Others suggest TERROR-ism; consent shapes one into a TERROR-ist.
In other words...jews suggest gentiles to be afraid (strife; war; death; pestilence...horror movies); gentiles getting afraid are then labeled terrorists, hence justifying the "war on terror".
War btw implies reasoning over suggested, and the conflict of reason established through suggested terrorism implies HOPE VS FEAR. Both sides consent to suggested, perpetuate the conflict of reason against each other and permit jews control over both sides, while being outside of it.
Others suggest TERROR-ism; consent shapes one into a TERROR-ist.
In other words...jews suggest gentiles to be afraid (strife; war; death; pestilence...horror movies); gentiles getting afraid are then labeled terrorists, hence justifying the "war on terror".
War btw implies reasoning over suggested, and the conflict of reason established through suggested terrorism implies HOPE VS FEAR. Both sides consent to suggested, perpetuate the conflict of reason against each other and permit jews control over both sides, while being outside of it.