will not
Suggested nihilism (not) was willed (free will of choice) by ones consent to it.
AI mind control
Choosing to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested) permits those suggesting to control ones mind with the suggested information one willingly consents to uphold; believe in; follow along with etc.
Consent following suggestion; while ignoring to resist perception.
Do we keep publicly shaming these people...
The many are being tricked by a few to blame each other within a court of public opinion, while confining themselves privately when doing so. Each one monitored (in front of a monitor), while blaming others within a world wide web, isn't PUB'LIC, adjective - "open; notorious; exposed to all persons without restriction".
Celebrating human greed, and promoting it, instead of recognizing the mental illness that it is. (doing one for the self, over the group)
Consider the opposite...greed implies wanting from others; which tempts one to ignore needing to sustain self. Greed then tempts envy within others. Suggested group (collectivism) tempts one (singular) to ignore self for wanting to be part of others.
I learned they allow homosexuals to join.
HOMO (one and the same) SEX (Latin seco; to divide aka one apart from one another aka different)...homo contradicts sex IF one consents to the suggested joining of them.
In reality...one and the same (whole) divides itself into partials aka from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception). Others utilize suggested collectivism (joining together) to distract one from discerning self as partial within whole.
One by one, we were anointed with oil.
a) the birth-channel already anointed each one with oil.
b) OIL (aelan, to kindle, aeled, fire); hence baptism by fire.
sound and solemn
Aka sound (entire; whole) and sole (only one; partial).
Isis in her search for the body of OSIRIS
Isis (female momentum) in search for the body of osiris (male motion)...momentum seeks to reunify with motion, while each transformed part (life) within momentum (inception towards death) is SET apart from one another.
Edit: look at the amount of definitions for "set"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/set
Consider SET (god of foreigners; disorder; chaos) in regard to being chaos (life) within natural order (inception towards death).
remember hope
Remembering what was; while looking for hope towards what will be...confuses one now.
I don't
"I" implies one making a claim upon self..."don't" (doing nothing) contradicts that.
Do you?
If "you" and "I"; then differentiation through action. That implies a lot of doing...
did it even exist?
a) asking a question implies by choice (odd); which can only exist within balance (even).
b) "exist" aka EX (expression) IST (repression)...expression (life) can only exist within impressing (inception towards death). -ist (exist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (existentialism) aka ones submission to another aka ones repression of self; while ignoring to express self.
hope
Hope tempts one to want suggested outcomes; while ignoring need to adapt to perceivable origin...need/want implies enacting balance for ones reacting choice.
If one chooses to "want" hope; then one positions self against "not wanting" fear aka within a conflict of reason (hope vs fear). This conflict is controlled by those suggesting one what to hope/fear.
hall & oates
Daryl Hall; born Daryl Franklin Hohl...a musician fills a hall; hohl (German; hollow) contradicts that.
Consider hall & oats aka empty oaths...
a) Witchcraft...suggesting others to seek same position while comparing differences.
b) any deviation from an oath implies perjury...and then there's talmudic reasoning and the loophole mindset.
at least partly, an asshole
Unless...asswhole.
Using webbrain... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4N128esp.jpg
They are allied.
ALLY', verb (Latin ligo) - "to unite; to form a relation by similitude". Unit (Latin unus; one) implies ones apart from one another; not together.
free palestine
A self contradiction....PALESTINE (philistine; deficient in liberal culture), hence lacking LIBER (free).
Why have the jews managed to brainwash westerners so well?
a) You ended with a question, while starting with its answer...the collective. Ones consent to suggested the-ism permits others authority to collectivize all those who consented to west (westernism). Same trick with the (theism) jews (judaism)...
b) MAN'AGE, verb - "to conduct; to carry on; to direct the concerns of"...it's flow (inception towards death) which conducts; carries and directs the concerns of form (life). Ignoring this for suggestions by others; permits others to manage one.
we won't be fooled again
a) plural (we) tempts singular (one) to ignore self for others, hence shaping an us vs them conflict of reason.
b) won't implies vs will, hence tempting free "will" of choice to repress self with a conflict of reason against others.
c) being one implies apart from one another...not together (we).
d) one can only exist in-between sage/fool; otherwise one couldn't grow (sage) within loss (fool).
e) again aka against...hence one being tempted towards another; while ignoring origin (inception towards death) as self (life).
a grave mistake...
..for gentiles
because it creates a pressure group...
...of jews.
BLUE (a refracted color within a moving spectrum of light) + DOT (point or minute spot on a surface)...a moving spectrum implies a perceivable sentence, while a suggested point tempts one to consent to "end of sentence".
In short: others suggest dots; points; marks etc. to distract minute (ones perception) from surface (all perceivable)...ones consent "marks the spot".
what conspiracy means
a) CON (together; with) SPIRARE (to breathe).
b) being implies one apart from one another...others suggest togetherness (collectivism) as the inversion thereof. Why? To distract one with others from self; which permits a suggesting few to collectivize a consenting many.
c) mind/memory is fueled by impressing force aka inspiration aka IN (being within) SPIRIT (to breathe; react to origin) ATION (action; enacted upon).
Being implies reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion)...choosing to react to suggestions by others tempts one to ignore that, hence binding self aka adjure (to bind by oath) to another aka con-spire.
israels role in hamas
ISRA'EL (he that strives with god) + ROLE (part played by a person in life) + IN (being within) + HAMA (phonetic ham'-ah; at once).
Being implies partial within whole, hence each partial (life) striving within whole (inception towards death) at once (one time only aka now aka momentum of motion aka perceivable moment).
gaza
Aka Azzah (phonetic az-zaw; a philistine city) aka PHILISTINE (deficient in liberal culture) + CITY (center).
Liberal center implies ones free (Latin liber) will of choice at the center of balance, which others cultivate (domesticate) with suggested information. Those who resist following the suggested information by others represent "philistines", hence ones center of choice, not yet controlled by a chosen one.
a) TILE, noun (Latin tegula; tego, to cover)...generation implies revelation, hence revealing; not concealing. A gentile conceals self; when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
b) DIVINE adjective - "proceeding from" implies being (life) generated by (inception towards death), hence living within process of dying.
c) jew (phonetic you) implies oneself...unless ignored for suggestions by others.
d) suggested creationism (out of nothing) aka creatio ex nihilo tempts one to ignore transmutation of partial (perception) out of whole (perceivable) aka out of everything.
e) because implies caused (inception towards death) to be (life).
f) if game (inception towards death); then player (life)....a non-player ignores this for other players.
In other words: game (perceivable) - player (perception) - ignoring game (consent) for other player (suggestion).
a) chutzpah: "it was a grave mistake (for the gentiles)...because it creates a pressure group (of jews)"
b) implication (perceivable) or reason (suggested)...it's a choice.
INDEE'D, adverb (within and deed) - "in reality; in truth; in fact"...if one (life) exists within momentum (inception towards death) of motion, then wouldn't perceivable change contradict suggested truth/fact?
What if reality dissolves truth? What if a majority ignoring this can be effortlessly controlled by a minority with lies (contradiction of truth)?
but what is a peon?
a) one for others to "pee on".
b) peon as in a "serf held in servitude by his creditor until his debts are worked off" implies one who gives creed (faith; belief; consent by choice), while burdening self (debt) with the suggestions of another.
Anyone consenting to anything suggested represents a peon to a chosen one, hence a peon representing a pawn who pledges self to another.
c) peon as a "foot-soldier" implies as solid (life) being able to walk within liquid (inception towards death).
d) foundation of "what" implies energy (internal/inherent power); because what else could exist outside internal power but energy empowering it?
e) but (besides) implies a separation of whole into partials, which only then allows partial besides partial.
what are you while you're in the bathroom?
That's an odd question...are you CIA? aka R-U-SS-I-A
Ashke-nazis getting afraid that "you are a peon" (EU-R-O-PEAN) is waking up...
Terrorism being justified
Suggested terror (Latin terreo, to frighten) -ism tempts one to be afraid of outcomes; being implies within origin; just aka balance implies origin for being choice.
It has to go no matter the religion
If one consents to suggested religion (Latin religio; to bind anew); then one chooses to hold onto, which contradicts letting go of.
Playing (consenting to) the game (suggestions by others) keeps one within a conflict of reason aka wanting (winning) vs not wanting (losing).
A GAME (opposed to earnest) tempts one to ignore the need to resist wanted temptations, which in return positions one into opposition of temptation (want vs not want).
Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...earn (living) the urn (process of dying). Everything (perceivable) is offered to each one (perception)...more (growth) is demanded (loss).