This perspective doesn't estimate how important it is that this world is not a globe where humans evolved naturally to be the self governing Stuarts of our population. Anyway, it makes good points in a false reality, but that's like being the best documentary at the retard festival
I don't have resources to develop a theory. I just test the theory that this is a planet, and it's easy to see it's not. Flat and stationary is certain. What below or above is speculation
Ok then have at it on a post of your own. It seems you just keep chiming in on other's posts and theories to implant your own ideas, whether they are relevant or not..
Ya, trolling out of frustration that the world if full of arrogant programmed sheep. The harder I tried to wake people up the more lost I realized they are. It's well beyond hope, so I just vent, testing for echos to guage propensity of intelligent life. Probably check too often due to old screen addiction that lingers
Trolling and commenting walk a grey line. My comments are on topic, sometimes they lead to points that seems unconnected. I don't post about FE after clivemanuvers tried to make a rule against it last time I did. And FE is not a different subject than conspiracies, it's the mother of all of them. Anyway, it's not welcome here or anywhere, and that's because it's a problem that has really huge consequences.
So, if I bring up FE, it's for people who already know. Not trying to attack arguments from FE watch dogs.
The developing of a theory corrupts resource aka ones response (re) to rise (source)...DON'T represents such a theory aka a mental scheme corrupting a beings thought within the natural process.
The source of "don't" is based on not responding to source...
Flat and stationary is certain
What if certainty ignores process? What if being implies stationary potential (life) within moving procession (inception towards death). Notice that process implies a flat line, while potential implies any shape...
Are you certain that stationary (motionless) can exist outside of motion?
Stationary is absence of motion and everything is always in some form of motion. The ground we stand on ages, the sky above swirls and flows like the sea. But no curve means no planet means no orbit. Orbiting was the motion I was talking about which I am certain doesn't happen. Earth isn't orbiting or rotating, but things on it are always moving, sometimes just a little and very slowly.
Stationary is absence of motion and everything is always in some form of motion.
a) The ION in stat-ion-ary implies action aka motion...stat/sta - "to stand" implies a reaction aka choice balancing within motion.
b) If the word "everything" puts together a unitary (thing) and an aggregate of units (every); then what if that's an inversion of singularity (motion) dividing each unit (matter) within?
c) What if absence implies the sense of matter abstaining from motion by ignorance? And what if words like "stationary" + "everything" are designed to shape absence by tempting ignorance?
The ground we stand on ages, the sky above swirls and flows like the sea
a) We cannot stand...only a singular can wield the free will of choice to balance within motion. Standing together as a plural (we) makes finding balance within motion harder, because it confines free will of choice.
b) Flow cannot be "like" anything else...flow implies sameness differentiating form from one another. It's ignoring flow which allows form to shape likeness with one another.
If sea represents flow, then why can a sea find balance? A calm sea implies a formed choice within the balance of flowing motion. A sea reacts to being enacted upon...as does form within flow.
What if Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies flowing nature forming land; air, and water?
But no curve means no planet means no orbit
Both NO (nothing/nihilo aka nihilism and denial) + MEANING (to measure aka to hold onto a measure within mind) prevents potential (form) within procession (flow) to shape curves; planets; orbits etc. by free will of choice.
Flow doesn't form NO or MEANING...form shapes those by ignoring flow.
Orbiting was the motion I was talking about which I am certain doesn't happen
Nature moves being (choice) from > to (balance), which allows each being the free will of choice to shape ascertained happenstance like "orbiting motion".
You trying to ascertain what does or doesn't happen a) ignores the free will of choice given by linear motion, and b) confines your free will of choice within a circular motion aka reason (does vs doesn't).
Your reasoning against others (does vs doesn't), and your circular logic (does or doesn't) implies orbiting a certainty.
It doesn't matter if you choose round or flat, because choosing either side turns both sides against each other aka into orbital motion. Orbital because whatever you choose to hold onto within yourself (logic) turns into conflict outside yourself (reason).
Even if you manage to convince another to switch from round to flat...the conflict aka versus/verto - "to turn" continues the orbital motion.
things on it are always moving
Always implies WAY(s) OF ALL motion for each thing within. It's the addition of the "S" which tricks one to ignore singularity for plurality.
A thing cannot be "always"...only within all way can each thing come into being. The suggested word "always" shapes a plurality within the mind of each thing consenting to it.
Earth
Earth/erda/er - "ground; land"...only WITHIN nature can there be L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
sometimes just a little and very slowly.
That implies to behold aka a being holding onto measurements by summoning time. One needs to resist the want to hold onto...otherwise one perishes.
If everything moves, then motion cannot be some/sum - "quantity or amount"...motion implies singularity; some-times implies plurality.
For implies nature forwarding being...AI implies artifice shaped to distract being from forwarding nature. It's few who shape artifice to distract many from nature and into competition and control of each other.
Who goes into competition (war) with one another...few or many?
Who controls (just following orders) one another...few or many?
This perspective doesn't estimate how important it is that this world is not a globe where humans evolved naturally to be the self governing Stuarts of our population. Anyway, it makes good points in a false reality, but that's like being the best documentary at the retard festival
Feel free to post your own senarios of whatever shape or hologram you think we live on..
I don't have resources to develop a theory. I just test the theory that this is a planet, and it's easy to see it's not. Flat and stationary is certain. What below or above is speculation
Ok then have at it on a post of your own. It seems you just keep chiming in on other's posts and theories to implant your own ideas, whether they are relevant or not..
Ya, trolling out of frustration that the world if full of arrogant programmed sheep. The harder I tried to wake people up the more lost I realized they are. It's well beyond hope, so I just vent, testing for echos to guage propensity of intelligent life. Probably check too often due to old screen addiction that lingers
Ya, well trolling isn't welcome here. Present your theories respectfully and not attempted hijackingly.
Feel free to post a venting session if it'll help you, without violating the rules.
Trolling and commenting walk a grey line. My comments are on topic, sometimes they lead to points that seems unconnected. I don't post about FE after clivemanuvers tried to make a rule against it last time I did. And FE is not a different subject than conspiracies, it's the mother of all of them. Anyway, it's not welcome here or anywhere, and that's because it's a problem that has really huge consequences.
So, if I bring up FE, it's for people who already know. Not trying to attack arguments from FE watch dogs.
The developing of a theory corrupts resource aka ones response (re) to rise (source)...DON'T represents such a theory aka a mental scheme corrupting a beings thought within the natural process.
The source of "don't" is based on not responding to source...
What if certainty ignores process? What if being implies stationary potential (life) within moving procession (inception towards death). Notice that process implies a flat line, while potential implies any shape...
Are you certain that stationary (motionless) can exist outside of motion?
Stationary is absence of motion and everything is always in some form of motion. The ground we stand on ages, the sky above swirls and flows like the sea. But no curve means no planet means no orbit. Orbiting was the motion I was talking about which I am certain doesn't happen. Earth isn't orbiting or rotating, but things on it are always moving, sometimes just a little and very slowly.
a) The ION in stat-ion-ary implies action aka motion...stat/sta - "to stand" implies a reaction aka choice balancing within motion.
b) If the word "everything" puts together a unitary (thing) and an aggregate of units (every); then what if that's an inversion of singularity (motion) dividing each unit (matter) within?
c) What if absence implies the sense of matter abstaining from motion by ignorance? And what if words like "stationary" + "everything" are designed to shape absence by tempting ignorance?
a) We cannot stand...only a singular can wield the free will of choice to balance within motion. Standing together as a plural (we) makes finding balance within motion harder, because it confines free will of choice.
b) Flow cannot be "like" anything else...flow implies sameness differentiating form from one another. It's ignoring flow which allows form to shape likeness with one another.
If sea represents flow, then why can a sea find balance? A calm sea implies a formed choice within the balance of flowing motion. A sea reacts to being enacted upon...as does form within flow.
What if Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies flowing nature forming land; air, and water?
Both NO (nothing/nihilo aka nihilism and denial) + MEANING (to measure aka to hold onto a measure within mind) prevents potential (form) within procession (flow) to shape curves; planets; orbits etc. by free will of choice.
Flow doesn't form NO or MEANING...form shapes those by ignoring flow.
Nature moves being (choice) from > to (balance), which allows each being the free will of choice to shape ascertained happenstance like "orbiting motion".
You trying to ascertain what does or doesn't happen a) ignores the free will of choice given by linear motion, and b) confines your free will of choice within a circular motion aka reason (does vs doesn't).
Your reasoning against others (does vs doesn't), and your circular logic (does or doesn't) implies orbiting a certainty.
It doesn't matter if you choose round or flat, because choosing either side turns both sides against each other aka into orbital motion. Orbital because whatever you choose to hold onto within yourself (logic) turns into conflict outside yourself (reason).
Even if you manage to convince another to switch from round to flat...the conflict aka versus/verto - "to turn" continues the orbital motion.
Always implies WAY(s) OF ALL motion for each thing within. It's the addition of the "S" which tricks one to ignore singularity for plurality.
A thing cannot be "always"...only within all way can each thing come into being. The suggested word "always" shapes a plurality within the mind of each thing consenting to it.
Earth/erda/er - "ground; land"...only WITHIN nature can there be L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
That implies to behold aka a being holding onto measurements by summoning time. One needs to resist the want to hold onto...otherwise one perishes.
If everything moves, then motion cannot be some/sum - "quantity or amount"...motion implies singularity; some-times implies plurality.
If there's sometime; then where's the other time?
Sorry you don't understand
You vs me + do vs don't + standing under vs standing over implies a continues circle under the label "flat and stationary"...a contradiction.
It's holding onto any contradiction which fills one with sorrow (sorry)...
For implies nature forwarding being...AI implies artifice shaped to distract being from forwarding nature. It's few who shape artifice to distract many from nature and into competition and control of each other.
anarchists commies japs russkies chinks towelheads aids nukes aliens robots.