Wish I could find a great legal analysis of this that I read, I'll summarize it:
Someone (assuming a lawyer) posted the quantity of fake bots were irrelevant and Musk must still buy twitter. Twitter SEC filings state that the estimated percent of fake bots is estimated at 5%; however, the actual percentage fake bots is unknown and may be much higher.
This language relating to the uncertainty of fake bots was available to Musk at time of purchase hence he has no legal recourse to back out of deal. The poster went on to state that if the fake bots is significantly higher than 5% then there may be an argument; however, it would be very difficult to get out of the deal based upon the language inserted in SEC filings.
If anyone has the link post it.
There were multiple turning points, but two in particular: Alex was on Joe Rogan's Podcast talking about Epstein and he simply said that Epstein worked for 'intelligence services'. Epstein was Jewish, Maxwell was Jewish...Maxwell's dad worked for Mossad...it's not really that difficult to piece together what 'intelligence services' Epstein was working for.
Another episode was when David Icke was on. Alex/David both danced around the Jewish issue and I lost much respect for both of them. It became apparent that they BOTH knew their boundaries and limitations as to what they were allowed to talk about.
David Duke is pretty good about addressing the Jewish question. He is also pretty sane and not an ultra white supremacist as his opponents would have you believe.
While I like a lot of what Alex says - he is controlled opposition. There is a clip of him admitting he is Jewish and also a clip of him admitting "some guy" in Israel made banned.video and gave it to Alex for free. ... Like some amateur guy in his mom's Israeli basement just made this multimillion dollar website and gave it to Alex for free.
He also will never admit who Epstein was working for, just that Epstein had ties to "intelligence organizations"
I will not blindly validate abortion in cases of rape or medical issues. As per my question, abortion violently dismembers a human being simply because of the sins of another human being. Abortion goes against the natural instinct of motherhood, and continuation of humanity, and as such it is evil.
That being said, abortion is an issue that highlights the pitfalls and errors of societal structure. I can think of few other questions that bring light to the problems of society structure than abortion.
Dumping Excess Money usury created? What excess money? There is no excess money - wars are financed through debt. Wars are complicated things that are seldom attributed to a single factor; instead there is often a multitude of factors.
In general, modern wars are attributed to two factors (1) Creation of debt. With every war debt is generated and as such the financial banks that run the world become stronger and stronger - slowly siphoning off the assets of the population to their coffers. (2) Wars for Israel. In general, modern wars are aimed to directly benefit Israel or to weaken all other nations so that Israel may further advance upon the world stage.
I think this is an interesting find and your attempt to brush it off as 'expected' is a mistake. First, I question if this image is legit. Assuming it is legit:
(1) The databases that feed the AI are carefully scrutinized to be 'main stream' narratives whereas all counter narratives are purged. (2) The question is 'How often does depopulation show up in conversations about covid in approved mainstream sources that the AI would be referencing' - i would assume this to be rare. (3) How often is heart disease discussed with death statistics? How about guns, obesity or famine?
I'm not arguing that the results are monumental or profound, but instead interesting.