A cover up and a pay off
Using free will of choice to pay...covers "free" will of choice under a payment aka debt.
jews in government today are the same
Only nature implies same; each being within implies difference. Gentiles are being tempted to respond alike which in return permits each jew to sustain apartheid.
A jew can only weave a cover to control the minds of gentiles if a gentile willingly accepts payment. It's this alike acceptance aka consensus, which mimics sameness and thereby feels like sameness to a gentile.
this story has circulated among the jews
a) Nature delineates being...a jew shapes stories to encircle gentiles mentally (logic) and physically (reason).
b) There's no "among the jews"...only each jew among (in the midst of) gentiles.
it (lust) certainly is one of the most powerful forces
Being implies choice; lust implies inclination. Choosing to incline tempts being off-center. That being said...most vs less implies inclination by choice.
knowledge was the one chosen to 'tempt'...
...tempt to be taken by given choice.
It happens as a cycle.
Happen implies "coming to pass by chance". Chance implies "taken by given choice".
What if choice was given during delineation, while taking a chance shapes a circle?
always inverting
There's only one way for each one within. Coming into being as one within all implies exterior (motion) delineating (momentum) interior (matter).
Interior holding onto exterior shapes a circle (vert) within (in) a line.
invert the meaning
Meaning implies "to measure". If one takes a measurement, then one inverts the measurable given. Notice that while alive...one cannot measure the length in-between ones inception and death.
cards
What's a card? A chart to navi (ship) gate (to move). What's a deck? A covering extending from side to side over part of a ship.
If motion (sea) > momentum (side to side) > matter (ship) then what does drawing a card from a deck imply for the navigator?
tarot
Instead of drawing cards from a deck...how about tarot/taraha (he rejected, put aside) or horah (he taught, showed) or torah (instruction)?
Tarot/torah...
The MASS of men lead lives of quiet desperation + MOST of the world is either asleep or dead
Nature doesn't amass (mass) or amount (most)...it fractions whole into partial.
The religious PEOPLE are, for the MOST part, asleep.
Religion aka religio (to bind anew) implies artificially binding together what nature sets free from one another. To enter religion requires ones free will of choice to join a chosen ones offer...thereby establishing the bondage.
not know
Not implies ones willing de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything known.
the instinctive pull of the transcendent. It’s an old observation.
a) Instinct implies within distinction from one another during transference, hence being (life) pushed (inception) and pulled (death) apart from one another.
b) Choosing to hold onto a side (old or new) during transference tempts one ob (towards) serve (servitude) to another.
The saints were the ones
The words "saints" and "ones" imply plurality...the implication of saint/sanctus (holy; whole) and one (one and only) implies singularity.
Few shape words to trick many into using them to lure each other's awareness to sleep by describing reality (sound) by artificial (words) means.
real historical
Real implies "response to all"; historical implies "storing within all"...storage burdens response.
Notice that history is shared from being to being...not delivered from nature to being. Few use the label "history" to describe BEFORE to many, which tricks many to ignore nature FORE(warding) BE(ing).
Before (fake) represents the inversion of forebe (real).
Even the stolen election feels like it was layers of total bullshit.
a) Thinking that political sides at odds with one another can be even...that's a con.
b) Thinking that what nature gives to being for free can be stolen from one another...that's a con.
c) Thinking elect (choice) can be shared by voting representatives...that's a con.
d) Thinking that diverse (life) within equal (inception towards death) can be made alike one another...that's a con.
e) Thinking that what nature delineates apart from one another can be layered upon one another...that's a con.
f) Thinking that whatever amount of bullshit can be layered into a totality...that's a con.
g) Thought shaped by the articulation of words within natural sound...that's a con.
long con
Length implies a measurement taken into possession, which tempts one to ignore process (inception towards death) giving potential (life).
We (created beings) are the ones, singular
WE and BEINGS implies plurality. WE aka plural of I, first person plural pronoun, "I and another or others".
unwhole
Un- "not" implies the negation of whole. Using the word "unwhole" blasphemes holiness. How could a partial negate whole other than by denial? Does a partial in denial negate whole or only self?
without wholeness
Whole implies out (outer cause) for partial within (inner effect). The synthetic word "without" tempts one to ignore analyzing out > with > in aka singular procession.
Nothing can't create something.
A sum of things can tempt one to denial being set apart within whole.
trying to be Holy means
Meaning implies holding onto aka defining as affixed to build a consensus among beings...that's a synthesis. Whole (holy) dividing (divining) partial implies an analysis.
Synthesis implies comfort (want); analysis implies trial (need)...there's a choice to be made in-between.
to be set apart as God
God remains whole (motion) while setting (momentum) apart (matter)...viewing God as apart implies God lacking parts.
Only within wholeness can apartheid come into being.
our Creator
How was "our" created? By partials choosing to join together. Our implies a sum of partials ignoring whole setting partials apart from one another.
Whole cannot create for whole implies the whole of what could be created. Whole can only transform (transfer form) partial. Creationism was implanted into partial to build sums aka to permit few the summoning together of many.
Creationism implies speculative masonry permitting few to shape the imagination of many by free will of choice.
God...is set apart
God WAS whole before partials within; set apart from one another, can suggest what IS.
sets us apart
US (uniting states together) contradicts apartheid (setting states apart).
we were made that way
Way implies singular motion...we implies plural of matter. If a singular being joins a plurality; then one loses ones way.
to be His
His implies possession...Him implies procession towards division (him/her) of being.
not to become Him
To become aka "coming towards being" implies His work...not aka "nihilo; nihilism" implies ones denial of His work.
to be within Him Who CREATED us and to be His, NOT to become Him.
It's ones consent to suggested creationism (creatio ex nihilo) which establishes nihilism (not).
If one lets go of creation, then nothing seizes to exist. Why? Because without creation there can be only transformation of everything into each thing.
Better to try to be Holy then, I think.
The trial implies ones struggle to sustain particularity among commonality...within whole.
Trying to be Holy implies trying to be God...that's satanism. Trying to make holy implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which establishes a commonality (gentiles) under a particularity (jew) aka slavery.
try to be
TO implies God; BE implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within God, which establishes the trial of sustenance.
Better...I think.
That implies circular confinement (better vs worse)...not a free mind thinking straight.
The other way...from holy (whole) towards partial aka cause setting effect into position.
They gave us first
First implies God given..."us" implies a synthesis inverting the God given analysis into a conflict aka thesis (us) vs antithesis (them).
See what happens when you go to the other extreme
Only choice can operate in-between extremes (balance)...choosing either puts both into conflict (imbalance) while corrupting ones sight.
What game are they playing there?
There can be only one...tempting given choice (reward) to take a chance (risk).
sound far fetched
Sound doesn't fetch...it releases. It's each instrument (mind structured within) which gets tempted to play fetch with one another.
Nature sets being free...a jew suggests artificial prices to tempt gentiles to sell self out by buying into anything, which shapes a gentile from alive into debt/dead.
Pay/pax - "peace; to pacify"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pay A gentile selling self out into dead (war) has to pay (peace) those alive.
The accumulating debt of dying gentiles gives peace to each living jew...that's how nature works balance upon choice.
There's a word that has gone out of fashion over time and that's "charlatan"
Charlatan/ciarlare - "to prate; babble" aka Mystery Babylon. Few tempt many to physically prate/babble as to fashion (make-up) a mental prison of their own design. Any suggested information held onto by consent...enslaves ones mind to prate and babble about it.
Sleight of hand...Charlemagne (charlatan); the king of the Franks (free, liberal, generous, outspoken).
there are always layers
Layer/lay - "cause to rest" tempts one to ignore that cause generates effect without rest. Few suggest affectation to distract many from cause, which lures effect to rest.
Effect implies being within cause; affect implies effect ignoring cause for one another...the latter establishes the layers under which ones resting mind slumbers. Few shape layers to tuck many into arrested development.
Artemis/arktos (to bear) + moon/me (to measure) aka bearing the burden of measurement taken, which in return tempts one to ignore mission/mittere (to release, let go; send, throw).
Nature releases being...others suggest measurements to bind a burden onto a being.
our country
a) Counting (country) permits another to hold one accountable. Nature sets each being free...not accountable to one another.
b) Possession (our) prevents potential from expressing oneself. Nature generating being implies procession generating potential.
Finance both sides
Finance/finis/fin (end) implies one side...it's ones consent to suggested finance which establishes the other side, while ending self by drowning in debt/dead.
The opposite of finance implies defund aka the division (life) of foundation (inception towards death) aka nature giving being "free" will of choice aka the beginning of each ones sight.
repeat forever
RE implies reaction; forever aka ever forwards implies action aka ever forwarding action (inception towards death) generating temporary reaction (life).
Living implies A GAIN...not repetition (again); but diversification (a gain).
Banking is about keeping...
-ing denotes action, which cannot be kept without shaping inaction. If being (life) implies within action (inception towards death); then keeping anything makes ones reaction inactive.
keeping people in debt
A person (singular) drowns if keeping a people (plural) together by joining.
debt
Debt implies dead...being alive implies rising (life) within a current (inception towards death). Keeping a currency in possession, while trying to rise within a current makes not drowning in debt/death exponentially harder.
War creates a lot of debt.
Few suggest creationism (something out of nothing) to sum many into a lot aka into a consensus called reason (peace vs war).
Few cast many into lots to make war.
Bankers love to finance wars.
a) Love versus hate implies the banks aka both sides of a moving currency, and it requires ones trust to enter a bank aka ones choice to incline towards a side.
b) Finance/finer - "to end, settle a dispute or debt" implies few tempting many to settle the end of their lives in disputes against each other while drowning in debt/dead.
c) Love vs hate implies rich vs poor...no matter which side of any suggested currency one chooses to keep.
VS aka verto (to turn) represents the bank keeping ones trust, while ignoring that nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life). The turning against one another represents an artificial decease of the mind called willing ignorance.
What if...were right all along?
All along implies all moving forwards while moving each one within along...there's no left vs right conflict (war) unless one chooses to ignore all along.
How quickly all that bullshit disappeared...
All (perceivable) moves each one (perception) within steadily along...few suggest bullshit to tempt many into an unsteady war (quickly vs slowly).
Within nature...quick and slow aren't in conflict against each other, but represent each beings choice to physically measure or to mentally hold onto a measurement. That which can be physically measured is based on nature moving it apart, while measurements held onto represent ones artificial ignorance of nature.
nature doesn't have banks
Nature implies a current (inception towards death) which tempts each being (life) within to incline towards a side.
fair...doesn't...either
These represent you the being choosing to bank one side over another aka fair vs unfair + does vs doesn't + either vs both. Others suggest the words "fair + doesn't + either" to tempt you to invest trust into banks by inclining your free will of choice towards a binding side.
Natural current implies linear progress; banking implies circular conflict.
- Loan/lehn/loikw - "to leave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/loan
Taking a loan implies taking a leave of absence aka denial of presence. Nature doesn't give loans...it advances "free" will of choice.
ot god and nt god are different entities
a) Entity implies each being within God. Only within God (motion) can flowing abstract (momentum) form entity (matter).
b) Old Testament versus New Testament implies a circular conflict among differences turning against one another, hence making them ALIKE one another. Old vs new implies the mutual destruction of different entities, and it's based on a test/teks (to weave) of ment (mind) aka few weaving the minds of many together into a conflict.
c) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
New implies the inversion of now, within which one old/al (to grow; nourish) aka God nourishing growth now....not before (old) or after (new). If one chooses new or old, then one ignores now aka living within k-NOW-ledge.
The Father of Jesus likes to sacrifice animals
a) "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9 Putting a THE (theos; god) before FATHER implies an imposter...
b) Sacrifice implies "offering"; animal implies "all animation" aka all offering animation through each animated one within. It's putting the labels "animal" and "sacrifice" upon one another which distracts from God.
c) Same (animation) generating difference (animated) implies sacrifice...LIKE implies a self sacrifice of being differentiated from one another by choosing to behave like one another.
God divines aka makes private (apart)...not common (alike).
Flow (inception towards death) destroys any form (life) structured within. Few use destruction to make many afraid by tempting them to hold onto structures...physically (idols) and mentally (ideals).
Whatever is being destroyed...nature works as always. Structures merely represent shapes formed within flow aka transitory existence.
Certain implies "affixed"...uniting states together tricks ones perception into certainty about a suggestion. Nature divides each state of being.
Shifting the "center of world trade" from west to east...requires eyes on the east to distract the west.