The end of life isn't the end of current...currency (suggested) within current (perceivable) tempts one to ignore that. As life goes back to origin (over the edge aka knowledge); all suggested currency accumulated goes with perceivable current down the drain.
Also...FI'AT (Latin fio) - "let it be done; a decree; a command to do something" aka spoken (suggested) into existence (perceivable). DECREE, noun (Latin to judge; to divide) implies both inception to life and life to death....which one ignores when consenting to any suggested decree (fiat).
Let it be done implies being (oneself) letting (consenting) it (suggested) done, hence all according to letter...
The kosher hexagon... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3RpmgANk.jpg
An offense to people like me; who love their country and all people REGARDLESS of their race; gender; sexual preference or background.
Thereby disregarding all the offenses previously mentioned, and of course the vid is 3:30 (33) long...
space force commander
Aka commandeering (ordering; directing) the forcing (driving/rushing) of space (spatium; spatior; to wander) aka migration.
to see in every thread...retard
The former implies increased velocity of motion; while retardation implies diminished velocity of motion. Few suggest words like "retard" to tempt many to ignore being (life) within motion (inception towards death).
annoying to see...nonsense
Seeing implies sensing...suggested nihilism (non) tempts one to deny senses.
annoying to see
ANNOY', verb (Latin neceo, to hurt + neco; to kill). Consider the sun...choosing to focus on it hurts and kills one, which doesn't make the sun annoying; it implies ones response-ability (free will of choice).
If resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) chooses to focus; then it fans the flame of life. In other words...focusing on light establishes refraction and reflection.
spouting off
Spouting implies spot; mockery of others...does contradicting ignorance mock others, even if others choose to ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested)?
It
a) Suggested dehumanization
b) Does the TRANSmutation of male (he) and female (she) imply an "it"?
pkvi
Ayh doubt that...
a) If vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) is being overloaded...it sinks faster.
b) Inception towards death implies a digestive system for the life within...others suggest constipation to distract from that aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together).
we take into account unified language and quantum computing
Unified language and quantum computing were suggested by few aka the ACCOUNT (a registry of a debt or credit) holders of all those who gave creed/belief/faith/consent aka those who pay into the account of others.
You pretty able to create new things without any language or external influence at all.
a) Can you show me anything "created new" without being shaped within; out of, and in response to perceivable reality?
b) Consider being (perception) enabled (perception) before being able to shape suggestions towards others.
obsessed with all that technological progress
Aka wanting to possess artificial progress, hence following it along, while ignoring that natural progress (inception towards death) needs one (life) to resist.
problem solving
Being implies problems (life) within solution (inception towards death).
how to fix
Aka how to tempt others to hold onto suggested (affixed), while ignoring perceivable (moving).
growing technological potential
Aka growing techno (artifice) and logic (reason/conflict) through the potential of suggestion.
...for some reason didn't turn to scientific approach in further development of his theory, and limit himself only to popularisation of it.
Aka suggesting others to solve (inception towards death) problems (life), while living his life apart from those killing each other. Popularization implies mass suggestion aka mediating information towards consent aka media propaganda machine developing theories within the minds of those consenting.
a problem should be formulated in a way where all umimportant things are cut out.
Aka erect center; cut off circumference...circumcision. What did he do? Limit himself (center) to popularization of theory towards others (circumference). How many millions of "unimportant things" where cut off from living during the USSR?
Yet; 2024 and a "crazy russian" suggests the importance of Genrih Altshuller (of jewish origin), hence making this one a "chosen one".
divide problem into tiniest possible parts and began to combine anything known to find solution.
a) Combining anything known implies tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka fixing by mixing.
b) Meanwhile in perceivable reality...solution (inception towards death) divides into problems (life) aka whole dividing into the "tiniest possible parts" aka into each ONE, and being one implies apart from one another.
Why do you think its called a "combine harvester"?
trillions combinations
a) What if tri-lion was already combined? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_England
b) What if -ation (action) divides into reactions?
c) If action implies motion produced, then what does combining action imply? More motion? Can there be more motion than fundamental velocity (inception towards death) for each resisting matter (life) within?
Sleight of hand: "terminal velocity". What if velocity implies boundary (terminal) for resistance within? What's the opposite of terminal? Healthy; reviving; life-giving...
dumb artificial...being kind of obsessed with all that technological
TECHNOL'OGY, noun (Gr. art, and word or discourse) - "a description of arts; or a treatise on the arts" aka artificial (suggested) over natural (perceivable)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Technology
a) One is free to shape perceivable sound...consenting to suggested words confines one to those suggesting them, while permitting others control over it.
b) Love vs hate implies reasoning over suggested, which implies ones consent was already given, as in...consenting to suggested information implies "informed consent".
c) Shut up aka to hinder ingress (shut) + confinement (up)...that implies hindering ingress of suggested information, which when consented to, confines ones mind to it.
The more one "shuts up"; the more one opens (life) within down (inception towards death).
d) The only term; terminus (boundary) for growth (life) implies loss (inception towards death). Perceivable term moves; suggested terms tempt one to hold onto a definition; definite; affixed, hence contradicting motion.
As in different than most others who choose to behave alike? Because sameness (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...even if most ignore this for behaving alike; according to norm; in adherence to mainstream; lockstep within party-line; following leaders etc.
One passage (inception towards death) aka a DO'OR (doer; one who does; agent; action)...each one within (life) implies a key; fastener aka within whole (sound) each partial implies a key-note.
Others making suggestions imply gate-keepers, and ones consent opens these gates to the underworld (vault of under-standing) aka gates of hell etc.
four cardinal directions
Fundamental (cardinal) direction implies from inception towards death, hence not FOUR, but FORwards...one letter (one who lets) is all it takes to trick U/you/jew...
climate conspiracy theorist
That implies a suggested label aka CODICIL, noun - "a writing by way of supplement to a will". Others reasoning (he did vs he didn't start fires) among each other implies their willing consent to a suggested label (climate conspiracy theorist).
Perceivable implies base of ones perceiving mind...anything suggested implies a supplement aka SUP'PLE, adjective - "pliant; flexible; easily bent; yielding; compliant; not obstinate".
Obstinacy implies "not yielding to reason" which makes implication so much more inspiring for self...
theoretical "perfect" candidate for high office
a) Candidate (one who offers himself)...nature offers all perceivable towards each ones perception within.
b) Nature offers praxis (action) towards theory (thea; practice aka reaction)...that's how each one can practice all.
c) Perfect (perficio, to carry to the end)...Nature carries each life within from inception towards death. Seeking perfection as partial within an hollistic system implies lack of self discernment.
d) Life being moved from inception towards death implies from heat towards cold, hence inception of life implying coming to be OFF-ICE...
e) Consenting to the suggestions of others; in this case voting representatives, implies submitting self to another, hence putting self lower than whoever one set up high. In other words...if others seem to be in higher positions; then oneself is crawling at their feet willingly.
If one keeps holding onto suggested; then it keeps "crawling in my skin; these wounds, they will not heal; fear is how I fall; confusing what is real"... https://genius.com/Linkin-park-crawling-lyrics
Nobody is perfectly aligned with what you believe
a) Each body (life) is perfectly aligned (inception towards death).
b) To believe implies ones consent to a conflict of reason (belief vs disbelief) against others.
c) Body implies "frame of animation"...suggested "no; not; nothing; nothingness; nihilo; nihilism; denial" tempts one to ignore animation as the foundation of being, hence framework aka frame (body) work (energy).
I propose a thought experiment.
a) Only nature proposes ment aka pro (forwards) pose (position) ment (memory). Forwards implies motion; memory of motion implies momentum, and position within momentum of motion implies matter.
b) If one consents to your proposition (suggestion), then ex (outwards) per (by) ment (mind/memory) is being ignored for repression of self for depression by another.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
historical figures
If he-brew his-story to make jew fall for it, then it doesn't matter with what figure; figo; fix (also fictum; fiction) one plays, while ignoring reality.
Sleight of hand..."action-figure" aka figure (affixed) contradicting action (motion).
creation of Serpentor
a) If snakes exist; then both Cobra and Serpent-or are transmuted out of already perceivable...not a creation out of nothing.
b) Ser (to protect) Pent (kept in, confined) Tor (hill; mound)
I'll start: Mix...
a) Off-spring implies being set apart from one another.
b) Order (inception towards death) generates problems (life)...others suggest "There's not a problem that I can't fix; Cause I can do it in the mix" for fixing the world by bringing together (tikkun olam).
https://genius.com/Indeep-last-night-a-dj-saved-my-life-lyrics
to get people to believe a literal unit of nothing could be worth something.
a) Believing doesn't corrupt value (perceivable), but ones evaluation (perception) with a fictitious worth (suggested).
b) Nothing aka Latin nihilo implies both suggested nihilism and ones consent to denial perceivable for it.
In other words...to believe suggested (nothing) implies ones denial of perceivable (everything).
c) It ain't about getting people; it's about tempting people to get suggested, which never leaves control of those suggesting it.
Example...money. Few suggest money; many think they get money; yet they always get got good with interest.
Now we have a whole naive generation
a) Neither can any being be "whole" (only a partial within whole); nor can being be "generation" only being (life) generated (inception towards death).
It's ones consent to theses suggested labels which tempts one to ignore self discernment (partial being) within origin (whole generation).
b) Naive implies native - "produced by nature; original; born with the being; natural; not acquired".
Suggestion implies immigration into ones native perception. Only expatriating suggested information allows native growth of comprehension through perceivable inspiration.
Informed consent implies ones consent to suggested information by others, which establishes mass migration of fiction into ones mind/memory.
market psychology
Psyche (animating power aka perceivable) + Logy (reasoning about suggested)...without buying (consent) into selling (suggested) aka a market, one wouldn't have anything to reason about.
to own nothing
a) If everything (perceivable) is offered to every one (perception); then one can only own nothing (suggested).
b) Being (life) implies leased (inception towards death) by reality.
paying for game
Game implies "prey hunted" aka GA (collect) MANN (man; person)...players are the price.
astrological knowledge
Consenting to logic (suggested) tempts one to ignore astro (perceivable). The former tempts one to understand (stand under another); while latter positions one at the center of known ledge aka as perception within perceivable.
Consider LEDGE, noun - "a prominent part; a regular part rising or projecting beyond the rest"...know thyself.
to gather credibility
Suggestions tempt others to consent; to believe; to have faith; to creed/credit...very easy to gather that which is willingly given.
Goetia has old roots
a) Invocation aka in-voca-tion implies being voice within action...choosing to react to the suggested voices by others permits them to utilize invocations like spell-craft (suggested words over perceivable sound).
b) Suggested young (before) and old (after) tempts one to ignore perceivable being (now)...a seed exists now as above (tree) so below (roots). Young buds from old stems.
We should account for the differential in interpretation
a) Suggested pluralism (we) tempts ignorance of self (one), hence ignoring perceivable differences for suggested sameness.
b) If one counts other ones, then an account (a registry of a debt or credit) is opened up.
c) Each ones perception implies "differential" within same perceivable source....interpretation through another (suggestion) implies ones lack of self discernment.
Nature doesn't require interpretation...it "was" perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it "is".
programmed to see magic
a) Secret operation of natural cause (magic) implies divided (Latin seco; secret) effect (ones perception) within natural cause (all perceivable). Self discernment reveals that...
b) Programma (to write) implies ones life sentence from start (inception) to finish (death)....suggested writing tempts one with spell-craft (words over sound); abc (abecadary; abracadabra) and grammar (grimoire) to put an end to ones life sentence, hence "pointing out" suggested, as the inversion of being within perceivable sentence.
Different definitions
Suggested definitions aka definite (affixed) tion (action) tempts one to ignore that action (perceivable) differentiates reactions (perception) through motion.
Consenting to suggested words makes one a deaf phonetician (definition) aka one deaf to phonics (perceivable sound).
Add steganography to the mix
a) Only during dissolve (inception towards death) can there be resolve (life) aka compound (loss) transmuting components (growth) within itself...mixing components (substance) tempts ignorance of compound (essence).
b) The art of writing in ciphers (steganography) tempts one to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing (cipher; denoting nothing) aka 1 (natural being) for 0 (artificial nihilo).
Cipher aka nothing aka nihilo implies both suggested nihilism by others and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for it.
demonic books
Ignoring demon aka dai (divider) mon (provider) aka being divided (perception) while provided (perceivable) tempts one to bind self to the suggestions by others.
One cannot read without focusing sight in-between a suggested cover. Nature offers ones sight the position of center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable), hence eyes to see; ears to hear etc.
Sleights of hand:
And an alleged master astronomer compared to the likes of Tycho Brahe...
If you're told about something over and over and over, can it possibly be considered "occult"?
Informed consent implies ones consent to suggested information...increasing frequency of suggested, not only exponentially burdens the consenting one, it also divides (secret; occult) one from perceivable.
In short: oculus (perception) or occult (suggestion)...it's ones free will of choice.
it's about the researchers and podcasters and posters who tell us about these things over and over
Those who consent to suggested researchers and podcasters are responding to search, while being caste pods aka molded vessels searching for input from others aka golems. And guess who supplies the siphon (tube)? jew (you)!
the real Elites
Elite (selection; choice) within reality implies each ones free will of choice...suggested the-ism tempts one to choose others, hence establishing chosen ones as ones selected choice (elite).
arrange...under the surface
Arrangement aka arrange (to dispose parts of a whole in the manner intended) ment (mind/memory) with suggested information, which tempts one to ignore surface aka sur (beyond) face (visible) aka perceivable beyond ones perception.
As for under...consenting to suggested positions one under another, hence "understanding".
all "occultism" is shiny made-up nonsense
Suggested -ism occults (conceals) perceiving senses...if consented to.
- Me: "I have a box"
- You: "Okay"
That's all it takes (your consent to my suggestion) to conceal (occult) what is or isn't in the box I have or haven't. Your consenting mind/memory becomes the box for my suggestions, and I wield your permission aka informed consent to put whatever the fuck I want in and out of there.
peaceful country
If it's full of pieces (peaceful), then it implies each ONE PIECE...counting (country) implies collectivism, hence establishing con-fusion (war) among pieces (peace).
Spoiler Alert: The end of ONE PIECE will be about finding oneself during the journey with others...just follow the pone (phonic, sound, entire) glyph (tear apart; partials) along the grand line (inception towards death). There cannot be a bigger treasure (value) than oneself (evaluation)...
Whole dividing into partials implies STRAW (to spread) HEAD (person)...
blood sacrifice
Sacrifice aka Sacred - "made holy by association with divine" aka holy/whole (inception towards death) associating (reuniting) divine/divided (life)...that implies each ones rite of blood sacrifice.
Satan's chosen
Satan, from root s-t-n - "one who opposes" implies ones free will of choice...personifying suggested "satan" tempts one to ignore self for idolizing another.
Being implies advanced (inception towards death) opposition (life)...hence needing to resist wanted temptations.
all about
a) Suggested aboutism tempts one to ignore all perceivable.
b) About aka a-b-out aka "I be outside"...tempts one to ignore being (life) inside (inception towards death), hence within (choice) sides (balance).
- BO'RED - "made hollow"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bored
Nature moves everything perceivable through each ones perception...ignoring this for each others suggestions implies "emptiness inside".
- Venom; from root wen - "to desire, strive for"
a) Perceivable implies as offered by nature, while suggested tempts one to desire and strive for something others suggest...the former is always available, while the latter tempts one to ignore that for something else; artificial; fictitious...venomous.
b) Venom implies each ones choice of want (temptation) over need (resistance); hence everything within reality can be venomous if one consents to the suggestion thereof.
c) Reasoning implies want vs not want aka temptation (want) vs temptation (not want); while ignoring resistance (need). It's circular logic, while grinding down resistance aka eating itself (ourobouros). Notice also that ouroboros contains robor/robur - "strength" at the center...
in short
Aka "to put it short"...through the lens of perception this implies to put it (inception towards death) short (life), which is what life needs to resist. From the lens of suggested it tempts life to shorten things instead of expressing/lengthening self.
This is just one more example on how fundamental deception operates.
tl; dr: Reason (imbalance) implies venom; implication (balance) implies antidote...if one so chooses.
How could one sense "non"?
a) One needs to carry self...wanting others to convey tempts one to ignore that.
b) Nature conveys everything perceivable through each ones perception....reasoning (little vs much) over suggestions by one another distracts from that.
c) "never" implies Nothing-EVERything...a contradiction in terms.
Nation implies NATIVE (produced by nature; born with the being) TION (action). Action implies nature; reactions implies natives within nature.
Being needs to adapt to nature (perception); while resisting other natives (suggestion). Ignoring this establishes "argumentum in circulo" aka conflicts of reason such as black vs white; nationalism vs socialism; sub vs dom etc.
Native implies set apart within nature; social implies natives together within nature. Ones consent to either suggested -ism (nationalism and socialism) implies holding together, while ignoring to be apart.