Thanks me! I was the only submission and I know this was already posted but I'm hoping for (edit: more) discussion.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASZf9HHcP/featured-documentary-submission-/c
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASZfDpgZt/am-i-a-documentary-on-ai-conscio/c
a) The con (together) scious (to perceive) mind holds onto an idea suggested by another. Doing so corrupts perception by suggestion.
b) Rule implies natural; others suggest artificial to tempt one to make a ruling. "Judge not lest ye be judged"...
Holding onto any definition obscures ones perception.
Measuring things thru one's perception implies discernment and is within the rules set before me.
But holding onto measurements and sharing it with others to establish a consensus contradicts self discernment...
The rule/reg (to move in a straight line)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule set through you cannot be held onto; only drawn within. Taking a measurement distracts ones mind from given line.
Try to explain this contradiction.
One singular is surrounded by plurality.
a) Only within singularity (cause) can each single unit (effect) come into being...after which plurality can be shaped by putting units together.
b) Sur (beyond) round (circular) implies tempting a being (be) at a distance (yond) aka from center into circumference aka into surrounding.
It's few who suggest SUR-realism to ROUND up many into mental (logic) and physical (reason) circles. Another example... DOLBY SURROUND to dull (dol) being (by) beyond (sur) center and into circumference (round).
c) Sound implies linear distribution of each instrument (mind structured within)...only within a line can a circle be shaped.
d) Counting others together (plural) corrupts ones self discernment (singular) while permitting another to hold one accountable.