sides must combine
a) What if sides (inception/death) set apart being (life)?
b) Who benefits from combining others...few or many?
just a teacher who was picked at random
CHRIST(a)...must be a coincidence with the explosion of christ... https://img.gvid.tv/i/JDiGzgZi.jpg
pharisees was the most corrupt
- PHAR'ISEE, noun (Hebrew; to separate)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/pharisee
- CORRUPT, verb (to break, separate or dissolve)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/corrupt
The issue...nature breaks itself from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception), while partials utilize suggestion to bind each other together, which they call for example RELGION (Latin religio; to bind anew).
Lawful (inception towards death) generates corruption (life)...hence ones struggle to sustain self.
whether spiritually or politically I am not sure.
Spiritual implies ones adaptation to origin; while political implies ones pursuit of outcome.
Muslims believe...
One who submits (muslim) consents (believe) to the suggestion of another, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable.
Matt Walsh is...Ben Shapiro is...Andrew Klavan is...
Everything was before anyone within can suggest what is...a suggestion requires ones consent to pass.
ALL (allah) was before one can suggest what is...all doesn't brand anyone Matt Walsh; Ben Shapiro; Andrew Klavan or anything else...one does be free will of choice.
mysterious reason
Reasoning over suggested conceals implication of perceivable...if one consents to it. Reason implies imbalance; implication implies balance....being implies choice. Others suggest reason to imbalance ones choice.
justify banning bible?
If one consents to suggested writing in the name of justice, then one permits another to authorize or ban what's written.
ALL (allah) implies that which JUST IS (justice)...each one within needs to adapt to that, while being tempted with wanting to ignore perceivable for each others suggestions.
ALL gives each one a free will of choice....all perceivable (need) or another ones suggestion (want). Choosing want over need establishes want vs not want aka a conflict of reason among many over the suggestions by few.
self-hating ideology?
Ideology implies suggested idealism (ideo) by another and ones consent to reason (logy) over it against others, hence love vs hate.
Consenting to another ones suggestion ignores sustenance of oneself within perceivable....many doing that benefits few.
In other words...suggested ideology tempts one to deny/ignore self for conflicts (love vs hate) against others.
How can protestants debate this?
a) PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it)
b) To protest implies ones consent to the suggestion by another; which then establishes a debate among all those consenting aka a conflict of reason.
to be...of freedom democracy and Christianity
a) Being implies free (will of choice) within dom (inance of balance) aka temporary free (life) during ongoing domination (inception towards death).
b) Democracy aka demos (people) and kratos (strength) implies the strength of an aggregated people aka suggesting few being permitted to wield consenting many.
c) Christ implies "anointed one" aka each off-spring coming to be from father through mother aka consecrated by oil/eal/fire/heat aka inflammability of kin.
why isn't there a debate
Is vs isn't implies debate aka de (divided) bate (batter) aka a conflict of reason within the mind/memory of each one consenting to anything suggested by another.
Consider this...Water vs wine implies a fictitious debate tempting one to ignore reality...thirst. There's no debate with thirst...just ones ignorance thereof when debating others.
I will not stop spreading god's words
a) ALL moves sound; ones within shape words to tempt others ones to ignore sound.
b) Suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything moves, hence tempting one to believe in cessation of motion (stop).
ALL cannot be stopped by anyone within...other ones tempt one with suggested words like "not + stop" to ignore all.
c) I implies ones claim over self, which brands other ones as "YOU" (phonetic jew)...one cannot claim anything within ALL without ignoring that ongoing ALL supplies temporal ones with everything.
Potential cannot be held onto; it needs to be expressed (life) during impression (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
until all
ALL implies beginning (inception) until end (death) for each one (life) within...others suggest the rhetoric "until all" to invert ones perception.
The world is a strange place.
a) STRANGE, adjective - "foreign; not domestic; belonging to others"
b) World implies domicile for each native placed within, who are foreign to one another.
b) Suggested "belonging" (to appertain; to hold) tempts one to ignore perceivable be-long...being short (life) within long (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "Hey shortie...it's your birthday"
d) Ones consent to suggested the-ism tempts one to feel native to a foreign place.
e) World "was" perceivable before anyone placed within can suggest what it "is".
impossible to get more energy out of
a) What if energy implies foundation (whole) for inherent potential (partials)?
b) What if wanting to "get out" prevents one from discerning self to be within need?
c) MORE than all perceivable offered to each ones perception?
hydrogen
What if HYDRO (temporal) GEN (ongoing)? Trying to split temporal further sure makes getting more seem impossible, but what if ongoing can't be depleted by anything temporal within?
What generates (gen) water (hydro)? Why is gas called "aeriform fluid"? What if caloric (matter of heat) can only be temporal?
what you put into the process
Which process precedes inception? Into what is life born?
splitting the water
a) Water finding level implies partial balancing within whole...why split a partial further?
b) Why are few suggesting...AT'OM, noun (Latin atomus; from not, and to cut) - "a particle of matter so minute as to admit of no division"?
Doesn't particle imply a division within whole?
Top Oncologist
a) -ist (bottom) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (top)
b) Onko (tumor; mass) Logic (reasoning against another over suggested)
Many are reasoning against each other about what few are suggesting aka few are amassing many within conflicts of reason...that's a tumor.
twist words
TWIST, verb - "to unite by winding one thread, strand or other flexible substance round another; to form by convolution"...what if suggested words twist perceivable sound? What if consenting to a suggestion implies a convolution aka a binding anew of that which nature set apart?
I live in the balkans...
- BALK, noun - "any thing left untouched"
- BALK, verb - "to disappoint; to frustrate; to leave untouched; to miss or omit; to turn aside"
What do we call crimes like this?
a) CRIME; noun - "to decree; to separate"...bringing together (e pluribus unum; out of many one aka united states) contradicts crime.
b) Being implies apart from one another...others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt one to ignore self.
c) Only apart within all can one call outwards.
breaking the law
It's what natural law does aka breaking itself into L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka separation by decree.
Treason
a) Treason under natural law implies betrayal aka being-trans-all aka being (life) within all (inception towards death)...a transaction.
b) Treason under the laws of men implies a breach of trust aka breaking apart the bond between ones consent and another ones suggestion by natural law.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto; which moving nature breaks apart.
Trust generates treason.
Does Ed Snowden always tweet without capitalization and punctuation?
Resisting capitalization and punctuation sustains edward aka ead (prosperity) + weard (guardian). Why? Because punctuation implies point (end of sentence); while capital implies property generating life sentences.
Velocity (inception towards death) generating resistance (life) implies the "old scratch"...the longer one ignores to resist; the more it itches, until it becomes unbearable.
Itching implies "restless desire" aka the temptation (want) for resistance (need) to ignore resisting by free will of choice.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...SCRAT chasing the NUT (nucleus; any body about which matter is collected) aka ongoing (inception towards death) chasing temporary (life) from beginning towards end... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uuua5lVrdP0&t=2s
Refugees From Gaza
Does GAZA (Hebrew 'az; force, strength) require REFUGE (assistance in distress)?
Distress aka DIS (apart) STRINGERE (press together)...how does a contradiction (apart/together) assists effort?
flooding US
If flow (inception towards death) sets apart form (life); then tempting partials together into UNITED STATES establishes a flood aka a deluge to take apart the indigestion.
Regime is Considering
a) Regime aka reg (to direct in a straight line) implies whole (inception towards death) directing partials (life) in a straight line...putting together sides (con-side) within whole shortens the life span of partials.
b) In reality...regime (inception towards death) generates resistance (life), while during fiction a regime tempts submission of resistance.
Biden...considering
Biden; bide (to stay, continue, live, remain) or con-side (putting sides together to shorten life in-between)...BIDE or CON-SIDE...it's ones free will of choice.
even jews
Perception...even (inception towards death) generating odds (life)
Suggestion...jews evening the odds among gentiles
think about that for a moment
a) "about" implies "around; on the exterior"...jews suggest aboutism to tempt gentiles into thinking circular (around), while ignoring to be center (perception) within circumference (perceivable).
b) "for a moment" implies forward momentum (inception towards death) of motion from the perspective of matter (life) within...which one ignores when thinking circular.
Opposite of circle implies line...hence putting ones life on the line.
This is the sound of...
a) "this" implies a differentiation from "that"...SOUND (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken" implies the origin (whole) of internal differentiation (partials).
b) A jew suggesting a word "this" in the name of sound to tempt gentiles to ignore sound (perceivable) for words (suggested). If gentiles consent; then a jew is being permitted to define; redefine and contradict sound with words. This implies crafting spells.
c) Suggested "IS" tempts one to ignore that perceivable "WAS" before any suggestion can be shaped within.
Ones consent to another ones suggestion doubles what IS (ISIS), hence establishing dual-ism (two). One cannot double what WAS...
ID
Identical implies same; being implies differentiated from one another. Few tempt many with equality through diversity to react "alike".
Equal (inception towards death) generates differences (life) by setting whole apart.
digital
Aka "integer under 10" and integer (whole number) implies ONE aka whole (oneness) for each partial (ones) within.
Those who ignore self discernment (1) by counting others (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) are ignoring perceivable reality (1) for suggested fiction (0).
Zero (Arabic sifr; cipher) implies "absence of" and ones consent to the suggestions by another implies ones abdication of sense.
a) GARTH; noun from gher - "to grasp, enclose" contradicts free will of choice. Few utilize suggestion to tempt many to grasp it by consent, hence enclosing oneself with the suggestions by another.
b) Notice that after medication; Garth lost his memory...and so the first thing he does afterwards is grasping the hand of Kirk aka kirkja "church".
c) "Whom Gods Destroy"...written by Lee Erwin & Jerry Sohl and directed by Herb Wallerstein..."this episode was not aired by the BBC in the United Kingdom because of sadistic plot elements".
- OBE aka outer (motion) body (momentum) experience (matter)
Few are distracting many from momentum by calling matter "body" aka FRAME, verb - "to fabricate by orderly construction and union of various parts".
That's the foundation for e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka equality through diversity etc.
Ones consent to suggested information permits another to frame within perceivable inspiration. All those consenting become the framed body for the suggesting few aka a GOLEM.
wave modulation
Being implies wave-form (life) within direct-flow (inception towards death)...others suggest modulation (composed of interchangeable units) to destroy units within change by tempting together what nature sets apart from one another.
ID aka Identic (Latin idem) - "the same"...off-spring implies differentiation. Birth implies coming out of origin and into being aka out of same and into difference. Father through mother into child...a differentiation/separation/setting apart from one another.
IDENTIC (same) FICA (fruit) TION (action)...fruit of action (inception towards death) implies reactions (life) aka cause generating effects aka loss generating growth aka whole generating partials etc.
not even creative
Suggested creationism implies "out of nothing"...even implies balance (momentum) within everything (motion) for everyone (matter) inside making odd choices.
a) Two implies composition of one and one...nature disperses all (whole) into each one (partials).
b) Solar; sol; soul; sole...there can be only one.
c) Sy-stem implies symmetrical (inception towards death) setting differentials (life), and differentiation implies separation from one another.
d) Credit stupefies aka perceivable moves; while accrediting suggested tempts one to ignore that. One cannot hold onto anything within a moving system without corrupting self.
a) Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)
b) Gentiles consenting to jewish suggestions implies OCCUPY; verb - "to take possession of and retain or keep". A jew utilizing suggestion to tempt gentiles to consent implies AVOCATION; noun - "a calling away from one's occupation".
Why does that work? Because nature cannot be occupied by those within; yet those within can tempt each other with avocation (to sell) and occupation (to buy).
c) GAZA (Hebrew; az) - "force; strength"...active power (inception towards death) generates reactive powers (life)...ones reaction to suggestion empowers another, while weakening self.
will be
A suggested inversion of perceivable...being will. No one else can will being; only being can will. Being willing to ignore that for whatever another suggests...that's too tempting for many to resist, and so a few are permitted to shape what will be.
CON (together; with) contradicts SELF (particular aka apart from one another)...
All mainstream technology
Main stream (inception towards death) implies natural, which generates resistance (life). Others suggest TECHNOL'OGY, noun (Greek; art, word or discourse; reason) as the artificial opposition to natural, hence suggested "mainstream" tempting one to follow.
Main stream implies ALL; technology tempts ONE to ignore ALL.
Anything that is run by a committee
a) Any implies each (partial) within every (whole) aka a setting apart from one another...COM (together; with) contradicts that.
b) Ones consent to suggested com-unity-ism (communism) implies ones commitment to another.
c) Only nature runs (inception towards death)...each one within implies re-run (life).
Sleight of hand: "And I ran, I ran so far away...I couldn't get away"
- Motion implies source
- Momentum implies open (inception) and close (death)
- Matter implies free to share (life).
Suggested WARE (veer; change direction) tempts one to consent to freeware; shareware; hardware; software...while paying for it by selling self out to another. Suggestion tempts ones consent to merchandise self to another, hence a jew being permitted to be merchant by gentile consent to be ware.
Only merchant controls wares...not consumer.
Yeah man, I tell ya what, man, that dang ol’ internet, man, you just go in on there and point and click, talk about w-w-dot-w-com, mean you got the naked chicks on there, man, just go click, click, click, click, click, it’s real easy, man.
the connection to sin and demons
a) THE-ism connects those consenting with those suggesting.
b) TION (action) separates into reactions...others suggest "connection" to tempt reactions together aka many tempted to follow directions by few leaders.
c) TO aka towards implies a separation of whole (inception towards death) into partials (life)...not a connection.
d) SIN implies a voluntary departure aka division of partials within whole against each other. This is called "reasoning" and few utilize suggestion to tempt many to reason against each other about it.
e) AND is a conjunction, connective or conjoining word...and if one utilize it; then one CONNECTS with another.
If all is one in energy; then energy AND what else?
f) Demon aka dai-mon (divider-provider) aka provider (inception towards death) and divider (life). Nature provides separation; those within wield the free will of choice to ignore that for division against each other, and division (reason) requires connection (consent to suggestion) first.
what is
a) Energy...what else?
b) All was perceivable before ones within can suggest what it is.
If free will of choice operates under an owner; then it would contradict itself.