a) Illumination doesn't obfuscate. Light implies motion; it's the shade of matter which obfuscates those who ignore light.
b) Meaning implies something affixed (suggested information)...being implies within everything moving (perceivable inspiration). Ones consent to hold onto suggested information permits others to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will.
c) Schizophrenia aka Eugene Bleuler and Sigismund Freud conspiring to conquer psychiatry, and underneath that...schizo/schism (divide), which is what ones consent to any suggest -ism establishes within self and against others.
d) Why is it that I can imply from what is written; while you reason over who's writing it?
Let's take another example from your quotes: "war of the sexes"...SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...can a division (male/female) exist without conflict/war/reason?
If male and female are divided from each other; then why does FE(minine)MALE imply being within each other?
e) Account implies "a registry of a debt or credit". If I didn't make an offer...
About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) Comment Score (11418)
...then where did I gave creed/credit or took on debt upon self?
f) DELIBERATE, verb "to balance in the mind" tempts one to ignore that only nature (motion) generates balance (momentum) for ones choice (matter) within.
Others suggest reason (conflict aka imbalance) as balance in the mind to trick ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
tl; dr...can one just be within without others trying to label being from outside?
If one views others as crazy or boring; then one ignores balanced natural order exciting one to adapt.
In other words...passing judgement (you're crazy or boring) upon others tempts one to ignore being within justice aka that which JUST (balance) IS (essence).
I use "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore their free will of choice...and yet they keep trying to idolize the one using choice; instead of ones choice made.
How could free will of choice ever be crazy or boring...unless one chooses it to be?
a) Illumination doesn't obfuscate. Light implies motion; it's the shade of matter which obfuscates those who ignore light.
b) Meaning implies something affixed (suggested information)...being implies within everything moving (perceivable inspiration). Ones consent to hold onto suggested information permits others to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will.
c) Schizophrenia aka Eugene Bleuler and Sigismund Freud conspiring to conquer psychiatry, and underneath that...schizo/schism (divide), which is what ones consent to any suggest -ism establishes within self and against others.
d) Why is it that I can imply from what is written; while you reason over who's writing it?
Let's take another example from your quotes: "war of the sexes"...SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...can a division (male/female) exist without conflict/war/reason?
If male and female are divided from each other; then why does FE(minine)MALE imply being within each other?
e) Account implies "a registry of a debt or credit". If I didn't make an offer...
...then where did I gave creed/credit or took on debt upon self?
f) DELIBERATE, verb "to balance in the mind" tempts one to ignore that only nature (motion) generates balance (momentum) for ones choice (matter) within.
Others suggest reason (conflict aka imbalance) as balance in the mind to trick ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
tl; dr...can one just be within without others trying to label being from outside?
If one views others as crazy or boring; then one ignores balanced natural order exciting one to adapt.
In other words...passing judgement (you're crazy or boring) upon others tempts one to ignore being within justice aka that which JUST (balance) IS (essence).
I use "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore their free will of choice...and yet they keep trying to idolize the one using choice; instead of ones choice made.
How could free will of choice ever be crazy or boring...unless one chooses it to be?