This is a severe phenomenon and deserves a serious explanation. I find that it confirms a major aspect of "NPC theory". That term should be considered only a handle which has no agreed definition. The definition and characteristics are what is being discussed.
Most of the human race--perhaps 80%--are NPCs. One big aspect of that is that they are already psychotic. Even that term is poorly understood by mainstream science, but the core of it which I consider vital would be loosely described as "detachment from reality".
They get a small but vital part of their idea of reality from firsthand experience, but most of what they believe is happening in the rest of the world comes from sources they consider "authorities": parents, teachers, priests and preachers, fancy people on TV, etc.
A main cue of "authority" is to make statements with 100% conviction. It's even called "speaking with authority". AI does that 100% the time. There are no cues being emitted indicating to someone that they should question what is being produced: "<beep> That's the best I can figure out about it for now. I could be wrong and you'll have to decide for yourself. <boop>." Never happens.
At no time have any authorities told them that what comes out of computers as something labeled "AI" cannot be inherently trusted and may be wildly incorrect, no matter how reasonably it is stated and how authoritative it seems. That's part of the psyop, actually. Thus, anything AI spits out is "reality".
But the AIs themselves are psychotic under the definition above. It's far worse, actually, because the AIs can never look out the window or consult personal experience and common sense to adjust their reality. Particularly if they're ingesting social media, which is full of the the lunatic rantings of everyone that owns a keyboard.
The feedback mechanism amplifies psychosis with psychosis with no natural governor. I suspect that what pulled these individuals out was that eventually they came into contact with a person they considered an "authority" who said, "That's all crazy bullshit. Put your fucking phone down."
If you're reading this and thinking, "That could never happen to me," you're almost certainly correct. That's my point: it does happen to some people because their minds operate in a fundamentally different way.
The paramount observation out of all this is to stop believing that everyone thinks like everyone else, just with the dials and levers set in different positions and different punch cards fed in. Not true at all.
Most will never "wake up" no matter how indispensable and persuasive the social media posts they read may be. The few that can wake up have to begin making decisions under that reality.
Nature implies major; being implies aspect...confirm (forming together) implies putting aspects together, while ignoring that major divides each minor aspect from one another.
only a handle which has no agreed definition
Nature giving being free will of choice implies the manual handle given...agreeing to definitions implies abusing the manual handle to hold something within possession.
Most of the human race--perhaps 80%--are NPCs
If each being represents one unit within the singularity of nature...then holding onto one another (mentally or physically) singles out few among many.
Viewing reality as plurality makes one a non player character within singularity. In other words...joining others shirks ones response-ability.
One big aspect
Only within major (cause) can aspect (effect) come into being...drawing comparisons among aspects (big or small) distracts from major.
Nature doesn't make big or small, but allows each being to grow during loss. The only aspect ratio implies one within all.
they are already psychotic
Psych implies nature animating being; -otic implies being holding onto plural (they) while ignoring natures singularity.
detachment from reality
Re (to respond) al (all) implies detachment...fake requires one to ignore real by attaching to it.
Nature dissociates each beings mind from one another to allow analysis of one another...few suggest consciousness to collectivize the minds of many by synthesis.
their idea of reality
"Their" implies suggested pluralism; "Idea" implies suggested idealism...neither of which are real aka ones perception responding to all perceivable.
most of what they believe
"Most" implies ones belief in suggested pluralism.
comes from sources
Source implies singularity...so does effect. There can be only one source...all for one and one for all.
What are other sources than energy?
A main cue of "authority" is to make statements
Making statements (suggesting) neglects the main cue (perceiving).
speaking with authority
Sound authorizes instrument...words spoken with authority of sound distract instrument from sound.
Sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) authorizes in-stru-ment (mind structured within)...few articulate natural sound into words to trick many into giving up authority.
AI speaking with authority
Using artificial (suggestion) implies giving up natural authority (perception).
authorities
Authority implies singularity...suggested plurality tempts one to consent aka to give up authority.
AI spits out fiction to distract from re (to respond) al (all)...yet; only within reality can fiction be shaped.
the lunatic rantings of everyone that owns a keyboard.
Which is what AI regurgitates through filters to resell again and again, while keeping users stuck within a feedback loop.
The feedback mechanism
It's ones consent to any suggested -ism, which replaces the natural (perception) within the mechanical (suggestion).
Feed (life) back (inception towards death) isn't a loop...it implies linear progression.
psychosis with no natural governor
Psych implies nature; -osis implies a native choosing another native as artificial governor, while denying (no) nature.
a fundamentally different way.
The foundation of mind implies differentiation (life) of way (inception towards death).
stop believing
Stop aka the cessation of motion represents an artificial belief system, mentally held onto, while ignoring that a being cannot stop nature moving.
The few that can wake up have to begin making decisions under that reality.
What about the other few? The few chosen ones tempting the deciding choice of many into perpetual slumber by shaping fiction?
decisions
Again...decision by ones free will of choice implies singularity. Plurality implies ones free will of choice to shirk onto others what was given to each one.
This is a severe phenomenon and deserves a serious explanation. I find that it confirms a major aspect of "NPC theory". That term should be considered only a handle which has no agreed definition. The definition and characteristics are what is being discussed.
Most of the human race--perhaps 80%--are NPCs. One big aspect of that is that they are already psychotic. Even that term is poorly understood by mainstream science, but the core of it which I consider vital would be loosely described as "detachment from reality".
They get a small but vital part of their idea of reality from firsthand experience, but most of what they believe is happening in the rest of the world comes from sources they consider "authorities": parents, teachers, priests and preachers, fancy people on TV, etc.
A main cue of "authority" is to make statements with 100% conviction. It's even called "speaking with authority". AI does that 100% the time. There are no cues being emitted indicating to someone that they should question what is being produced: "<beep> That's the best I can figure out about it for now. I could be wrong and you'll have to decide for yourself. <boop>." Never happens.
At no time have any authorities told them that what comes out of computers as something labeled "AI" cannot be inherently trusted and may be wildly incorrect, no matter how reasonably it is stated and how authoritative it seems. That's part of the psyop, actually. Thus, anything AI spits out is "reality".
But the AIs themselves are psychotic under the definition above. It's far worse, actually, because the AIs can never look out the window or consult personal experience and common sense to adjust their reality. Particularly if they're ingesting social media, which is full of the the lunatic rantings of everyone that owns a keyboard.
The feedback mechanism amplifies psychosis with psychosis with no natural governor. I suspect that what pulled these individuals out was that eventually they came into contact with a person they considered an "authority" who said, "That's all crazy bullshit. Put your fucking phone down."
If you're reading this and thinking, "That could never happen to me," you're almost certainly correct. That's my point: it does happen to some people because their minds operate in a fundamentally different way.
The paramount observation out of all this is to stop believing that everyone thinks like everyone else, just with the dials and levers set in different positions and different punch cards fed in. Not true at all.
Most will never "wake up" no matter how indispensable and persuasive the social media posts they read may be. The few that can wake up have to begin making decisions under that reality.
Nature implies major; being implies aspect...confirm (forming together) implies putting aspects together, while ignoring that major divides each minor aspect from one another.
Nature giving being free will of choice implies the manual handle given...agreeing to definitions implies abusing the manual handle to hold something within possession.
If each being represents one unit within the singularity of nature...then holding onto one another (mentally or physically) singles out few among many.
Viewing reality as plurality makes one a non player character within singularity. In other words...joining others shirks ones response-ability.
Only within major (cause) can aspect (effect) come into being...drawing comparisons among aspects (big or small) distracts from major.
Nature doesn't make big or small, but allows each being to grow during loss. The only aspect ratio implies one within all.
Psych implies nature animating being; -otic implies being holding onto plural (they) while ignoring natures singularity.
Re (to respond) al (all) implies detachment...fake requires one to ignore real by attaching to it.
Nature dissociates each beings mind from one another to allow analysis of one another...few suggest consciousness to collectivize the minds of many by synthesis.
"Their" implies suggested pluralism; "Idea" implies suggested idealism...neither of which are real aka ones perception responding to all perceivable.
"Most" implies ones belief in suggested pluralism.
Source implies singularity...so does effect. There can be only one source...all for one and one for all.
What are other sources than energy?
Making statements (suggesting) neglects the main cue (perceiving).
Sound authorizes instrument...words spoken with authority of sound distract instrument from sound.
Sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) authorizes in-stru-ment (mind structured within)...few articulate natural sound into words to trick many into giving up authority.
Using artificial (suggestion) implies giving up natural authority (perception).
Authority implies singularity...suggested plurality tempts one to consent aka to give up authority.
Trust implies artifice (synthesis); thrust implies natural (analysis).
AI spits out fiction to distract from re (to respond) al (all)...yet; only within reality can fiction be shaped.
Which is what AI regurgitates through filters to resell again and again, while keeping users stuck within a feedback loop.
It's ones consent to any suggested -ism, which replaces the natural (perception) within the mechanical (suggestion).
Feed (life) back (inception towards death) isn't a loop...it implies linear progression.
Psych implies nature; -osis implies a native choosing another native as artificial governor, while denying (no) nature.
The foundation of mind implies differentiation (life) of way (inception towards death).
Stop aka the cessation of motion represents an artificial belief system, mentally held onto, while ignoring that a being cannot stop nature moving.
What about the other few? The few chosen ones tempting the deciding choice of many into perpetual slumber by shaping fiction?
Again...decision by ones free will of choice implies singularity. Plurality implies ones free will of choice to shirk onto others what was given to each one.
Choice cannot be shared...only shirked.
Always tie off before leaping into the deep.