From one's personal standpoint; subjectively rather than objectively.
a) inception towards death objectifies (solid) life; while subjecting (liquid) it.
b) suggested stand-point implies STAND (to stop; to halt; not to proceed) + POINT (end of sentence)...an inversion of ones processed life-sentence.
c) suggested personal (ones own) tempts one to ignore perceivable personal (by sound).
The person who made the statement is not convinced that what they were told is true or accurate.
a) true or accurate implies reasoning against false or inaccurate...a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested nihilism (not).
b) thanks to ones mind set to reason (conflict)...one responds to a "do not" suggestion with an "is not" suggestion aka circular logic (snake eating its own tail).
Utilize implication (if/then) upon suggested..."if doing nothing; then is nothing" and you can spot how nothing eats itself.
c) CONVINCE (Latin , to vanquish) from VAN'QUISH (Latin vinco, vincio, to bind) implies binding self by consent to suggestions by others, hence permitting others to utilize suggested information as a shackle for ones bound consent.
d) ask yourself...who made state of mind/memory aka state-ment? Can another make ones state of mind?
a) inception towards death objectifies (solid) life; while subjecting (liquid) it.
b) suggested stand-point implies STAND (to stop; to halt; not to proceed) + POINT (end of sentence)...an inversion of ones processed life-sentence.
c) suggested personal (ones own) tempts one to ignore perceivable personal (by sound).
a) true or accurate implies reasoning against false or inaccurate...a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested nihilism (not).
b) thanks to ones mind set to reason (conflict)...one responds to a "do not" suggestion with an "is not" suggestion aka circular logic (snake eating its own tail).
Utilize implication (if/then) upon suggested..."if doing nothing; then is nothing" and you can spot how nothing eats itself.
c) CONVINCE (Latin , to vanquish) from VAN'QUISH (Latin vinco, vincio, to bind) implies binding self by consent to suggestions by others, hence permitting others to utilize suggested information as a shackle for ones bound consent.
d) ask yourself...who made state of mind/memory aka state-ment? Can another make ones state of mind?