There's no such thing as "Abrahamic religions"
Religion/religio - "to bind anew" + abraham aka abh (father) ruham (multitude) implies ONE ignoring self when consenting to suggestions by another ONE, which establishes many under few.
FREE will of choice implies singular, hence each one being free to choose among one another within all...ignoring all (perceivable) for one another (suggested) binds self to another.
I am that I am
ME; MYSELF or I implies one taking possession over self, while ignoring that ALL (whole) sets each ONE (partials) free from one another.
I contradicts ONE because a partial (one) cannot take possession of anything without ignoring whole (oneness).
the average jewish person
a) AVERAGE - "equal share of loss (inception towards death) among different parties (life)... a jew suggests gentiles to equalize differences (equality through diversity) to establish an unequal share of loss among jew and gentiles.
b) To establish such unequal share; a jew suggests THE-ism to tempt consenting gentiles to authorize suggesting jew.
This establishes ones choice (many) under chosen one (few)...an uneven distribution of choice, ignoring that nature gives each one free will of choice.
c) A jew suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each singular (person) gentile to ignore self for others, and to ignore being BY (per) SOUND (sonos) and therefore WITHIN (in) SOUND (sanus).
Once again...suggested spell-craft "insane person" is utilized to tempt gentiles into reasoning against one another who is or isn't an insane person, which distracts both sides from drawing inspiration from perceivable implication (if/then) of being in sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
bunch of laws
Aka suggested pluralism (laws) distracting from perceivable singularity...L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...natural law sets each one apart from one another, and each one balances on land; breathes air and sustains self as solid (life) during fluid (inception towards death) of water.
Consenting to suggested bundles/bunches together aka binds free will of choice anew.
manipulating them into doing
a) Automatic (inception towards death) generates manual (life)...manipulation requires manual consent to manual suggestion, while ignoring perceivable automatic.
b) One cannot be manipulated by others...one wields the free will of choice to manually permit others to manipulate (to manage by mental influence aka government) ones consent with suggested information; which one willingly holds onto; follows along and submits self to.
c) DO (inception towards death) generates RE-DO (life), hence reacting partials being enabled to react to enacting whole.
truth of slavery
Choosing any suggested information to be truth or lie enslaves one to a conflict (truth vs lie) between both, while establishing those suggesting as master of both sides.
You can't keep a slave
a) Keeping enslaves one to what one holds onto; letting go reliefs burden upon ones free will of choice.
b) Nature sets free; choosing to keep anything within binds free.
c) Bind/bond/band - "anything that binds, fastens, or confines; an agreement or covenant; an instrument binding one to pay a sum to another" implies ones free will of choice consenting to the suggested information by another one.
Religion (Latin religio) - "to BIND anew"... hence ones choice (slave) binding self to chosen one (master).
not born to be one
a) Being ONE implies apart from ONE another, hence set free from ONE another...not bound together.
b) There can be only one aka all (whole) for one (partial) and one (partial) for all (whole) aka alone...ALL(in)ONE.
owning a debt
Ones consent to a suggestion implies taking into possession (own) a burden (debt) from another.
One (perception) does not own a debt to all (perceivable)...since one (temporary matter) cannot hold onto all (ongoing motion).
for nefarious reasons
a) FOR implies being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death).
b) NE (not) FARI (to speak) implies perceivable sound (natural), as opposed to suggested words (artificial).
c) Reason implies a conflict (versus) about suggested; while ignoring implication (if/then) of being perception within perceivable.
conformist
-IST (conformist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (conformism)... a jew suggests -isms to tempt gentiles CON (together; with), while ignoring that flow (inception towards death) sets form (life) apart from one another.
individualism a myth
a) A jew suggests both individual-ISM and mystic-ISM to tempt gentiles to consent.
b) Being implies one apart from one another...suggested individualism tempts one to divide self in two (dual) aka into a conflict of reason against one another.
c) MYTH; noun - "speech, thought, word, discourse, conversation; story, saga, tale, myth, anything delivered by word of mouth" implies suggested information (word); which tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (sound)....this implies spell-craft aka few utilizing suggestion to craft the spelling for consenting many.
remaking
RE (ones perception) MAKE (all perceivable)...that's natural aka all perceivable makes ones perception react. The suggestions by others imply artificial and reacting to that implies ignoring natural.
the world
Suggested the-ism tempts one to conceal self within a world/vault by submitting ones free will of choice to another. That vault/wel - "to turn" implies circular reasoning over suggested information held within ones mind/memory.
The world of many exists within their minds only and is being shaped by few from outside. Plato's cave is ones memory, within which ones consent keeps one shackled to the suggested information by others.
Holding onto anything within ones memory tempts one to ignore light (discernment) for shadows (ignorance) aka moving inspiration for held on information. Holding onto implies concealing; letting go implies revealing.
toward
a) Being alive implies being moved from inception TOWARDs death...there's no other outcome for living than dying, because living implies coming into the process of dying.
Income (inception) - coming to be within (life) - outcome (death)
b) Few suggest progressivism to tempt many to follow towards outcomes, while ignoring to resist origin.
Sleight of hand: https://forward.com/ aka jewish. Independent. Non profit. What does profit imply? Set (fit) forward (pro)...
There is a control agenda
a) Agenda/agent/action doesn't roll together (con-trol)...it reveals reactions by setting each apart from one another.
b) Agenda from PIE root ag- "to drive, draw out or forth, move"...being implies seed springing forth from root, hence being moved.
most likely humans
Human aka hue (color) of man implies a visible spectrum of light; within which each ray is set apart from one another, hence differentiated....not alike.
A jew equalizes (inception towards death) differences (life) by tempting gentiles to react alike, which in return permits a chosen one to remain apart.
mass revealed
Motion (inception towards death) reveals matter (life) by setting apart...few within amass many together to conceal that revelation of matter.
is so hard people disbelief
To believe implies to hold onto, which costs ones resistance. Disbelief implies letting go of what one spends resistance to hold onto. The cost of spending ones own resistance is hard (matter) within the soft (motion) velocity of nature.
PEOPLE (suggested pluralism) is what PERSON (perceiving singular) chooses to hold onto, while selling self out to others for...and it's fucking hard to let go of, because it feels like a self sacrifice.
we do know
a) To know implies each singular one perceiving all perceivable...suggested pluralism (we) tempts one to ignore self for others.
b) WE; pronoun - "I and another or others aka we two"...there's no perceivable two without one counting and suggesting dualism to another.
As for AND...energy and what else? If energy is one; then what is two?
The Sanhedrin exists
a) Sanhedrin/synedrion - "assembly"...a jew assembles gentiles by tempting together aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka by equalizing (inception towards death) differences (life) set apart by nature.
b) Ex-ist implies ones consent to suggested existential-ism...doing so tempts one to ignore being EX (life) IM (inception towards death) aka expression (temporary growth) within impressing (ongoing loss).
running the show
SHOW/sceawian/skew - "behold, look at"...ones consent runs suggested shows.
Holding onto, while being (life) moved (inception towards death) implies running out of resistance.
Looking at (suggested) implies ignoring sight within (perceivable). To focus implies a point of convergence, which contradicts ones life sentence being moved towards point of death. Converging that which natures sets apart...destroys the converging partial, hence burning resistance.
Notice that nature reveals all perceivable to each ones perception...subterfuge implies concealment, hence tempting one to seek to escape. Doing so within nature implies escaping revelation.
Escaping shadows (suggested information); while ignoring revelation by light (perceivable inspiration)...what if one remains within shadow for as long as one holds onto something another suggested?
we do not know
- WE...suggested pluralism to tempt perceiving partial to ignore self for others.
- DO...suggested initialism tempting one to ignore being done by all, while enabled to redo self.
- NOT...suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting one to ignore all (everything perceivable)
- KNOW...ones perception of all perceivable, which the suggestions of others tempt one to ignore.
who runs the show
Those looking at temptations shown by others are running out of resistance.
A consortium?
Many are the consortium of few aka collectivized partials following the lead of those remaining apart. It's called democracy aka DEMOS (people as a collective) KRATOS (strength)...the accumulated weakness of many becomes the strength of the few accumulating them.
Nature doesn't consort...it singles out each one from one another.
Those still need leadership
Where does a ship need to be led to? To a harbor which prevents a sea going vessel from navigating the sea? What lead does a ship need to follow?
SHIP/skip/skee - "to split" aka from whole sea (flow) into each partial vessel (form) navigating within aka nautical (inception towards death) generating terrestrial (life).
NAUTICAL/naughty/naught/nawiht - "nothing"...
He with this much power does not need attention drawn to him.
a) Power drives (inception towards death)...weakness (life) needs to draw power from being driven.
b) Attention aka AD (toward) TENDERE (to stretch) TION (action)...action (inception towards death) stretches out reactions (life).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Kenny-rogers-and-dolly-parton-islands-in-the-stream-lyrics
- "Tender love is blind...It requires a dedication"
- "All this love we feel...Needs no conversation"
There is a shadow in our world.
a) Light (motion) fragments (momentum) into particles (matter); which cast shadows onto each other.
b) Darkness (ignorance) within brightness (discernment)
c) "As I walk through the vALLey in the shadow of death...I take a look at my life and realize there's nothin' left"... https://genius.com/Coolio-gangstas-paradise-lyrics
Criticism and hate are not the same thing
a) Hate implies vs love...a division against another. Critic (Greek krinein) implies separate from one another.
Natural law (inception towards death) discriminates (life) by setting apart.
b) Ones consent to a suggested -ism (criticism) establishes a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree); while permitting others to rebrand it into for example love vs hate.
c) Same (all perceivable) generates differences (each ones perception)...few equalize differences by suggesting many to respond alike.
the freedom it promised
BLOCK CHAIN... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2Q1d9Nvv.jpg
want humanity to accept
Acceptance implies wanting or not wanting suggested, while ignoring the perceivable need to resist wanted temptation.
shilling; botting; guilt tripping and gaslighting didn't convince gamers...
a) To play a game implies to consent to a suggestion aka to buy into something sold by selling self out.
b) Those who suggest games already have consent/acceptance by players...shilling; botting; guilt tripping and gaslighting etc. is applied to continuously reduce/drain/milk/harvest remaining resistance to temptation.
Tales of Kenzera
Keep your fucking hands of Namco Tales Studio...oh wait; it's just some butt-ugly we wuz Metroidvania; published by EA. Into the Stolypin wagon and to the Taiga with them...davai, davai!
Reality (now) or artifice (past; present; future)...one can be perceived; the other is being suggested.
- PIE root of TIME - di-mon
- PIE root of DEMON - dai-mon
Diametric opposites are not the same
a) Does life being moved from inception towards death imply within same flow?
b) Measuring (metric) two (dia) implies ONEs choice to do so...viewing inception and death as not the same opposites implies ones diametrical decision to distort self.
an attention whore
- About free-will-of-choice...Post Score (0)
- Questionable aka "ask me anything"
Which one seeks attention from others?
I have complimented you
A complying mind ignores "free" will of choice.
"Rip off much?" ~Donatien Alphonse François de Sade
one who was born a jew
To christen implies to anoint aka ones birth...each one is born christend aka as anointed one. One isn't born a jew, but chosen by another.
The deception at play...each one is born christ; ones consent to a suggestion selects another as chosen one (jew), while ignoring self, hence becoming anti-christ.
In other words...chosen one implies ones choice, which one ignores when consenting to the suggestion of another one.
INCEPTION ------------------------- DEATH...only within that flat line can life shape forms.
reset...preparing
a) To prepare implies towards outcome; reset aka response to setting implies in response to origin.
b) Preparation (inception towards death) generates adaptation (life).
Sleight of hand: "It shall be given to them for whom it is prepared." ~Matthew 20:23.
If one is jewed, if it's possible, then some other one was jewing, or practicing Jewery.
- A jew: "Kill Yourself; Goy"
That implies a suggested temptation for ones consent. It has no power of its own until empowered by ones free will of choice. Rebranding this suggested temptation into for example https://img.gvid.tv/i/2kAnHEvi.jpg ...that's jewing.
manipulating the population as directed by their master
Here's the issue...ones free will of choice empowers the master and establishes the manipulation when consenting to a suggested temptation.
Furthermore...ones consent to follow permits another to suggest directions, while manipulating oneself to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death)...a direction inspiring resistance from those living within.
jew as a religion or race
a) Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
b) Race/raddix/radius/ray implies ones growth within all, hence from center outwards like a seed within soil.
c) Consenting to a jewish suggestion implies religion; which tempts those consenting off-center and into circumference, while permitting those suggesting to erect self at center, which a jew uses to cut off gentiles from circumference aka circumcision.
That's for example how a central bank cuts off trustees within circumference into poverty and debt after tempting each one to give trust aka consent.
Another example...city implies center, which is where jew erects high-rise, while cutting off gentiles first into down-town, then through suburbia into outskirts.
it's like an action
Same action (inception towards death) generating different reactions (life)...a jew suggests gentiles to react alike; to equalize differences (equality through diversity) to mimic action (actor) by following direction (director).
or a strategy
Aka stratos - "multitude" aka stere (to spread) + agein (to lead)...that's few (jew) leading the spread of many (gentiles).
people hide behind the word Jew
Phonetic JEW/YOU...established by one claiming self as "me; myself or I", which within a balance based system, brands everyone else into a "YOU". That's how jewing works.
If ONE chooses to let go of "me; myself and I", then "you" will fall away from all other ONES including chosen ONES...that's how one reveals what's behind the curtain of ones own ignorance.
I choose to associate that word with
Before you make that association by slapping the word onto anything or anyone, your consent made the association with the one suggesting the word...that's the chosen one you don't see; while slapping more and more words onto others to help identify what you see.
Association implies joining together...having a choice implies being set apart within balance, hence FREE to choose at will. Association binds free.
jew is a behavior
Being cannot have (posses; hold onto; keep to self) while being (life) moved (inception towards death). As resistance within velocity...holding onto wastes resistance.
Few suggest behavior to many so that each one ignores to be FREE to choose at will. Nature makes it very clear what to choose (need) and what to resist (want)...yet temptation implies ignorance of resistance, and guess what? Ignorance is bliss.
Bliss/blithiz - "gentle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bliss#etymonline_v_13608 There's the gentile and the jewing to hide it.
a system or method for management of those without a hord of esoteric knowledge
ESO (inner) implies suggested information held within ones consenting mind/memory. EXO (outer) implies perceivable inspiration (aka knowledge) moving through each ones perception.
The former tempts one to hord/store it within ones memory; which permits those suggesting it to establish systems and methods of manage (manually directing) ment (mind/memory)...the latter moves and cannot be held onto; an ongoing solution for each temporary problem within to draw from.
One doesn't need to store any information within ones mind/memory...ones consent misuses memory as storage for suggested information. Perceivable inspiration doesn't require ones consent (send together)...it sends one apart from one another, hence in-between moving differences as inspiration for one to sustain self.
Everything is inspiration...the more information one holds within, the less inspiration one draws from outside.
Example...if one doesn't know how to fish, one doesn't require a "how to fish" manual. Hunger inspires one to catch food. Getting hungry next to a river teaches one how to learn fishing.
Do you have a way to express a connection to/desire for/appreciation of the One, once words fail?
BEING...expressed by way; one enabled to connect; desire; appreciate with or without words.
The issue...one doesn't require the word "being" to be.
They force you to link your PSN account to the game before playing
When you consider to dive into hell for a second time yet don't wanna be held accountable...
a) Identification/identical - "same".
b) Different marks (suggested words) to cover sameness (perceivable sound)...tick; tick; tick...BOMB, verb - "to sound".
the basic issue still persists
a) Base solution (inception towards death) issues ingredients (life)
b) Persistence aka PER (by forwards motion) SISTERE (come to stand, cause to stand still)...what if motion cannot stand still, since it inherent nature implies MOTION?
even worse
Even (balance) generates odds (choice)...odds ignoring even "makes it worse".
jewishness is either a religion, an ethnicity, or a nationality
a) All perceivable WAS before one within can suggest one another what it IS.
b) Being one within all implies nation aka NATIVE within ACTION. What is native within action? Each ones reaction.
c) If ones FREE will of choice chooses to Ignore perception for suggestion, then that implies religion/religio - "to bind anew".
d) Ethnic/ethnos - "nation; people" aka singular native within plural collective.
we look around
a) What does singular (one) among plural (we) see from ones surrounding?
b) Notice that moving around while looking/locking onto something implies circling a center...that's the opposite of being center (ones perception) within circumference (all perceivable).
einstein
Aka ein st ein aka ONE SAINT ONE.
No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it
a) Same solution (inception towards death) generates different problems (life) through internal transmutation.
b) Suggesting creationism (out of nothing) distracts from everything perceivable if consented to.
c) CON (together; with) SCIOUS/SCIRE/SCIO (to know) tempts one to ignore that knowledge implies all perceivable set apart into each ones perception.
One doesn't have a con-sciousness...one is being conned by another ones suggestion to ignore perception (knowledge; scio).
getting people just to ask that question
a) What if getting many on a quest (question) to seek answers from others is how a jew tempt gentiles with suggested progressivism to seek desired outcomes?
b) What if each person (singular) among people (plural) already got all sound, hence being per sonos (by sound)? What if trying to get from one another tempts one to ignore self discernment?
How does one get jewed? By buying into what a jew is selling aka by consenting to a chosen ones suggestion aka by establishing a master with ones submission aka by religio - " to bind anew".
Religion/rely - "to gather, assemble an army, followers, a host"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rely
Inception towards death...a flat line.
Life...a curve within a flat line.
Ration/reason/logic...a circular conflict in ignorance of balanced direction.
GLOBE, verb - "to gather round or into a circle"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Globe
Nature doesn't gather (to bring together) it sets each one apart from one another...ones consent to the suggestion of another permits suggesting few to gather consenting many together, WHILE nature sets apart.
Few tempt many together to establish a temporary indigestion within the ongoing process of nature, which permits few to utilize natural (setting apart) against artificial (brought together).