the “biggest” conspiracy is how we allow ourselves to be shaped and molded by the suggestions of others, when the only truth is our own perception and comprehension of the world around us

a) that which surrounds one moves; that which others suggest; one affixes within ones mind as "true" or "false" information. One "needs" to adapt to that which moves; while resisting "wanting" or "not wanting" to hold onto affixed.

b) perception is offered to everyone (big); suggestion requires consent by each one (small)...

is that approaching what you were getting at?

a) approach getting (inception towards death) tempts one to ignore sustaining what one got (life). "approach getting" represents suggested progressivism.

b) IS (Latin esse) aka ES'SENCE, noun (Latin essentia, esse, to be) -"that which constitutes the particular nature of a being or substance" implies a whole for each particular within aka an abstract to draw each essence from aka a permanent base for each substitute ingredient.

One cannot define what is (solid) without tempting each other to ignore what was (fluid). The temptation represents ones free will of choice to hold onto solid (information), while ignoring fluid (inspiration).

c) life gets death; until then life remains aka RE (responds to) MAIN (that which has most power in producing an effect)...life implies effect (re) within cause (main).

Allow me

ALL (perceivable) LOW (perception) aka PER (by) MITTO (send).

If you still think in true vs false; then consider that false can only be shaped within true, hence LOW+MITTO+PER+ALL aka "perception send by perceivable".

This one can discern if one resists consenting to suggested "allow" + "permission". Furthermore..."con-sent/d" implies send together, while send (mitto) by (per) implies each one apart from one another. Ones consent to suggestions by one another tempts together, hence an allowance/permission given to others (consent to suggested) while ignoring "perception send by perceivable".

dense

• DENSE - "close; compact; having its constituent parts closely united; applied to solids or fluids"

Nature diffuses (whole to partials)...those within manipulate density by luring partials together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka miscegenation; melting pot; multiculturalism; mass migration aka united states; united nations; european union; university; uniformity; unicode and so on.

Suggested constitution (connected together) tempts one to ignore being separated apart from "one" another within whole, entire (sound).

In short...fluid to solid (diffuse) or solid vs solid (dense)...it's ones free will of choice. The former implies drawing in inspiration, while the latter implies information warfare (reasoning).

Hey been a while buddy nice to see you (please consider adding c/manna to your hopper)

That's on me being too lazy to use anything besides the frontpage; while wondering where all the inspiring posters went...I even found myself responding with some 5k words to something on "IP2Always".

Anyway...spiritual nourishment (manna)? Always appreciated. Have a nice day.