Not even subtext
a) Substitute (sub) contradicts equal (even)...suggested nihil-ism (not) tempts ones de-nial thereof.
b) Text (the wording of anything written) implies suggested substitute (word) for perceivable differentiation (spectrum) within equal (sound).
we will give
a) Only one (singular) can wield free "will" of choice...suggested pluralism (we) requires ones consenting free will of choice to choose to ignore self for others.
b) Only balance gives choice; while "giving" consent to other choices implies ignoring ones choice, hence imbalance of self.
fully adopted
To adopt implies "take to one's self"...one cannot take full/entire/whole to one's self without ignoring to be partial (one) within whole (oneness).
Suggested "adopt" contradicts perceivable "adapt". Ones perception needs to adapt to all perceivable; while the suggestions by others tempt one to adopt them.
environmental causes
a) Suggested pluralism (causes) tempts singular (effect) to ignore self discernment within singularity (cause).
b) ENVIRON (surrounding) implies perceivable cause for ones perceiving MENT (mind) being affected by it.
Mind/memory can only exist at center of surrounding input.
making believable
a) make belief
b) MAKE; noun (Latin gemaca) - "mate, equal; one of a pair, comrade"
c) The Talmud has two components: the mishnah and the gemara/gemaca...
d) One cannot make (equal) without ignoring being (different).
information and credible
Aka suggested information towards consenting creed/credo/credit...
resisting...confronting
To confront implies together (con) forwards (front); to resist implies responding (re) to stance (sistere) within origin.
If resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) confronts outcomes; then resistance ignores velocity.
behemoth of lies
Aka Hebrew; b'hemoth - "beast"; which implies being (be) astute/discerning (ast).
If one ignores to be astute (beast) aka discerning self within perceivable for consenting to the suggestions by others; then one marks/mercs/limits self.
peer reviewed
Ones response (re) to view the suggestions of ones equal (peer); which implies ones ignorance of sight within perceivable differentiation.
If one sees something; then that implies a differentiation between some-thing and one-thing. Equals cannot exist within differentiation.
Polaris never moves, ever.
a) PO'LARIZE, verb -"to communicate polarity to"...how does communication over distance (all perceivable towards ones perception) work without motion?
b) Notice that "never" contradicts "ever"...
- PEER, noun (Latin par) - "an equal; one of the same"
Being implies as one different from one another. A being cannot be equal to another being, since each came to be at a different position from one another.
Appear implies perceivable differences; "a peer" implies suggested semblance.
What do they have to gain by stating the earth is round?
a) Waves (life) within a line (inception towards death) can be tricked to turn against each other within circular reasoning.
b) Perception within perceivable implies center of souROUNDing...the suggestions by others tempt ones consent off-center and into CIRCEcumference.
c) What do few gain if many willingly ignore everything perceivable nature offers for the suggestions by few?
a) Treason (treacherous) implies against another; artificial work (machina) implies from another...both tempt one to ignore self for others.
b) Before one can view self as WITH others; one exists WITH-IN all.
language used is often simple
Suggested language implies words shaped by setting letters together...aka a complex/composite of more than one. Sound implies whole (perceivable) setting itself apart (perception) aka whole (oneness) into partials (ones) aka simple/single.
Sound (simple) or Words (complex)...one is perceivable as self; the other suggested by others. Consenting to the latter; tempts one to ignore former.
Of course water can curve, it's a fluid...water at rest is always flat, level, and horizontal.
REST, noun - "cessation of motion" contradicts FLUID; adjective (Latin fluere) - "to flow". Water (matter) seeking level implies balancing (momentum) within motion.
The trick...ones consent to suggested words tempts one to hold onto definitions (definite; affixed), which implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death).
It can take the shape of anything you put it in, or forces applied to it
a) What if it (matter) already exists within (momentum) an outside force (motion)?
b) What if form (life) can only be shaped within the mold (momentum) of flow (motion)?
c) What if calling matter (water) motion (fluid) tempts one to ignore the perceivable mold for those molding suggestions aka those who make the calls?
equally on all sides
How can sides differentiated from one another be equal? While you're considering that...why do few suggest equality (same) through diversity (difference) towards many?
a "conspiracy scene"
Always an aggregation; a group; a coming together...which aligns with tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or shevirat hakeilim (shattering of the vessels).
like this one...
...aka the ONE apart from ONE another; which ONE ignores when consenting to suggested aggregation; groups; coming together etc.
The CON in con-spire implies "together; with"; while SPIRO (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies as one (expression) within all (impression).
In short...to be implies in-spire; ignoring this permits others to "con-spire".
paid off by ((money))
How does one resist selling out to few; when the majority keeps buying into?
good info
Good vs bad...always a conflict, when consenting to any suggested information.
Alex Jones vs this Matt Guy
a) Again...it doesn't matter what information anyone suggests; only which (good vs bad) side one chooses to consent to.
b) If you exchange AJ and Matt with Mr. Beast and Logan Paul; then your choice remains the same...want vs not want. The information is irrelevant to your choice; it's your consent within a conflict of reason that all suggested information aims at.
the elite
French élite - "selection, choice" aka ones free will of choice selecting whatever others are suggesting....ones choice selects chosen ones suggestion.
Disruption of flat surface...
if you don't warm someone up to an idea (nature of reality) by gradually feeding it to them it can really fuck them up.
a) How fucked up can one be to be cold to the nature of reality?
b) If one suggests the "nature of reality" for consumption to another; then what if that tempts others to ignore that nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)?
c) What if nature implies rapid hunger; which those within exploit by suggesting artificial consumption of gradual appetite? Notice that whatever few are suggesting; many want or not want more of it?
Hunger (perceivable need) or Appetite (suggested want) implies ones free will of choice in-between. One needs to resist wanted temptations. Why? To grow resistance.
reasons, and implications
Reason contradicts implication. Big Mac versus Whopper implies a conflict of reason; which in return tempts one to ignore that...if one consumes what another suggests (want or not want); then one ignores perceivable (need).
There's no conflict within implication (if/then); only within reason. To reason implies against another; implication implies as self in response to origin.
what not will still even connect
Few suggest many to "connect"; while ignoring that nature sets apart. If growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) makes connections; then all connections will be lost.
a) ARROWS (phonetic eros) aka eran - "to desire".
b) Perception (rise) within perceivable (loss) implies "high-way"; consenting to suggested implies "sub-way".
c) DE (entirely) TAILLIER (to cut into pieces)...guess who's "in the details"?
Entire (inception towards death) cut into pieces (life) aka "cut my life into pieces, this is my last resort"... https://genius.com/Papa-roach-last-resort-lyrics
- "Downward spiral, where do I begin?"
- Searchin' to find a love upon a higher level"
- "Findin' nothin' but questions and devils"
a) Artificial Intelligence (AI) implies a jew suggesting artifice (information) and gentiles consenting to understand (Latin intelligo) aka to willingly stand-under it.
If one resists suggested information (artifice) for perceivable inspiration (nature); then one can discern that HE-BREW HIS-STORY to trick JEW/YOU to fall for it.
b) Nature implies shortage (life) within abundance (inception towards death)...it ain't a storage system for information; but an action towards reactions system of moving inspiration to draw from.
c) Nature doesn't impress durable (to write) it directs ongoing flow (inception towards death) towards temporary wave-form (life), hence impressing (perceivable inspiration) breakable (each ones perception).
creatures to be separated from
Being implies as partial within whole...suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore origin of separation for division among other beings.
exorcism
Ex (out of) horkos (oath) implies ones consent to suggested -ism, which binds one to another.
Oath implies being holding onto each others suggestions; while ignoring that perceivable implies oath-breaking. In other words...whatever form (life) holds onto; flow (inception towards death) breaks apart.
stop your body from the spirit being able to connect with it
Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies solid (life) adapting to fluid (inception towards death)...others suggest "stop" and "connect" to distract one from discerning that motion sets apart, and therefore that one is partial matter within whole motion.
they're causing this separation from god
To suggest that "they're causing" contradicts the one and only cause (god)...if one consents to believe it.
Muddying (turbid) the waters; instead of letting it clear.
how you think things will go
The only way things can go...forwards aka back to origin.
things cannot continue
Only within continuance (whole) can there be things (partials)....suggested nihilism (cannot) tempts one to ignore that.
Telepathy
Aka tele (distance; to stand apart) path (passageway)...being implies TELE (life) within PATH (inception towards death).
To "communicate with people telepathically" implies artificially put together that which nature sets apart, and ones consent to the suggestions by another implies the putting together of artifice (information), while ignoring natural (inspiration).
straight up go to Dante's inferno
a) He left his path (perceivable inspiration) and then followed a guide (suggested information) through the circles (circular reasoning).
b) Nel mezzo del cammin di nostra vita (midway in the journey of our life) aka middle (life) of way (inception towards death).
That mezzo/middle one ignores when consenting to stand-under (understand) the suggestions by another. In other words...consenting to a chosen ones suggestion; tempts ones choice off balance, hence off center and into surrounding.
Concentric circles implies "common center"; being implies unique center aka each ones perception at the center of all perceivable circumference.
c) The suggesting guide was called VIRGIL aka Bibliomancy; noun - "divination by opening a book at random; prognostication of future events"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bibliomancy#etymonline_v_11117
Following the suggestions by others tempts one to ignore perceivable origin.
Have you ever heard of a prison...
Have you ever heard of a prison that wasn't suggested to you by others? Consenting to such a suggestion confines ones mind to the suggested, hence establishing im-prison-ment aka mind within prison.
Meanwhile within perceivable reality...EVER (continually) implies the continuous nature (inception towards death) for each temporary being (life) within.
I'm just done with the word games.
- GAME, noun - "sport of any kind"
- SPORT, noun - "that which diverts"
- DIVERT, verb - "to turn off from any course, direction"
Perceivable (sound) implies direction; suggested (words) implies diversion.
Freedom is a basic human instinct
INSTINCT', adjective (Latin instinctus) - "moved; animated; excited"...only within a dominating circumference (inception towards death) can there be a free center (life).
Free to grow, within dominant loss.
DOMINANT, adjective - "Latin , to rule; lord, master; a house; to overcome, to subdue"...aka natural order (inception towards death) as the power over being (life).
prison
a) Suggested prison tempts one to ignore perceivable PRISM, noun - "solid whose bases or ends are similar/equal" aka different solids (life) within same liquid base (inception towards death).
b) Suggested prison refers to imprisonment/confinement aka mentally restricting self to the suggestions by others, while ignoring to be free will of choice within perceivable.
c) The physical prison is designed to mimic (while corrupting) a MONASTERY; noun (Latin monasterium, sole; separate)...hence separating goyim from the aggregation of society, while simultaneously forcing the separated ones closer to one another.
This once again is designed to trick ones mind into confining self from perceivable surrounding.
Do you not have a duty to resist?
"Not" aka suggested nihil-ism and ones consent to de-nial everything perceivable for it...that implies succumbing to, while ignoring to resist.
DUTY, noun - "that which a person owes to another"...hence call of duty implying the suggested information by others, tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
Suggestion is the wanted vs not wanted temptation one needs to resist.
the warden kills your friends and family
This implies suggested progressivism tempting others to focus on outcome (death), while ignoring perceivable origin...one needs to resist the wanted temptation to think like this, which in return guards/wards self.
would like...unfettered access
How many gentiles like access to pornography, and how few of those comprehend that ones consent to suggested pornography implies the fetter/chain?
No ID to vote No ID to view adult material No ID to enter your country
What if jews suggest voting; adultery and migration to promote ID aka IDEN'TICAL, adjective (Latin idem, the same)...as to distract each consenting gentile from discerning to be different from one another?
a) Retirement implies withdrawing/retreating from mind/memory. That's impossible within a moving system; which sets mind/memory/momentum forwards.
b) Work implies energy (internal/inherent power) and the power within energy implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death); hence working till death.
Sleight of hand: "Arbeit macht frei" aka work (energy) will set you free (will of choice).
c) Working for others towards retirement implies the suggested temptation by few to tempt consenting many to work themselves to death in hopes for benefits.
A jew suggests a burned offering (holocaust) aka KINDLE FIRE...gentiles consent to put books in it.