• Representation of jewish demographics in those statistics... 0%
• Chutzpah of establishing a white vs black conflict; while painting the participants as red vs blue... 66,6%

Winning implies gambling towards suggested outcome; being implies in response to perceivable origin, hence breathing...

either...or

• Either implies "one of two"...being implies one (partial) within oneness (whole).
• Or implies origin...how could there be more than one origin?

disrupt

Flow (inception towards death) cannot be disrupted; only form (life) can be broken apart further or put together with other form.

salary

Salary/Sal implies salt, and each one (matter) gets salt by male (motion) and oil through female (momentum).

to go away, not be saved

What if the way is ongoing? What if saving can only be temporal? Where does electricity go away to? Does magnetic represent a saving state? Can energy go away?

AI Demands to Be Worshipped

a) Suggested artifice requires ones consent for affect. Demand implies suggested offer.

b) Consenting to a suggested demand...devalues self. Why? Because only nature offers; and any artifice was shaped within it.

research into the disease's cause

a) To be implies effect within cause. Ignoring perceivable cause for suggested effects puts one at dis-ease.

b) Research aka responding to search for outcomes, while ignoring to be within origin.

alzheimer

Aka ALL (al) IS (z) HOME (heim)...to each one within.

fumbling in the dark

To be implies as ray (matter) with visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion)...matter implies both physical shadow to each other, and mental shadow within self if ignoring to discern origin of light.

One fumbles for things to hold onto...light cannot be held onto; it goes through one, while enlightening the obscurity held within self. Directing ones enlightenment establishes a path among the obscurities suggested by others.

a) Only ones consent can establish discord with another. Others suggest reason to tempt ones consenting mind to carry along discord within self.

b) DIS (set apart) CORD (twist together)...it's ones consent which permits others to twist suggestions together.

c) CHAT (chatter; talk idly, babble) ZILLA/CECIL/CAECUS (blind)...babbling suggested keeps one blind within perceivable.

you're crazy or boring.

If one views others as crazy or boring; then one ignores balanced natural order exciting one to adapt.

In other words...passing judgement (you're crazy or boring) upon others tempts one to ignore being within justice aka that which JUST (balance) IS (essence).

I use "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore their free will of choice...and yet they keep trying to idolize the one using choice; instead of ones choice made.

How could free will of choice ever be crazy or boring...unless one chooses it to be?

breaks into bohemian grove

Bohemian implies a gybsy aka a vagabond...if one enters a grove without vagabonds in it; then it isn't a bohemian grove anymore.

ritualistic alter

Ritual/rite implies a rite of passage from/to, while alter implies alternation (to make different in some particular)...being implies alternation (life) within rite of passage (inception towards death).

Ritualistic alters are suggested to trick others to ignore that alternation and ones rite of passage is perceivable.

From the Christian perspective...consenting to suggestion over perception implies ignoring creator for created. And how are Christians deceived into ignoring this? By suggested creationism over perceivable transformation/transmutation.

a) Illumination doesn't obfuscate. Light implies motion; it's the shade of matter which obfuscates those who ignore light.

b) Meaning implies something affixed (suggested information)...being implies within everything moving (perceivable inspiration). Ones consent to hold onto suggested information permits others to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will.

c) Schizophrenia aka Eugene Bleuler and Sigismund Freud conspiring to conquer psychiatry, and underneath that...schizo/schism (divide), which is what ones consent to any suggest -ism establishes within self and against others.

d) Why is it that I can imply from what is written; while you reason over who's writing it?

Let's take another example from your quotes: "war of the sexes"...SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...can a division (male/female) exist without conflict/war/reason?

If male and female are divided from each other; then why does FE(minine)MALE imply being within each other?

e) Account implies "a registry of a debt or credit". If I didn't make an offer...

• About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) Comment Score (11418)

...then where did I gave creed/credit or took on debt upon self?

f) DELIBERATE, verb "to balance in the mind" tempts one to ignore that only nature (motion) generates balance (momentum) for ones choice (matter) within.

Others suggest reason (conflict aka imbalance) as balance in the mind to trick ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.

tl; dr...can one just be within without others trying to label being from outside?

reverting to the mindset of clan and clade.

Both CLAN (body of persons closely united by some common interest or pursuit) and CLADE (group of organisms evolved from a common ancestor) invert nature (setting apart) with artifice (putting together).

The mind of many is set to follow few. The reverting (revisionism) already took place. Natural directs; artificial turns...if one consents to ignore former for latter.

Holistic genetic interest is a feminine concern

a) Holistic (whole) implies generation aka motion (male) to momentum (fe-male) and to matter (trans-form).

b) Concern aka CON (together; with) CERN (to perceive) implies ones ignorance of perception (apart) for suggestion (together). Taking the con out; allows one to dis-cern self.

jewish insularity is masculine

Motion (masculine) to momentum (feminine) for insulated off-spring by trans-formation of matter. Life (form) implies insulated in-between inception and death (flow).

the internet intended and designed as a tool of control

a) World Wide Web implies a web woven together to unite any thing flexible aka flexibility of user expression united under abusers suppression.

b) Internet implies internal net, hence ensnaring users inside (suggestion) and away from outside (perception).

c) Suggested online tempts one to ignore being within (life) line (inception towards death). If ones life is on the line; then one needs to resist; while being "on-line" implies progressing onward, while ignoring to resist.

the internet is a product of US military agencies

Aka DARPA/ARPA-net; established within US Department of Defense under Eisenhauer aka EISEN (steel, stalin) HAUER (hitter; hitler). Furthermore; department of defense implies defending the departed minds of few by uniting the minds of many.

The main agenda...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkum olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka united states; united nations; united kingdom; european union; university; uniformity; unisex; unicode; unicef; unilever; universal studios; universal pictures; universal basic income etc, aka collectivism aka multiculturalism; miscegenation; mongrelism; mass migration; melting pot; eugenics/disgenics and so on.

free flow of information

Being implies as free will of choice within the flow of inspiration...others suggest information, which when consented to...

• ...tempts one to ignore inspiration for information.
• ...permits chosen ones to control ones choice by suggested information.
• ...permits others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) suggested information at their free will of choice.
• ... tempts one to go with the flow (inception towards death) instead of being the resisting form (life) within.

In short: suggested information tempts one to hold onto it; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto. Holding onto implies putting together; being implies apart (form) within whole (flow).

just another con from the get go

COM/CON implies "with, together"...being implies apart from one another.

• https://www.etymonline.com/word/com-#etymonline_v_15853
• https://www.etymonline.com/word/con-#etymonline_v_17294

Is the internet any different?

a) Each user is different...consenting to suggested internet by few tempts many to respond "alike" aka destroying diversity (life) through equality (inception towards death).

b) Each different screen implies the same "allegory of the cave"... https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg

It doesn't matter what is shown on any screen; only that one consents to look at suggested (fiction), which in return reduces ones sight within perceivable (reality).

more and more oppressive

Consenting to suggested implies repression of self, while permitting suppression by others. Whatever suggested information ones consenting mind/memory takes on, becomes oppressive to self; because one carries more and more inFORMation around. InSPIRation implies spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) aka impression (inhale) for expression (exhale). One cannot carry around inspiration, hence others tempting one to burden self with endless information.

Consider the difference between RAM (temporary storage) and HARD-DRIVE (ongoing storage)...the former is utilize for adaption to input (perceivable inspiration), while the latter tempts accumulation of input (suggested information).

Could it be that that was its design from the very beginning?

Being implies in-between beginning (inception) and end (death)...viewing suggested "internet" as a beginning tempts one to ignore origin of being. Others suggest "internal net" to distract those inside from exterior.

The corruption in this world ain't about what others give one (suggestion); but what oneself takes (consent). As soon as one takes; one gives self away to others aka as soon as one buys, one sells self out to others. Whatever others are offering for selling only tempts one to sell self out by buying into it.

• For centuries, Russia has had her own troubles with the Jews and, as the world knows, has at last fallen prostrate before the Jewish power which for centuries has been working to UNDERMINE her. Even Disraeli was not blinded to the fact that Jews had a control over Russia which the rest of the world never knew.

• The biggest hoax in modern times was the propaganda against Russia as the persecutor of the Jews. Russia devoted to the Jews a large part of the most favored section of the land, and was always so lax in those laws which prohibited Jews from settling in other parts of the country that the Jew was able to create an UNDERGROUND system throughout the whole of Russia which controlled the grain trade, controlled public opinion and utterly baffled the czar's government.

~Henry Ford "The International Jew"

• You may say that the goyim will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a maneuver of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail—the undergrounds, metropolitans, those subterranean corridors- which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organizations and archives.

~Protocol Nr.9

the sheer scope of the effort is massive

Consider the opposite...could a few tempt the masses to reduce their scope of discernment by ignorance? Could it be that masses following few takes less effort; than oneself resisting to be part of masses?

Where is the EF'FORT, noun (Latin fortis; force) of gentiles?

The foundation of a chosen one (elect) implies ones choice (select). Ones consent to suggested authority; elections or officials permits others control over suggested.

OFFICE implies (particular duty) aka ones particular duty (perception) within whole work (perceivable)...not to the suggestions by one another.

if they can print; why can't we?

PRINT, verb (Latin imprimo; pressing forward)...being implies expression (life) within impression (inception towards death). Others suggest printing to tempt one to press forwards instead of resisting (temporary growth) velocity (ongoing loss).

Suggested currency tempts one to ignore perceivable current...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter forces one to let go of. Suggested information tempts one to hold onto it within memory, while perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, hence it being a moving process going through ones mind/memory.

mass noncompliance

a) This aggregation/collectivization/amassing of others implies tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together). It is the foundation for a few to remain apart within a many.

b) There exists no noncompliance within nature...action (inception towards death) forces reaction (life). Few suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt many to de-nial natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).

Without ones denial; one can discern for self the implication of COMPLIANCE, noun - "wish, desire, yielding; concession; submission" aka ones free will of choice of want (suggested by another) over need (perceived as self).

starts with individual

Matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) doesn't imply division into TWO (dual); but internal separation of one (whole) into ones (partials).

Other ones (chosen ones) suggest dualism to tempt one to ignore self.

to fix...power

Power implies "faculty of moving or of producing a change"...to fix implies ones choice to ignore power.

to remove the positions of centralized power

To be implies center (life) of power (inception towards death); hence responding (re) to being moved (move).

sectors of society

Sector (Latin seco; to divide) contradicts society (to put together). Few suggest society-ism (socialism) to aggregate many together; while the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) sets apart (life).

That's why many are desperately trying to hold together fiction; while reality rips everything apart, which in return benefits only those who suggest fiction to distract others from perceivable reality.

don’t have any way of exploiting us with the power.

Coming to be (life) implies within power of way (inception towards death). It's the gentiles who ignore the power of way for whatever jews are suggesting, which in return gives few the opportunity to exploit the power of way, while being empowered by gentile consent.

Suggested biology (life + logic) inverts perceivable biozoo (life + animation)...logic implies conflict (reason) against other life; animation implies separation of living matter within from one another.

Fail implies "to cease to be abundant for supply"...nature implies infinite supply; being within implies finite demand. The happy merchant inverted this by suggesting finite supply as to tempt infinite demand among buyers.

• TERROR (Latin terreo, to frighten)

Others suggest TERROR-ism; consent shapes one into a TERROR-ist.

In other words...jews suggest gentiles to be afraid (strife; war; death; pestilence...horror movies); gentiles getting afraid are then labeled terrorists, hence justifying the "war on terror".

War btw implies reasoning over suggested, and the conflict of reason established through suggested terrorism implies HOPE VS FEAR. Both sides consent to suggested, perpetuate the conflict of reason against each other and permit jews control over both sides, while being outside of it.

beat

BEAT; verb - "to lessen; to diminish; to moderate" aka BEing (life) EATen (inception towards death). Growth can only exist within loss; there can only be amplification during diminution, and ones free will of choice can only exist within moderation aka at the center of a balance based system.

trumpet

Aka the instrument in-between impression and expression, which is where the free will of choice exist to shape impressing sound into expressed resonance (need) or dissonance (want).

One who...like a...

Being one implies different from one another...unless choosing to respond alike to each other. Others suggest alike to destroy perceivable differences aka "equality through diversity".

Definition - De-fining by breaking into small parts/points

Missing the foundation...TION (action/motion). Motion continues, while generating momentum, within which matter comes to be as temporary growth (partial) during ongoing loss (whole).

Latin frango, fregi; Hebrew - "to break; to free; to deliver, to separate" aka whole breaking into partials; balance (momentum) setting choice free (matter); father (motion) impregnating mother (momentum) to deliver trans-formed child (matter); separation of loss (action) and growth (reaction).

Causing will, free or not

Not implies ones free will of choice to de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) perceivable cause (balance) as perceiving effect (choice) for whatever others are suggesting.

to cherry pick according to preferred perception

a) Picking the cherry implies from top; preferring suggested information implies from bottom, hence submitting ones consent to suggestion by another.

b) Accord implies agreement; which again implies ones free will of choice to want (agree) or not want (disagree) suggested; while ignoring/denying perceivable need.

Nature aka motion/action doesn't require agreement or disagreement...it forces all perceivable input through each ones perceiving ment/mind/memory.

The flow of perceivable inspiration forces itself through ones memory, even if one ignores it by holding onto suggested information. This holding onto implies the cherry picking by preference and the sleight of hand for those with eyes to see goes like this: "the cake is a lie"...suggestion is the fake cake others utilize to tempt ones consent to cherry pick from.

2Eyes

There can be only one...for all is one in energy. It's each one eye; separated from one another. Eye also implies "I" aka the one who claims self as "me; myself or I", which in return shapes all other ones into "YOU" (phonetic jew).

Two implies suggested dualism, which one consents to by counting other ones as two; three; four etc. All numbers and names are suggested to distract one from discerning that nature (oneness) designates units (ones) by setting itself apart, which only then allows self discernment of each different partial within same whole/sole/soul.

And here's a sleight of hand for that... https://genius.com/Sam-and-dave-soul-man-lyrics

Sustainability Initiatives... https://img.gvid.tv/img/3Nvsf2EC.jpg

Unless you are rolling your own code

Few suggest all names and numbers to many...coding implies putting suggested names and numbers together, while ignoring where they came from.

Nature sets perceivable (whole) and perception (partial) apart from one another aka a DE-CODEING.

it's safe to assume everything is compromised

If one consents to a suggested code; then one ignores that everything perceivable implies a decoding. Ones ignorance is the crucial part of encoding (suggested information) the decoding (perceivable inspiration).

chief growth officer at...holdings

Notice that holding onto anything diminishes ones resistance. What if resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) implies growth?

Identity

Nature designates units (ones different from one another); those within tempt with artificial identities (ones behaving the same as others) to ignore nature.

identities converge seamlessly

CONVERGE, verb - "to tend to one point"...hence tempting each different life sentence to the same point of death.

SEAM, noun - "the suture or uniting of two edges"...nature sets each ones perception apart from perceivable knowlEDGE.

Here's the sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics