We all know that the internet is a product of US military agencies. Yet, the default idea is that the internet means (more or less) free flow of information and a good thing in general.
But is that so? Could it be that the internet was just another con from the get go? Just a bit longer one than the rest of them. After all, we've seen it before.
For example, smartphones. At the start it was all fun and games. Then it got a bit more serious, but still nice and cool. And now it has turned into opressive slave device, with constant suveillance, that is almost compulsory to have and quite hard to live without.
Is the internet any different? It started as this highway of information, rainbows and unicorns and all that. But now it gets more and more censored, more and more oppressive with each passing day. If current trend continues, at the end it will be nothing more than totally controlled tool of oppression. Could it be that that was its design from the very beginning?
a) World Wide Web implies a web woven together to unite any thing flexible aka flexibility of user expression united under abusers suppression.
b) Internet implies internal net, hence ensnaring users inside (suggestion) and away from outside (perception).
c) Suggested online tempts one to ignore being within (life) line (inception towards death). If ones life is on the line; then one needs to resist; while being "on-line" implies progressing onward, while ignoring to resist.
Aka DARPA/ARPA-net; established within US Department of Defense under Eisenhauer aka EISEN (steel, stalin) HAUER (hitter; hitler). Furthermore; department of defense implies defending the departed minds of few by uniting the minds of many.
The main agenda...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkum olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka united states; united nations; united kingdom; european union; university; uniformity; unisex; unicode; unicef; unilever; universal studios; universal pictures; universal basic income etc, aka collectivism aka multiculturalism; miscegenation; mongrelism; mass migration; melting pot; eugenics/disgenics and so on.
Being implies as free will of choice within the flow of inspiration...others suggest information, which when consented to...
In short: suggested information tempts one to hold onto it; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto. Holding onto implies putting together; being implies apart (form) within whole (flow).
COM/CON implies "with, together"...being implies apart from one another.
a) Each user is different...consenting to suggested internet by few tempts many to respond "alike" aka destroying diversity (life) through equality (inception towards death).
b) Each different screen implies the same "allegory of the cave"... https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg
It doesn't matter what is shown on any screen; only that one consents to look at suggested (fiction), which in return reduces ones sight within perceivable (reality).
Consenting to suggested implies repression of self, while permitting suppression by others. Whatever suggested information ones consenting mind/memory takes on, becomes oppressive to self; because one carries more and more inFORMation around. InSPIRation implies spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) aka impression (inhale) for expression (exhale). One cannot carry around inspiration, hence others tempting one to burden self with endless information.
Consider the difference between RAM (temporary storage) and HARD-DRIVE (ongoing storage)...the former is utilize for adaption to input (perceivable inspiration), while the latter tempts accumulation of input (suggested information).
Being implies in-between beginning (inception) and end (death)...viewing suggested "internet" as a beginning tempts one to ignore origin of being. Others suggest "internal net" to distract those inside from exterior.
The corruption in this world ain't about what others give one (suggestion); but what oneself takes (consent). As soon as one takes; one gives self away to others aka as soon as one buys, one sells self out to others. Whatever others are offering for selling only tempts one to sell self out by buying into it.