ALL(in)ONE implies ones struggle to sustain self...not fighting others.
sting operation
OP'ERATE (Latin operor; Heb. signifies to be strong, to prevail), hence ones strength to resist (prevail) being injected (stung) by the suggestions of others.
we are completely
Only within whole (oneness) can partials (ones) be collected (we). Collecting (plural) destroys being (singular), hence others suggesting collectivism (e pluribus unum aka out of many; one).
suggest one reality over another
Suggested (fiction) can only be layered within perceivable (reality) if one consents to ignore latter for former.
we end up with...a giant ball
"we" (suggested pluralism) implies "a giant ball" (suggested collectivism). One implies being set apart from one another...not as we within a giant ball.
the truth is, we don't know
KNOWLEDGE (that which one perceives) can be ignored for reasoning (truth vs lie) about suggested.
Others suggest THE-ism (the); Definitionism (is); pluralism (we) and nihilism (don't) to distract one from perceivable/knowledge.
confusion
ION (action) sets itself apart into reactions. Others suggest one to CON-FUSE (mix; mingle; melt; dissolve) as to make different partials indistinguishable from one another. Ones consent to the suggestion of another "fuses" one with the suggested.
tug of war
Ones consent (want or not want) towards suggested (-isms) keeps one within a conflict of reason (want versus not want); hence within a "tug of war". Whatever side one chooses; the opposite will pull one in.
to choose which one you want
Wanting or not wanting implies from the suggestions by another; while ignoring ones need to adapt to perceivable.
Being implies choice at the center of need (perceivable) + want (suggested) balance. Choosing want over need shapes imbalance aka conflicts of reason among other choices.
keep in reality
Reality (inception towards death) doesn't keep one (life)...it sets one in (inception) and pulls one out (death).
KEEP, - "to hold; to retain in one's power or possession; not to lose or part with"...motion implies loss (inception towards death) imparting growth (life).
Others suggest ego-ism to tempt one to hold onto "me, myself, and I", which in return shapes every other one into a YOU/jew.
bring reality into existence
Into from where? Ex-(pressing) within where? If one brings reality into; then that implies an outside bigger than reality? What if anything one can EX-(press) by suggestion to another simply represents fiction (suggestion) in ones ignorance of reality (perceivable)?
by participating
Being part-ial implies within whole...only within whole can there be partials thereof.
a) if inception towards death represents ones way of life; then what's the other?
b) if energy represents one; then what's the other?
ALL(in)ONE implies ones struggle to sustain self...not fighting others.
OP'ERATE (Latin operor; Heb. signifies to be strong, to prevail), hence ones strength to resist (prevail) being injected (stung) by the suggestions of others.
Only within whole (oneness) can partials (ones) be collected (we). Collecting (plural) destroys being (singular), hence others suggesting collectivism (e pluribus unum aka out of many; one).
Suggested (fiction) can only be layered within perceivable (reality) if one consents to ignore latter for former.
"we" (suggested pluralism) implies "a giant ball" (suggested collectivism). One implies being set apart from one another...not as we within a giant ball.
KNOWLEDGE (that which one perceives) can be ignored for reasoning (truth vs lie) about suggested.
Others suggest THE-ism (the); Definitionism (is); pluralism (we) and nihilism (don't) to distract one from perceivable/knowledge.
ION (action) sets itself apart into reactions. Others suggest one to CON-FUSE (mix; mingle; melt; dissolve) as to make different partials indistinguishable from one another. Ones consent to the suggestion of another "fuses" one with the suggested.
Ones consent (want or not want) towards suggested (-isms) keeps one within a conflict of reason (want versus not want); hence within a "tug of war". Whatever side one chooses; the opposite will pull one in.
Wanting or not wanting implies from the suggestions by another; while ignoring ones need to adapt to perceivable.
Being implies choice at the center of need (perceivable) + want (suggested) balance. Choosing want over need shapes imbalance aka conflicts of reason among other choices.
Reality (inception towards death) doesn't keep one (life)...it sets one in (inception) and pulls one out (death).
KEEP, - "to hold; to retain in one's power or possession; not to lose or part with"...motion implies loss (inception towards death) imparting growth (life).
Others suggest ego-ism to tempt one to hold onto "me, myself, and I", which in return shapes every other one into a YOU/jew.
Into from where? Ex-(pressing) within where? If one brings reality into; then that implies an outside bigger than reality? What if anything one can EX-(press) by suggestion to another simply represents fiction (suggestion) in ones ignorance of reality (perceivable)?
Being part-ial implies within whole...only within whole can there be partials thereof.
That's kind of false narrative of "freedom of choice".
If you find yourself having to choose from some third-party made options, you have no any freedom for a long time, and probably never had.
Just don't play that stupid game.