Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies out of everything...ones consent to believe in suggested nihilism (not) tempts one to ignore that.
In short...person contradicts not; believing "not" contradicts "do not believe".
theory
THE'ORY aka THEA (a view) HORAN (to see) implies as perceived by one...not as suggested by other ones. If one consents to view what another shows, then one ignores seeing...
From one's personal standpoint; subjectively rather than objectively.
a) inception towards death objectifies (solid) life; while subjecting (liquid) it.
b) suggested stand-point implies STAND (to stop; to halt; not to proceed) + POINT (end of sentence)...an inversion of ones processed life-sentence.
c) suggested personal (ones own) tempts one to ignore perceivable personal (by sound).
The person who made the statement is not convinced that what they were told is true or accurate.
a) true or accurate implies reasoning against false or inaccurate...a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested nihilism (not).
b) thanks to ones mind set to reason (conflict)...one responds to a "do not" suggestion with an "is not" suggestion aka circular logic (snake eating its own tail).
Utilize implication (if/then) upon suggested..."if doing nothing; then is nothing" and you can spot how nothing eats itself.
c) CONVINCE (Latin , to vanquish) from VAN'QUISH (Latin vinco, vincio, to bind) implies binding self by consent to suggestions by others, hence permitting others to utilize suggested information as a shackle for ones bound consent.
d) ask yourself...who made state of mind/memory aka state-ment? Can another make ones state of mind?
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies out of everything...ones consent to believe in suggested nihilism (not) tempts one to ignore that.
In short...person contradicts not; believing "not" contradicts "do not believe".
THE'ORY aka THEA (a view) HORAN (to see) implies as perceived by one...not as suggested by other ones. If one consents to view what another shows, then one ignores seeing...
Personally
do not believe
a) inception towards death objectifies (solid) life; while subjecting (liquid) it.
b) suggested stand-point implies STAND (to stop; to halt; not to proceed) + POINT (end of sentence)...an inversion of ones processed life-sentence.
c) suggested personal (ones own) tempts one to ignore perceivable personal (by sound).
a) true or accurate implies reasoning against false or inaccurate...a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested nihilism (not).
b) thanks to ones mind set to reason (conflict)...one responds to a "do not" suggestion with an "is not" suggestion aka circular logic (snake eating its own tail).
Utilize implication (if/then) upon suggested..."if doing nothing; then is nothing" and you can spot how nothing eats itself.
c) CONVINCE (Latin , to vanquish) from VAN'QUISH (Latin vinco, vincio, to bind) implies binding self by consent to suggestions by others, hence permitting others to utilize suggested information as a shackle for ones bound consent.
d) ask yourself...who made state of mind/memory aka state-ment? Can another make ones state of mind?
No shit, bot
Yeah no shit, shill. It's your alt account "free-will-of-choice" who actually is a bot that posts Latin schizo nonsense on every thread in this sub.
Why would I have anything to do with that ridiculous account, or be a shill? All I do is lurk