Stationary is absence of motion and everything is always in some form of motion.

a) The ION in stat-ion-ary implies action aka motion...stat/sta - "to stand" implies a reaction aka choice balancing within motion.

b) If the word "everything" puts together a unitary (thing) and an aggregate of units (every); then what if that's an inversion of singularity (motion) dividing each unit (matter) within?

c) What if absence implies the sense of matter abstaining from motion by ignorance? And what if words like "stationary" + "everything" are designed to shape absence by tempting ignorance?

The ground we stand on ages, the sky above swirls and flows like the sea

a) We cannot stand...only a singular can wield the free will of choice to balance within motion. Standing together as a plural (we) makes finding balance within motion harder, because it confines free will of choice.

b) Flow cannot be "like" anything else...flow implies sameness differentiating form from one another. It's ignoring flow which allows form to shape likeness with one another.

If sea represents flow, then why can a sea find balance? A calm sea implies a formed choice within the balance of flowing motion. A sea reacts to being enacted upon...as does form within flow.

What if Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies flowing nature forming land; air, and water?

But no curve means no planet means no orbit

Both NO (nothing/nihilo aka nihilism and denial) + MEANING (to measure aka to hold onto a measure within mind) prevents potential (form) within procession (flow) to shape curves; planets; orbits etc. by free will of choice.

Flow doesn't form NO or MEANING...form shapes those by ignoring flow.

Orbiting was the motion I was talking about which I am certain doesn't happen

Nature moves being (choice) from > to (balance), which allows each being the free will of choice to shape ascertained happenstance like "orbiting motion".

You trying to ascertain what does or doesn't happen a) ignores the free will of choice given by linear motion, and b) confines your free will of choice within a circular motion aka reason (does vs doesn't).

Your reasoning against others (does vs doesn't), and your circular logic (does or doesn't) implies orbiting a certainty.

It doesn't matter if you choose round or flat, because choosing either side turns both sides against each other aka into orbital motion. Orbital because whatever you choose to hold onto within yourself (logic) turns into conflict outside yourself (reason).

Even if you manage to convince another to switch from round to flat...the conflict aka versus/verto - "to turn" continues the orbital motion.

things on it are always moving

Always implies WAY(s) OF ALL motion for each thing within. It's the addition of the "S" which tricks one to ignore singularity for plurality.

A thing cannot be "always"...only within all way can each thing come into being. The suggested word "always" shapes a plurality within the mind of each thing consenting to it.

Earth

Earth/erda/er - "ground; land"...only WITHIN nature can there be L(and) A(ir) W(ater).

sometimes just a little and very slowly.

That implies to behold aka a being holding onto measurements by summoning time. One needs to resist the want to hold onto...otherwise one perishes.

If everything moves, then motion cannot be some/sum - "quantity or amount"...motion implies singularity; some-times implies plurality.

If there's sometime; then where's the other time?