So, there's this band that supposedly has existed since 2010s. It has some videos on Youtube. Some live recordings as well. A lot of comments there. It also has a homepage and Bandcamp page.
All seems well, except one small detail. I don't remember such band from that time. Hmm, strange...
Anyway, yesterday, while watching one of their live videos, I noticed a glitch and it struck me that I'm probably watching AI generated slop. Checked out some of their other videos and found some other glitches. Everything is very believable, bad sound quality, live singing, shaky camera and all that... except those small glitches.
In short, it's possible that this band doesn't exist. What's more, it probably has never existed. Could it be some kind of an experiment? Maybe they are testing whether they can pull such thing off?
Sure, I know there are a lot of fake things out there. What makes this one stand out, however, is its retroactivity. As if it already existed. In short, retroactive molding of our reality.
There's a dead internet theory. Which states that the internet is actually much, much emptier than it seems. That most of the internet is actually generated by bots and AI. What if they are trying to do the same with reality itself? Like, how many facts and events you have actually witnessed yourself in real life? How many you've just discovered and read about on the internet? The only way to be sure that something did in fact happen or existed before is to cross reference it in real life. Meet some people who actually do remember it being a thing. Or have witnessed it. Or participated in it.
What I'm talking here is manufacturing of events and facts which not only are fake, but which have never existed before their introduction into our info sphere. It's like inventing new Shakespeare who's not only fake, but who has never existed before. Not in 1500s, not in 1990s, not in 2000s.
Well, I don't know I'm correct on this or not, but it seemed like a scary thought. That they are aiming and soon might be able to fake not only current events, but the actual reality itself. It's a thin line between a simple fake and a retroactive one, but it's a significant one.
Taking a measurement (much) into possession (our) contradicts reality aka re (to respond) al (all) aka ones response (potential) to all (procession).
Fake requires ones responding choice to hold onto something (suggested) while ignoring that everything (perceivable) moves.
Look into The Beatles while ignoring the actors playing them for the designer... (((Theodor W. Adorno)))
Watching anything implies expression (ex) pressing forward (peri) mind (ment) aka the expression of others pressing forward ones mind, while the watcher represses self.
Sleight of hand through Madonna: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature".
To "know" implies the process of analysis (setting apart)...broadcasting a "lot" implies a synthesis (putting together).
Nature implies analysis; artifice implies synthesis.
Nature implies action; being implies reaction. Few suggest "retro" to tempt many to mentally hold onto, while ignoring physical action. Anything physically sold as retro tempts one to justify mentally retrogressing.
As for the use of retroactivity to rewrite the past...only within an ongoing line (inception towards death) can one (life) write. It's past and future which represent the fiction corrupting ones real presence.
A presence (life) cannot perceive past (inception) or future (death) while being transferred in-between...yet others can present a past to hold onto and a future to hope or fear for.
So is the world within which there can be only one...cause > effect implies singularity. Only within the same cause can each different effect come into being.
Reality implies singularity...plurality (they) implies fiction. THEY aren't trying...ONE fails the trial to discern self when viewing another one (singular) as they (plural).
a) Fact implies F(icticious)ACT...
b) To be a witness implies sacrificing self as a martyr for others... https://www.etymonline.com/word/witness
The opposite of witness implies participant (being) within whole (nature).
Aka fiction (witness) or reality (participant)...free will of choice.
Coming into being implies each ones introduction into all...never aka "nothing-everything" represents a suggested fiction tempting one to de-nial/nihilo (nothing) reality.