the suggestions of the few.
Words represent miscommunication (spell-craft); tempting one to ignore way of communication aka sound (perceivable) towards each instrument (perception).
your way
You (life) cannot own way (inception towards death)...others suggest "owning" to tempt one to consent to demonic (dai-mon aka divider-provider) possession.
Possession is based on wanting to hold onto; while being is based on needing to let go...others tempt one to hold onto suggested information; which tempts one to ignore that perceivable inspiration needs to be let go.
how no celebrity...is saying a god damn word?
CELEBRATE - "to perform publicly with appropriate rites"...being alive implies ones exclusive (appropriate) rite of passage from inception towards death. Celebrating others disappropriates self.
What could those put on a pedestal by those willingly putting themselves into a pit say? Both climbing out of a pit and jumping down from a pedestal require ones response-ability (free will of choice), yet the pit/pedestal relationship is based on shirking response-ability onto each other.
Michelle may tuck it in; but doubtedly manage to fuck it off. Anyway...what did I wrote that offended you?
"currencies", it is not a currency at all
There's only one current (inception toward death) for each ones (life) eyes to see/sea...both suggested pluralism (currencies) and nihilism (not) tempt one to ignore that.
ability to transact
Action (inception towards death) transforms into reaction (life), hence enabling ones free will of choice.
Nephilim (fallen ones) implies ones (life) fall (inception towards death), which represents comedy (growth) within drama (loss), which others habitually exploit (to jest) with suggested tragedy (unhappy resolution) and melodrama (ode to death).
rite...I wonder what this "secret" is
Rite (life) of passage (inception towards death) implies division (Latin seco; to divide) aka sec-ret that's hidden from ones lacking self discernment...hidden as in; concealed by ones own ignorance.
Also ROYAL, from root REG - "to direct in a straight line" implies being (life) directed within a straight line (inception towards death)...unless ignored.
shriner
SHRINE (repository) aka ones mind/memory holding onto suggested information; while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
Also...SCRIN - "arc of the covenant" aka arc (beginning; origin) of the covenant (contract between one (consent) and another (suggestion)).
linking Freemasons to the occult
Ones consent "links" one to the suggestions by a "mason of free" (will of choice), which conceals (occult) perceivable (inspiration) behind the curtain of suggested (information). That curtain (Latin cortina) represents ones ignorance inclosing one from ones surrounding.
Why can everyone...see the exact same stars...
a) everyone implies each "different" one.
b) stars (plural) implies that one can discern between each "different" star (singular).
same direction around the same fixed central point
Same direction (inception towards death) around a different moving central sentence (life)...
- others suggest progressivism (point) to tempt one to ignore ones life sentence for suggested outcomes.
- others suggest definitionism (fixed) to tempt one to ignore being solid within momentum of fluid.
- others suggest identiarianism (same) to tempt one to ignore being different from one another.
looking in different directions
Different outlook (perception) within same direction (perceivable), hence not looking "in", but being "within"...
Question everything
Everything implies solution (inception towards death) for everyone (life) within...others tempt one with suggested questions (progressivism) and answers (definitionism) to ignore being dissolved within the moment(um) of motion...unless resisted.
an EXACT same pattern
a) others suggest PATTERN (to imitate; to follow) to distract one from RE (respond to) COGNITION (perceivable).
b) being implies different (growth) within same (loss) aka EX (expressed reaction) within ACT (impressing action).
Sleight of hand "exactamundo" (Fonzie from Happy Days or Simon Phoenix from Demolition Man etc.) aka ex-act-amount aka rise to reach aka accumulation of particulars, into an aggregate whole aka to compose particulars (life) within whole (inception towards death).
Suggested THE-ism implies ones consent to submit to the authority of another; which in return shapes the other as ones ELITE (selection; choice).
Ones consent (want or not want) to suggested, shapes a conflict of reason (want versus not want) within ones mind...others utilize suggestion to control both sides of every conflict one consents to wage against one another.
CLIMAX (culminate on meridian) implies at the center (life) of surrounding (inception towards death), hence nadir (inception) to meridian (life) to zenith (death)...not a point, but a sentence.
a) DEFEAT (overthrow; successful resistance)...resistance (life) cannot overthrow velocity (inception towards death) only growing self by resisting the temptation of velocity.
b) being implies FEATure (life) within main (inception towards death), hence main DE (separating) into FEAT (partial)